- Joined
- 7 December 2006
- Posts
- 254
- Reactions
- 0
juiceman, I'm a bit overweight on INL now too, after recently buying 20,000 more at 15c (which in hindsight was a bad decision, should have waited a bit longer!)
I agree on the metals forecasting, to me it seems that they are simply saying that prices always return to the mean, and that they are due to do so.... They are making the assumption that there will be a significant ramp up in production of zinc to match the demand (and perhaps that demand will fall off somewhat)... but what happens if the demand keeps growing?? I don't have a crystal ball, but having been to China, I don't see their appetite being satisfied any time soon, if anything I think demand will continue to increase
I think this paragraph from the report is an interesting one too.
If you do the sums on this, then the sp comes out at 23c as the NPV for the concentrate component goes from 25 Million to 75 million effectively taking the value to close to 150 Million instead of 100 Million (numbers all rounded for ease of interpretation ) And this STILL does not really take into account the upside potential of the technology, IHRP etc (though that do have 20 Million NPV stuffed in there to cover that).
Of course this is just another snippet of info from the report, and a balanced view can only be obtained by reading the whole report, and applying that against other information as well, after all that it could still be wrong But to me it seems that Maccas have pretty much ignored the IHRP as well as other things, but have put enough "but's" in the report to cover themselves should it outperform their "base case" analysis
Tony.
I agree on the metals forecasting, to me it seems that they are simply saying that prices always return to the mean, and that they are due to do so.... They are making the assumption that there will be a significant ramp up in production of zinc to match the demand (and perhaps that demand will fall off somewhat)... but what happens if the demand keeps growing?? I don't have a crystal ball, but having been to China, I don't see their appetite being satisfied any time soon, if anything I think demand will continue to increase
I think this paragraph from the report is an interesting one too.
Where we may be conservative:
! Our metals price outlook. If we assume flat future zinc
prices of US$1.50/lb, our DCF valuation triples to
~$75m. Currently, zinc inventories are at record low
levels, and there may be risk to the upside of our
forecast in the near term. For further discussion on our
zinc price outlook, see commodity section below.
If you do the sums on this, then the sp comes out at 23c as the NPV for the concentrate component goes from 25 Million to 75 million effectively taking the value to close to 150 Million instead of 100 Million (numbers all rounded for ease of interpretation ) And this STILL does not really take into account the upside potential of the technology, IHRP etc (though that do have 20 Million NPV stuffed in there to cover that).
Of course this is just another snippet of info from the report, and a balanced view can only be obtained by reading the whole report, and applying that against other information as well, after all that it could still be wrong But to me it seems that Maccas have pretty much ignored the IHRP as well as other things, but have put enough "but's" in the report to cover themselves should it outperform their "base case" analysis
Tony.