Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
etc etc, Syd.The same Govt that is Ok txing the large companies for an overly generous PPL is now siding with those same companies to try and cut back on the shift penalties for those working weekends, public holidays and unsavoury late hours and over night.
We've been all through this many times before. I don't know who you're trying to convince. No one here has ever offered any support for Mr Abbott's PPL.
For that matter I don't support any PPL. If people want to have babies then they can pay for them themselves.
And double that sentiment when it comes to same sex couples being funded by the taxpayer for countless rounds of IVF.
Why don't we wait and see how Morrison handles his new portfolio. I'm not at all sure the general public will take the view you suggest above. Perhaps more along the lines of Rumpole's suggestion about some of the people on the DSP.My hope is that the push back from the relatively unfair budget means any effort to demonise the poor and unemployed wont get public support. With rising unemployment and more people feeling insecure with their employment, a lot more voters will be thinking about what any proposed changes could mean for them.
I don't think any reasonable person would agree that $35 per day is enough to live on. But I'll also acknowledge that I don't know where the line should be drawn between an incentive to find a job and an amount which is comfortable to live on long term.
I can't remember when that low dole level happened: was it under this government or did Labor also have it at $35 p. day plus rent assistance?