- Joined
- 18 April 2007
- Posts
- 809
- Reactions
- 0
Ok we now both have Mr.Z on ignore. Fire away! I'm still here.....
The future of Australian property prices
- Thread starter Joe Blow
- Start date
Ok we now both have Mr.Z on ignore. Fire away! I'm still here.....
It is only a poor performing asset class if you believe it goes up every year Botty.
The chart below shows you would have averaged 3.4% annual growth over the 10 years to 2000, for a Brisbane property.
High inflation and rates through that decade (the 90s) saw the internal rate of return go backwards, as it did in the early 80s. The plot below is 1980 to 2010.
Guess what the All Ords did over the same period?
One day I'll convince you a timing model is better than buy and hold.
- Joined
- 18 April 2007
- Posts
- 809
- Reactions
- 0
shush, not now Z.
waiting for Robot to explain why he thinks property will keep up in real terms
waiting for Robot to explain why he thinks property will keep up in real terms
Most people don't get that property works because it is a leveraged bet that inflation will continue, a safe bet under most circumstances. However big valuation multiples at the bottom of a long term rate cycle is something I find a little scary.
Yes... a time and place for every investment. I want performance not religion and right now it still looks like there are better places to be.
MR. on my best.... promise.
Wysiwyg
Everyone wants money
- Joined
- 8 August 2006
- Posts
- 8,428
- Reactions
- 284
Hi SusanW. Do you envisage mortgage interest rates to exceed 10% by 2012? Appears chart wise the uptrend is strengthening. ??
- Joined
- 27 February 2008
- Posts
- 4,670
- Reactions
- 10
You didnt ask me .... so heres my opinion
13%(or roundabouts ) before this cycle is complete in my uneducated, unbiased and property holding opinion.
Notice i said cycle instead of giving a timeframe
I'd say a 45% probability. The asx implied yield curve has been reasonably accurate in the past, and they are only forecasting 2 x 25bp by mid 2012.
the greater risk is a tightening of foreign credit, which means higher funding costs for our lenders.
I don't know which chart you are referring to. The first is capital growth, and it has peaked and is coming down.
The second is IRR. As one holds property longer, rising rent contributes more and more to +CF and IRR.
I was fortunate enough to pick the commodities run in response to anticipation of QE2. Risk adjusted rewards have been profoundly higher than any passive property deal I could have secured in that time. Money velocity features heavily in my investment philosophy.
- Joined
- 18 April 2007
- Posts
- 809
- Reactions
- 0
potential investment property investors all of 3% over 2 years if they started paying attention in Sep 2008?
For those that bought in Sep 2008 with an eye to flip in Sep 2009, I only have the rude finger.
Huh? Quarterly change would be compounding! You trying to confuse Robots?
Here ya go:
View attachment Doc1.pdf
I've waited long enough for Robots tonight, need some shut eye.
- Joined
- 3 November 2009
- Posts
- 36
- Reactions
- 0
Quality of Post Count also too a battering in the September qtr. Writing was not on the wall so to speak.
nukz
888
- Joined
- 27 July 2008
- Posts
- 253
- Reactions
- 0
Does anybody have this sort of data for california or some other US states? That would be quite interesting.
- Joined
- 18 April 2007
- Posts
- 809
- Reactions
- 0
What’s so bad about that chart?
Even in 2000 property was increasing at approx’ 3.5% that would mean property kept up with inflation.
What does it mean “10 year rolling”? In 2000 you could say “for the past 10 years property increased by approx 3.5% per year” That would be keeping up with today’s inflation so what’s the big deal?
Do I read this chart correctly?
So in 1990 I can say “property over the past 10 years has increased by near 10% per year”
In 2000 I can say “property over the past 10 years has increased by near 3.5% per year”
Hang on!
I’ll look at it one year at a time!
In 1990 I can say “property over the past 10 years has increased by near 10% per year”
In 1991 I can say “property over the past 10 years has increased by near 8% per year”
So 10% over 10 years and in one year alone property changed from that 10% to 8% for “all those years!”
This chart doesn’t look as good now. That’s Brisbane. How’s Melbourne?
It is only a poor performing asset class if you believe it goes up every year Botty.
The chart below shows you would have averaged 3.4% annual growth over the 10 years to 2000, for a Brisbane property.
High inflation and rates through that decade (the 90s) saw the internal rate of return go backwards, as it did in the early 80s. The plot below is 1980 to 2010.
Guess what the All Ords did over the same period?
One day I'll convince you a timing model is better than buy and hold.
hello,
exactly man, just plenty of people around who cannot afford a property because they spend their money on other things
oh well, thats the decisions people make
no bubble,
thankyou
professor robots
nukz
888
- Joined
- 27 July 2008
- Posts
- 253
- Reactions
- 0
What your saying is ludicrous, housing is 8X medium income now compared to years ago which means your parents had to save allot less than you have to purchase a property today.
And you claim there is no bubble, lol now i know you have no idea. A bubble is a large increase in prices which has happened, but that does not necessarily mean the bubble will burst. There are lots of asset classes in bubbles but that does not mean they can't continue to inflate more it just means they exist.
Also a bubble is not always a bad thing, a bubble can take years between the time it inflates and when it deflates and allot of money can be made in-between.
Can you provide any evidence at all to suggest there is no bubble at all?
hello,
yes, see post 3634, as mentioned the return is a mere 3.4% per year
oh yeah, back in 1960, 1970, 1980 people were buying houses like a pack of fags at the milkbar
its just today people spend all their money, oh well
thankyou
professor robots
yes, see post 3634, as mentioned the return is a mere 3.4% per year
oh yeah, back in 1960, 1970, 1980 people were buying houses like a pack of fags at the milkbar
its just today people spend all their money, oh well
thankyou
professor robots
nukz
888
- Joined
- 27 July 2008
- Posts
- 253
- Reactions
- 0
Don't use today tonight/current affair as your source of what the population are doing lol
Those single mums they show everyweek who loaded up on 40 months intreat free junk at harvey norman and are now being forclosed on and blame the banks for giving them the loan meanwhile they unload there furniture in a brand new 4X4 are not the real population lol.
Also your only refering to Brisbane prices, what was the Melbourne rise in 2008 / 2009? since you live in Melbourne.
hello,
OH YEAH:
http://www.theage.com.au/business/economic-growth-slows-20101201-18fyv.html
a big well done Kincella, top effort brother, its just amazing to be able to communicate with one of the five
fairly embarrassing for the RBA
thankyou
professor robots
OH YEAH:
http://www.theage.com.au/business/economic-growth-slows-20101201-18fyv.html
a big well done Kincella, top effort brother, its just amazing to be able to communicate with one of the five
fairly embarrassing for the RBA
thankyou
professor robots
- Joined
- 6 January 2009
- Posts
- 2,300
- Reactions
- 1,130
How is this embarrassing?
Oh, I keep forgeting that they hire idiots for the RBA board with no understanding, education or experience in economic matters.
Maybe Robots and Kincella should try and get on the board.
Cheers
