Kauri
E/W Learner
- Joined
- 3 September 2005
- Posts
- 3,428
- Reactions
- 11
18 June 2004: The UK, Germany and France draft a resolution for the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, "deploring" Iran's lack of co-operation with inspections.
21 June 2004: Eight British sailors are held in Iran after their vessel apparently strays into Iranian waters near the border with Iraq. They are released three days later following negotiations between British diplomats and Iranian officials.
What exactly is the 'punishment' in Iran for what the soldiers have allegedly done?
LOL. Can't imagine it happening though can you? Different situations to Hicks I suppose. Is that what you're refferring to?
In regards to Iranian territory, Blair seems to be saying that their understanding was that they were NOT in Iranian waters. If that is the case, capturing foreign soldiers/sailors in international waters could be deemed an act of war in itself.
Haven't seen the last of this one.
This isn't the first time that British troops have been 'abducted' by the Iranians.. and in fact this occurred to Gold boarding party when I was on HMAS Adelaide a couple of years ago up there (thankfully, I was in Green Boarding Party).. the boys had inserted, and the RHIB's cut for it when the Iranian's turned up, leaving the boys stranded on the vessel, all Iranian guns trained on them.. Tense time for all involved. The Americans kitted out a couple of S70's to chase them off, but got recalled half way there. It all ended many hours later when our S70 extracted them..In regards to Iranian territory, Blair seems to be saying that their understanding was that they were NOT in Iranian waters. If that is the case, capturing foreign soldiers/sailors in international waters could be deemed an act of war in itself.
DJ US Navy Spokesman: Received No Reports Of Gulf Conflict
28/03/2007 07:57AM AEST WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--
The U.S. Navy has received no reports of military action in the Middle East, a spokesman said Tuesday.
Cmdr. Dave Werner, a Navy spokesman, said: "We received no such reports."
The Pentagon on Tuesday also said it was unaware of any military confrontation in the Persian Gulf, a spokesman said.
Earlier Tuesday, rumors of a possible conflict in the region stemming from Iran's detention of 15 U.K. naval personnel circulated in the energy markets. The sailors and marines have been held since being seized in the Gulf on Friday.
Crude oil futures jumped nearly 8% in a matter of minutes in after hours trading Tuesday, topping $68.00 a barrel, as rumors of a military confrontation in the Gulf involving Iran spurred panic buying.
US military build-up on Iran border: Russian Intelligence
From correspondents in Moscow, Russia, 10:32 PM IST
Moscow, March 27 (RIA Novosti) Russian military intelligence services are reporting a flurry of activity by US Armed Forces near Iran's borders, a high-ranking security source said Tuesday.
'The latest military intelligence data point to heightened US military preparations for both an air and ground operation against Iran,' the official said, adding that the Pentagon has probably not yet made a final decision as to when an attack will be launched.
He said the Pentagon is looking for a way to deliver a strike against Iran 'that would enable the Americans to bring the country to its knees at minimal cost.'
He also said the US Naval presence in the Persian Gulf has for the first time in the past four years reached the level that existed shortly before the invasion of Iraq in March 2003.
Colonel-General Leonid Ivashov, vice president of the Academy of Geopolitical Sciences, said last week that the Pentagon is planning to deliver a massive air strike on Iran's military infrastructure in the near future.
A new US carrier battle group has been dispatched to the Gulf.
The USS John C. Stennis, with a crew of 3,200 and around 80 fixed-wing aircraft, including F/A-18 Hornet and Super hornet fighter-bombers, eight support ships and four nuclear submarines are heading for the Gulf, where a similar group led by the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower has been deployed since Dec 2006. The US is also sending Patriot anti-missile systems to the region.
Personally. I have zero faith in the americans at present, nothing would surprise me.Hmmmm, do you think they would have the balls to do this twice without UN approval? I hope they are sable rattling.
Cheers,
Sabre rattling. The only thing they can do at the moment is an extended air strike. They have no ground troops to commit. Would take months of logistic build up to support them. Iran is a different beast than Iraq. There is no chance of a US direct ground attack IMO. Not for maybe a year. However, they probably have enough 'precision' bombs to keep hitting for some time. I think they will leave it to the CIA and special forces for the time being.Hmmmm, do you think they would have the balls to do this twice without UN approval? I hope they are sable rattling.
Cheers,
Although, I am with you Wayne. Bush boy and the central southern bible bashing hick, must go.Personally. I have zero faith in the americans at present, nothing would surprise me.
The lunatics are in control.
Hmmmm, do you think they would have the balls to do this twice without UN approval? I hope they are sable rattling.
Cheers,
See image\/
Yep, was just the rumour of a battle in the gulf.I mentioned that this morning in the oil thread. The rumour at the time was some sort of hostilities had begun. It said that only a few contracts were bought at the top. Obviously a nervous market at the moment.
Why, what are you thinking here?
Cheers,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?