This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The Abbott Government


Yeah Rumpy, we know all that stuff.....that repetitive rhetoric is becoming boring.
 
I have edited you post for you:


 

And he qualifies for the extreme abuse he recieves, based on the above, jeez really.

It is somewhat sad, that we humans have a 'pack' mentality, it isn't a very attractive trait.

Now the Government has folded on defence spending cuts, spend, spend, spend is what everyone wants.

I guess I'm old fashioned, and need to get with the times.
 
sptrawler said:
And he qualifies for the extreme abuse he recieves, based on the above, jeez really.

That, plus the rest of his policies that hit people who can least afford it.
 

SP. the Green/Labor left wing socialists are in complete denial and just don't want to accept reality....they have absolutely no concern for the welfare of Australia and those who live here......no National interest.....only interested in themselves....Sham on them.
 
It is going to be so interesting to see how the Abbott Government and the Liberal Party overall respond to how the Labour party so decisively won the Victorian State election.

The fact was that Labour embarked on a systematic person to person conversation with the swinging voters in the key marginal electorates. It took thousands of committed volunteers but the result is there to see. The conversations had an effect.

It is Londan to a brick that this model will be rolled out for the next Federal election. But far more significantly for the Libs I just cannot see how they counteract it. As far as I can see they just couldn't muster the thousands of people required to doorknock and talk with the hundreds of thousands of voters that were approached in Victoria.

Even worse for the Libs what they will hear from the doorknockers will be 10 times uglier than anything Napthine did.

http://www.theguardian.com/australi...-says-its-victory-has-revolutionised-politics
 

Quarantine NG to new builds.
Force APRA and RBA to bring in macro-prudential along the lines of what NZ introduced

Now that you've put a cap on mortgage debt ballooning the RBA can lower interest rates

Establish a policy for the future that will limit the AUD from going too far above it's fundamental value - ie don't let Dutch Disease kill off the non mining sectors again.

This should have been done over a decade ago. It's a massive blind spot to the major parties.

Instead of pumping billions into roads that have a less than a $ economic return for each $ invested, use funds to encourage the states to move towards land taxes to make infrastructure investment self funding via increases in land values through infrastructure being recouped via higher land taxes. Infrastructure Australia already has a lit of projects that would help with the current CAPEX cliff and increase the productive potential of the economy over the medium to long term. That the Govt is ignoring IA is up their with Labor's ignoring of the Henry tax review.

Technically Labor didn't wedge any increases in. It's a supposedly independent process on the pollies pay, and I don't seem to recall the Liberals calling for any form of wage restraint.


I'd argue 95% of the country is in denial.

Macquarie Bank sums it up quite nicely today. I'd argue the below is another reason for the angst within the electorate. Most people are already feeling like it's a recession.


Pretty much all the reasons Howard is lauded as an economic marvel are now in reverse. The true economic marvel will be the politician who can honestly explain the above to the voters, create a centrist budget plan that shares the pain of cuts AND tax increases fairly, and is able to communicate this in such a way that the public accepts it and then the senate has little support to block the measures. We have world leading tax expenditures to be hacked into.

The current Govt doesn't seem up to the task based on their performance this year, though Labor has not done anything to make me think they're willing to be any more honest than Abbott was when in opposition.
 
A little bit more annalysis on just how unfair the university deregulation will be.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/hig...see-48k-degrees/story-e6frgcjx-1227067015109#


In June, the National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling (NATSEM), which is attached to the University of Canberra, released estimates of how the May Budget’s changes to university fees are likely to impact on various courses, and found that the impact would “be felt most strongly for low-pay occupations such as nursing or education, and across the board the impacts are larger for females”. The modelling “assumed that students will face a repayment interest rate of 5% which is around twice that of the CPI (the existing indexation) but lower than the typical 10 year Treasury bond rate (the proposed loan interest rate) of 6% over the past decade” (see below table).

We're already falling behind in the STEM fields. Considering a lot of the jobs in those industries aren't the highest paying, we'll likely see more students opting to do something finance related to help repay the doubling of their debts. I suppose it makes sense for a Govt without a science minister.


The below video sums up where we're headed if these changes make it through.

[video=youtube_share;P8pjd1QEA0c]http://youtu.be/P8pjd1QEA0c?list=PLmKbqjSZR8TZa7wyVoVq2XMHxxWREyiF c[/video]
 

Attachments

  • uni dereg.jpg
    52.2 KB · Views: 14
  • stem enrolements.PNG
    230.7 KB · Views: 89
It's the universities job to serve the needs of the nation, not themselves.

They do this by providing the skills that we as a nation need to grow the economy and provide services while the graduates earn more money and therefore pay more tax (hopefully).

So even if the universities increase their prestige factor and become more attractive to foreign students, so what ?

The foreign students then go back to their own countries and provide services there, and pay no tax here. What benefit is that to us ?

Christopher Pyne and his cronies should get real and stop looking at all government activities in fundamentalist market terms.

There is such a thing as the national interest, and deregulated universities will not be contributing to that.
 

Good post Syd, your last sentence sums up my feelings, exactly.
 

Could that be because nursing and teaching, really shouldn't be university degrees?

Maybe a return to teaching hospitals and teachers traing colleges is called for.
Where a large component is actually on the job training, where trainee nurses work in the hospital and do a three year traineeship.
The same could apply to teacher training, it's not as though they are formulating abstract curiculum, that requires indepth quantum mathmatics.
A large component of both jobs, is interpersonal and observation skills, which are developed in the work place.

The main reasons they became uni degrees had nothing to do with complexity, more to do with the unions justifying pay restructures and it also faciltated the governments getting out of the cost of training.

Much like, when governments washed their hands of taking on heaps of apprentices, saying it was the responsibility of the private sector.
 
Nothing like mounting fear on the back bench to sharpen a few knives.

The Victorian election has really rattled a few cages lets see if Abbott can do a back step triple pike back ward somersault with more lies and broken promisers.


I still think the ADF pay rise has legs yet certainly one of the more cowardly moves yet to price signal the public service hiding behind the arm forces.
 

You just don't get, do you?

You and you comrades are in complete denial and will not accept the fact that the Green/Labor socialist left wingers left no money in the kitty...as I keep saying, those $900 generous Rudd cheques were just a loan and now must be paid back...they all rubbed their hands together when they arrived in the post, but in actual fact it was one big Rudd con job and now nobody wants to part with it....it is simple....you borrow money you have to pay it back with interest.

There is a lot of greed out there and nobody wants to tighten their belts...They all put their greasy palms out for more money, led by the unions, without any thought as to where the money comes from....They all think the country owes them a living and that there is no bottom to the pit of money....The Labor party's philosophy is, keep filling the workers pockets and they will all be happy....take some away and you are the worst in the world.

Wake up Australia....your country needs you to pull your weight....don't be so greedy when times are tough.
 
noco said:
Wake up Australia....your country needs you to pull your weight....don't be so greedy when times are tough.

Oh yes, all the low income people are sooo greedy, slaving away for minimal wages, unpaid overtime, holidays not taken etc.

Most of us don't have multiple negative geared investment properties at the taxpayers expense, or stash away large amounts of our bloated incomes in super taxed at 15% when our normal rate is 45%.

Fix these black holes and the rest of us may just start to think that everyone is pulling their weight.
 

It is the old old story...some people work harder than others..those hard workers who don't restrict themselves to 38 hour working week, pay their share of taxes, put some away for a rainy day are frowned upon for what they have achieved....then there are some clowns who are happy to work 38 hours per week and many who don't want to work at all, pizz it up against the wall and smoke their heads off and expect everything from the government for nothing......I am not saying they are not all like that but those are not are just happy to plod along in struggle street.

Yes from one who knows about slaving away, unpaid overtime and no holidays sometimes for 7 years....60 to 70 hours a week and the likes of you begrudge that type of person for what they have and what they have achieved.

Give it a break.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...