Yes things have changed a lot, especially regarding the relative cost of a house.
In the early 1990's the two big costs to consumers were a house and a car.
Generally a car was a years salary and a house was three years salary (talking bread and butter car v bread and butter house)
Well the Basic Commodore, back then was $25k and had nowhere near the equipment, of the new Commodores.
Yet the new Commodore can be bought for mid $30k.
http://www.mynrma.com.au/motoring/reviews/car-reviews/holden/commodore-vr.htm
Back then in Perth, the 'bread and butter' houses $100k, now they are $450-$500K.
So in real terms, it is only house price growth, that has far outstripped wage growth.
To feel the problem can't be solved, is very foolish.
One just has to ask the questions, what is supporting it and how long is that support needed.
90s commodores are fine. I have a 90s falcon. So does that mean I'm excused from 2010s house prices ?