PZ99
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Joined
- 13 May 2015
- Posts
- 3,331
- Reactions
- 2,448
When David Leyonhjelm told Sarah Hanson-Young to "stop shagging men" her best response should've been "stop shagging men yourself".Libertariansm vs PC ?
Personally I think Lleyonhjelm crossed the line and should apologise.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-...fuses-to-apologise-sarah-hanson-young/9931386
Its a sht fight now. Here come the lawyers. Interesting comment from coreyWhen David Leyonhjelm told Sarah Hanson-Young to "stop shagging men" her best response should've been "stop shagging men yourself".
That would've been the end of it
Quite true! And your response seemed to be an immediate conflation of, references to a heavenly parental figure, with a vindictive, jealous, racist deity. So another question was aked in the hope of alerting readers to the existence of an interpretation that is both benign, and reasonable.That is not what you asked. You asked "Are the wishes of that particular prayer ,out of accord with the wishes of the people? If so, how so?".
I am confident that you will recall, the author of that prayer, being presented with a similar challenge. He responded, by providing a revised set of commandments. Let me know if you need any help looking them up!The first of the 10 commandments. Are you suggesting that the Father in the Lord's Prayer is different to the God who made the 10 commandments and his will does not want us to obey said commandments? And if you are saying that it really is a different God completely, then obviously you are out of tune with those who want to keep the Lord's Prayer who see the Father in the prayer as also being the God who set the 10 commandments.
Entertaining concepts of god, specifically filtered for the primary purpose, of contesting the merits of theism, does seem a bit.....If we are talking about your own personal God with unspecified expectations, then I shall stop wasting time arguing with you.
Was this intended as an insult?Well if you don't understand a simple concept of truth vs myth
then there is really no point going on.
Pretty sure no insult by SirR intended.Was this intended as an insult?
If so, then you are correct when saying:
Was this intended as an insult?
Thanks for clarifying your position.No, you say your religion is Truth, but I really can't see much truth in the Lord's Prayer.
Consider a recent spat in which accusations and counter accusations are being levelled. Now consider how different that situation could be, if just one, of the participants, were to allow certain virtues to inform, his or her, actions. And even better, if both had been operating, from the outset, in accordance with such truth, the dispute would never have eventuated.
"forgive us ...as we forgive" (Golden Rule?!!)Application of the Golden Rule would achieve the same thing, but little is mentioned of this in the Lord's Prayer. It's mostly about God's power and is recited merely by tradition, whereas other meditations could bear more on the practicalities of life.
Given how many of the Western world's present issues stem from what happened during the Reagan and Thatcher era I won't take anything said by either too seriously.Ronald Reagan
What issues would they be Smurf?
[SHY] viciously attacks him as a "middle aged white man". According to Marxist PC rules that is ageist, sexist & racist...The Redbaiter.Just so we are clear on who the headcase is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?