- Joined
- 15 April 2007
- Posts
- 198
- Reactions
- 0
Thanks SGB. I printed this out and tried to follow it and can see what you mean [I think].
Good stuff.
Rick[/QUOTE]
Hi Rick,
As mentioned in a previous post, I am a trader,I trade for a living so I need constant cashflow.Therefore my whole analysis is based on T/A, pure price patterns and behaviours in the very short term. Basiclly my time frame is a Daily Chart.
After reading the posts on this page of the thread,and this stock is one that I trade, I had a hunch that the majority of interested posters were more inclined to be fundamental longterm investers and therefore I posted the Monthly longterm chart to give a better insight of the possibilities/probabilities and how value is interpreted.
Is it unfair / fair to use a different timeframe or is there a "recommended" period? For example, if you read / analyse the chart from mid-April, or after TOL made their Virgin announcement, then do you get a different analytical outcome? Or is this non-TA think? [I suspect it is].
To a trader (short term)value means nothing and announcements will only change price action in that moment( the here and now).Therefore a trader will adapt proactivlely to any price action change that may have occurred after the announcement was made.
Whereas an invester (fundamental longer timeframe), value is a key element for their investment over a longer period of time and the announcement may have an impact over their strategic decision, wether positive or negative.
But you also must remember that all stocks are dealt with emotional reaction. Everyone ( investers) must agree that the news will be positive in the longer term for a higher price.
Therefore to answer your question,
unfair/fair[QUOTE/],do you get a different analytical outcome? [QUOTE/], my prospective will be completly different to an invester as I trade in the here and now.
I hope this helps
SGB