- Joined
- 21 June 2009
- Posts
- 5,880
- Reactions
- 14
Errrrrrmmmmmmmm ...... the amount she pays in Royalties and Taxes both State and Federally is enough to keep a certain Banana Republic afloat.
Grr! I felt exactly the same.Harvey Norman is doing well out of me .... I was listening to the radio in my shed and the news came on. Julia Gillard was giving a "speech" to the media scrum ........ Fair Dinkum !!! If I heard the words "HARD WORK" come out of her mouth one more time I would have burst a vessel. Instead I picked up the radio and smashed it.
1) The country is doing so well because of her Governments "HARD WORK"
2) The "HARD WORK" is not over yet and more needs to be done.
3) Due to her "HARD WORK" in the Senate we have a stable governement.
4) It will only be "HARD WORK" for her to win the next election.
5) *SMASH RADIO*
SHEEEEEEESHHHH !!! Hard work listening the b!tch I reckon !!!
Good suggestion, Eager. That plus the fact that Rudd simply doesn't have the numbers should mean everything settles down because neither side has anything to gain by bringing on a challenge.I ask, genuinely - do you think the negative focus on Gillard is losing its effect, maybe it reached a saturation point but is now yesterdays news? Her tactics of hanging tough and not digging herself into any holes regarding a possible challenge from Rudd might explain the slight increase in the polls.
Are you really in a position to understand all of the situation regarding Ms Reinhardt's family? You don't know whether or not she may have good reason for her actions re her children. I don't know, and don't really care either way. I don't think it's any of the business of the Australian public.then there is the way she treats her kids.
+100.Oakeshott unimpressed with a self-obsessed Labor? I must be seeing stars. The guy has to be one of the greatest pompous/self-absorbed idiots of all time. Bring on the election :freak3::freak3::freak3::freak3:
Errrrrrmmmmmmmm ...... the amount she pays in Royalties and Taxes both State and Federally is enough to keep a certain Banana Republic afloat.
Windsor doubts Gillard will be dumped
"If there was a change in leadership I would have to look at those circumstances at the time.
Those "different times" are all since September last year,
Mr Oakeshott said he had not received any telephone calls from Kevin Rudd or Labor “Praetorian guards” on the leadership issue."
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...loses-supporters/story-fn59niix-1226143719240
Mr Oakeshott, one of three independent MPs who agreed to back Labor under Ms Gillard after the 2010 election produced a hung parliament, said yesterday that Rudd supporters had canvassed him about change "in very general terms", although not recently.
When we were very young we were told not to lie to our parents.
At school the same instructions were given.
In religion "Though shalt not lie" is one of the 10 commandments.
So my question is, did Gillard have selective hearing when she was young.
In politics she started off with a white lie, then it continued until it became intensive lying. It has spread through the Labor organization to such an extent the whole country has accepted it as a "blood sport". i.e. Wivenhoe operation and inquiry.
In all fairness most politicians "twist the truth" a little. but not to the extent of Juliar.
The following attachment sums up Gillard.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...ault-but-her-own/story-fnahw9xv-1226264121525
The quicker we see Rudd and Gillard out of National politics the better.
joea
Bob Brown will be after you, he frowns on this sort of comment.Why couldn't she be hot aswell.
I will tell you what i find funny is as bad as she is she is more popular than The best the libs can come up with.
Bob Brown will be after you, he frowns on this sort of comment.
I will tell you what i find funny is as bad as she is she is more popular than The best the libs can come up with.
Ta.Good suggestion, Eager.
It's similar to the feelings that I had in the U.S. Crash thread where I stated that I was firmly in the 'recovery' camp. People WILL forget how bad things got over there; it is human nature to look forward. Similarly here, some people WILL forget some of the things that upset them with Labor/Gillard over the journey and live by the adage Better The Devil You Know etc. The election is a looooong way away yet. I'm not pretending that Labor will win, but IF the seas are COMPARITIVELY smooth between now and then, politically settling down if you like, the result MIGHT be close.That plus the fact that Rudd simply doesn't have the numbers should mean everything settles down because neither side has anything to gain by bringing on a challenge.
But that is politics. The ruling party gets to do that.I watched with intent interest question time in Parliament this afternnon with the first hour taken up by Gillard on the passing of Sir Selwyn Cowan and some journalist. I waited for queation and I waited and I waited with baited breath.
I could have thrown up my lunch listening to her wasting question time with her long spiel and finally turned off.
According to Andrew Bolt she closed down question earlier than normal.
Of what was she so afraid?
But that is politics. The ruling party gets to do that.
Tony Windsor has now chipped in on Gillard's leadership,
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8414891/windsor-doubts-gillard-will-be-dumped
Like Rob Oakeshott, his confidence however does not extend beyond having one each way,
Correct, but the three dicks were there to be woo'd after the election. And your mob couldn't.Isn't that ruling parties, julia, bob and three dicks.
Someone would wish.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.