Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
From Calliope's link to Paul Sheehan's article:
This is something I suspect many Australians are unaware of, having swallowed the line that lawyers are all acting pro bono and therefore incurring no cost to the taxpayer. It would be good to see the actual dollar figure that e.g. this most recent appeal to the High Court has racked up.
It looks pretty clear that the government and the opposition have between them sufficient motivation to significantly alter the Migration Act, to a point which will remove the validity of further Court challenges. I hope they can both hold their tempers enough to achieve this.
It will be well worth their trouble, if for no better reason than the fury it will engender within the Greens and their supporters.
Of 148 decisions handed down by the Federal Court this year, 43 of them, almost one in three, were immigration cases.
The Federal Court has so far heard 157 cases involving the Minister for Immigration this year, by far the largest category.
The Refugee Review Tribunal has heard 737 cases this year, and counting.
Most immigration litigation is being funded by the taxpayer, either directly via legal aid or circuitously via other subsidies.
This is something I suspect many Australians are unaware of, having swallowed the line that lawyers are all acting pro bono and therefore incurring no cost to the taxpayer. It would be good to see the actual dollar figure that e.g. this most recent appeal to the High Court has racked up.
It looks pretty clear that the government and the opposition have between them sufficient motivation to significantly alter the Migration Act, to a point which will remove the validity of further Court challenges. I hope they can both hold their tempers enough to achieve this.
It will be well worth their trouble, if for no better reason than the fury it will engender within the Greens and their supporters.