tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,417
- Reactions
- 6,356
Would Technical Analysis picked up that something wasn't quite right?
And how did it indicate something wasnt quite right? It seemed a very neutral comment to me unless im reading it wrong.
More of a 'watch this space' thing than 'look out somethings about to go wrong'. Thats just my view though, i could be interpreting it wrong
I'm no charting expert but I wouldn't have thought that chart predicted anything, and certainly not that sort of gap down.Did Fundamental Analysis give any warning that this was coming?
Would Technical Analysis picked up that something wasn't quite right?
That it was.---The day after the alert.
The question was Would Technical Analysis picked up that something wasn't quite right?
The answer is yes there was no demand with background weakness.
So before the drop-- infact a day before there was a warning that although price did rise slightly there was no demand.
The analysis told you it was weak not that it was going to crash next day.
So the "something not quite right" was No demand on that up bar.
You wouldnt have been placing a long buy based on that technical evidence.
You all seem upset that there was software that actually picked up that something was indeed wrong??
You all seem upset that there was software that actually picked up that something was indeed wrong??
I'm no charting expert but I wouldn't have thought that chart predicted anything, and certainly not that sort of gap down.
But it ties in pretty well with the announcement that the ACCC is after Cabcharge.
Seems like a straightforward response to negative news to me.
Even going back a little further there were very clear alerts on about the 8th, Tech can you provide the dialog box for those earlier alerts to weakness?
That it was.---The day after the alert.
The question was Would Technical Analysis picked up that something wasn't quite right?
The answer is yes there was no demand with background weakness.
So before the drop-- infact a day before there was a warning that although price did rise slightly there was no demand.
The analysis told you it was weak not that it was going to crash next day.
So the "something not quite right" was No demand on that up bar.
You wouldnt have been placing a long buy based on that technical evidence.
You all seem upset that there was software that actually picked up that something was indeed wrong??
ok . all well and good saying it indicated this or it indicated that
what i,d like to know is why it wasnt actually pointed out until afterwards or is this more hindsight i told u so bull that ppl like to preach so freely here ?
and before anyone starts stomping off or getting upset please note theres no offense intended , just intrested in all these great hindsight calls and indicators and wondering why they so easy to spot afterwards but not mentioned at time
Using the same argument, fundamental analysis could also have revealed the same.
Cabcharge has increased their market share from 50% to 85% in the last 2 years. In a public interview, CEO mentioned that they install their own meters below cost so competitors can't get theirs in.
A very good fundamentalist would have thought ACCC is on their tails - a conclusion that can easily be arrived at in hindsight. The fundamentalist will exit the trade as soon as ACCC news is out.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.