Boofhead.
The source of lifespan of optic cable was a network architect for Telstra who has worked with optics fo 14 years.
He also stated ..
# New DSL technologies will emerge. 15 years ago we had 56K dial up. Then 12 years ago we got 256k ADSL, Then 8 years ago we got 1.5mbps ADSL2, then 5 years ago 20Mbps ADSL2+. There are already new DSL technologies being experimented on that will deliver over 50 Mbps on the same copper we have now. $zero cost to tax payer.
# You cannot give every house 100Mbps. If you give several million home 100Mbps bandwidth, then you have exceeded the entire bandwidth. In reality there is a thing called contention. Today every ADSL service with 20Mbps has a contention ratio of around 20:1 (or more for some carriers). That means, you share that 20Mbps with 20 other people. Its a long story why, but there will NEVER be the case of people getting 100Mbps of actual band width. Not for several decades at current carrier equipment rates of evolution.
The "Core" cannot and will not be able to handle that sort of bandwidth.
The 100Mbps or 1Gbps is only the speed from your house to exchange. From there to the Internet, you will get same speeds as now. The "Core" of Australia's network is already fibre(many times over).
No doubt many will be aware that a combination of wireless(4G which is specifically being developed for data not 3G which was voice), satellite, copper and fibre will be the final result. Well I am assuming "common sense' WILL EVENTUALLY prevail".
Me I have satellite, on both sides of me they have copper wire broadband. Why because the installation of wires was below par. Most homes in my area have "pair gains" telephone and this will not handle broadband. I have copper phone "pair gains".
Finally this debate would have been very much subdued, if a redhead politican
had not made the rash statement of hooking all the homes with fibre at 100Mbps. "THEY SAY A LITTLE UNDERSTANDING IS A DANGEROUS THING"
Cheers.p.s. When i work out how to reduce the email size i will attach it.
The source of lifespan of optic cable was a network architect for Telstra who has worked with optics fo 14 years.
He also stated ..
# New DSL technologies will emerge. 15 years ago we had 56K dial up. Then 12 years ago we got 256k ADSL, Then 8 years ago we got 1.5mbps ADSL2, then 5 years ago 20Mbps ADSL2+. There are already new DSL technologies being experimented on that will deliver over 50 Mbps on the same copper we have now. $zero cost to tax payer.
# You cannot give every house 100Mbps. If you give several million home 100Mbps bandwidth, then you have exceeded the entire bandwidth. In reality there is a thing called contention. Today every ADSL service with 20Mbps has a contention ratio of around 20:1 (or more for some carriers). That means, you share that 20Mbps with 20 other people. Its a long story why, but there will NEVER be the case of people getting 100Mbps of actual band width. Not for several decades at current carrier equipment rates of evolution.
The "Core" cannot and will not be able to handle that sort of bandwidth.
The 100Mbps or 1Gbps is only the speed from your house to exchange. From there to the Internet, you will get same speeds as now. The "Core" of Australia's network is already fibre(many times over).
No doubt many will be aware that a combination of wireless(4G which is specifically being developed for data not 3G which was voice), satellite, copper and fibre will be the final result. Well I am assuming "common sense' WILL EVENTUALLY prevail".
Me I have satellite, on both sides of me they have copper wire broadband. Why because the installation of wires was below par. Most homes in my area have "pair gains" telephone and this will not handle broadband. I have copper phone "pair gains".
Finally this debate would have been very much subdued, if a redhead politican
had not made the rash statement of hooking all the homes with fibre at 100Mbps. "THEY SAY A LITTLE UNDERSTANDING IS A DANGEROUS THING"
Cheers.p.s. When i work out how to reduce the email size i will attach it.