Hi Dora, I think this idea will be a very usefull tool in the management of the AG. I have asked Rocky and Breaker to have a look at it.Would certainly make the access of information much easier.I also just checked out the WC website www.newpif.com.au and it seems to be comprehensive though not quite complete. I am so over Perpetual Nominees being the Trustees of the Fund!! So what if quote:Hi Everyone,
I would like to suggest we use Yahoo Groups for our discussions. It can be used in the same way we are using this forum (i.e. lurkers are welcome to read discussion threads) but has heaps of other features for those willing to ‘join’ the group.
Joining the group means creating a yahoo account (just as you had to create an Aussie Stock Forum account if you wanted to post to this forum). The extra features include:
•A group calendar
•A central location for attachments (currently it is too hard to go back and find attachments on this 16 page thread)
•It enables multiple threads to be created for each topic of discussion
•We can create polls and get an idea of how people feel about certain topics.
•We can create databases and other more advanced features if needed.
I think the group is going to grow quickly (especially after the WC updates in July) and so need a better way to organise our information and keep everyone up to date.
I have created an example Yahoo Group at this link http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/PIFActionGroup. If you want to see the full features of the group you will need to ‘join the group’. Please note this is just an example and it will be deleted (so not to cause confusion) if it’s decided not to use Yahoo.
Regards,
Dora.
I agree - $100 is a very small price to pay for necessary legal advice, considering the amount we may stand to lose if we make an uninformed decision.
Having an incorporated legal entity set up with proper legal backing will give the Action Group far more credibility and power, while protecting the individual members. Possibly the $100 per member can go into a general fighting fund account as there will also be costs associated with Action Group meetings which can be paid from this fund (e.g. advertising, printing, venue hire).
I agree that we should have a fighting fund and am happy to contribute $100 for legal advice etc. Re: the forms for the meetings: our "financial advisor" (who helped us get in this mess in the first place) emailed me the form then when I expressed interest in attending the meeting in Sydney sent the following message:
"I have just made enquiries and have been advised that as your investment was made via an administration service ( ie The Avenue Investment Service) you are not reqiured to complete the invitation which was attached to the previous email. A seperate acceptance is required which I will send directly to them on your behalf."
So if you have also invested through Avenue or similar you may have to go through your financial advisor to register for the meeting.
Thanks Iamspeed
It will be interesting to see how much detail is provided on the individual positions of each investment
Wally could you perhaps get your mother to sign something to the effect that you will represent her ie.her proxy?Regards, SeamistyThe registration forms state
The forum venues are listed below. Please complete your registration details below, along with your investor ID number and advise
your preferred location. If you would like us to consider additional venues, please send your request to the address below. Entry will
be limited to registered Unit holders.
Does this mean that I am not able to go and help my elderly pensioner mother with any advice.
She will have trouble remembering all she will be told and even now she does'nt understand what has happened to her money, just that she not getting any income.
The registration forms state
The forum venues are listed below. Please complete your registration details below, along with your investor ID number and advise
your preferred location. If you would like us to consider additional venues, please send your request to the address below. Entry will
be limited to registered Unit holders.
Does this mean that I am not able to go and help my elderly pensioner mother with any advice.
She will have trouble remembering all she will be told and even now she does'nt understand what has happened to her money, just that she not getting any income.
WC is NOT the RE..a solicitor did some searches on our behalf and it seems that Octaviar Investment Management Limited is still the RE, but has just undergone a name change to Wellington Capital Investment Management..the RE licence is still Octaviar. She has merely purchased the management rights, this is just a way to try and keep WC as her being "accepted" by OCV means that the little clause in the PDS about a change in RE absolves OCV of the $50m Callable Facility, if we replace her then it's gone with another RE. All very smart BUT if she can't deliver on the $50m..or at least a good chunk of it..she is no different to any other RE that may present itself to us. JH better do a good deal for PIF and not a deal for OCV and Chris Scott. The solicitor also advises that there have been a zillion constitutional changes, which are only allowed without the consent of investors ONLY on the proviso these changes do not adversely affect investors. With all these losses, if there has been a constutional change that has adversely affected us, then there is cause for ASIC to investigate. Gee you know I wonder if JH really knows how much of a headache this is going to be for her AND to her rep?
She also advise us to request a list of all investors and a copy of the fund's constitution. I am hopefully meeting with her soon to advise me of other requirements and costs to move forward..will advise.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?