This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Resisting Climate Hysteria


No, it's and Australian only chart and earthquakes don't increase in it at all.
I agree with Andrew Bolt about the chart he was commenting on. The data seems wrong - or there is some bias creeping in whether it is low reportage or change in parameters. Frankly, it look like rubbish.

The Australian chart on the other hand done by business people in Europe looks much more professional and is no where near as steep.
 
Economist, Ross Garnaut says, in relation to man-made extreme weather events;

"You ain't seen nothing yet."

He is claiming the high moral ground.

Perhaps it will get as bad as the 1890's, when nature, not man, caused five major floods in Brisbane.
 
As I've said before, you know what to expect from Mike Carlton on climate change. Strong on polemic, short on research, this Bob Brown disciple. By contrast Lord Monckton is noted as an '..idiotic British peer and coolist..'

I think Carlton likes to be provocative: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/socie...ts-time-for-a-cold-shower-20110204-1agt8.html - Flat-earthers, it's time for a cold shower, February 5, 2011

Says Carlton '..Given this catalogue of global disaster, would now be a good time for the climate change flat-earthers to shut up and listen, do you think? Just for a day or two, or even five minutes?
They won't, of course. The global warming denialists ignore the great body of world scientific opinion. When the Queensland catastrophe leaves the headlines the local lot will be at it again, barfing up their crackpot notions..'

And another gem '..A lot of the denialist stupidity is ideological..'

I think it's clear who is who is 'beyond help' here.
 

Kindergarten stuff really. He bags the likes of O'Reilly (deservedly), but employing basically the same tactics. Stunning irony.
 

I do get a good laugh out of Carlron as a lot I think is tongue in cheek but this point is valid


He left out the fact of commercial / media interests working this crowd of bogan nongs
 
Oh couldn't leave without throwing this bit in wrong thread I know



http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/socie...ts-time-for-a-cold-shower-20110204-1agt8.html
 
Its stopped raining, and its a beautiful day, though a bit cloudy, nice breeze, not a Green in sight.

gg
 
February 2, 2011
Arctic Oscillation brings record low January extent, unusual mid-latitude weather

Overview of conditions


January 2011 compared to past years


http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
 
It is perhaps one of the most beautiful evenings here in Townsville, so strange after the last weeks' storms.

A gentle breeze, blue sky, occasional distant cloud, about 26 degrees I'd guess , possibly 30 in the sun, birds are back, children playing in the pool.

All is well with the world, as it has been , and will be in the future.

gg
 
I know some here don't like Bolt, but are these facts correct?


http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion...-beat-their-drum/story-e6frfifx-1226000403114

The article lists a range of historical weather facts and explains that Professor Ross Garnaut is an economist. I thought he must have been a scientist, is that assumption incorrect?

If the above is true and there have been worse weather conditions than seen recently, doesn't that once again point to the likelihood that we are experiencing cycles in severe weather and are simply being hoodwinked for revenue raising?
 
Sails, yes, according to charts I've seen the two events you mention were indeed worse than current, so can hardly be attributed in those times to 'climate change'.

And yes, Professor Garnaut is an economist.

Go figure, as the Americans would say.
 
Sails, yes, according to charts I've seen the two events you mention were indeed worse than current, so can hardly be attributed in those times to 'climate change'.

And yes, Professor Garnaut is an economist.

Go figure, as the Americans would say.

Thanks for the confirmation, Julia...

Yes, on so many counts this whole climate change thing is looking increasingly dodgy. I have never been convinced of it, largely because I'm suspicious when governments find a controversial issue to increase taxes. My skeptisism is steadily increasing on this and several other current issues...
 
This issue is so yesterday. 'FlimFlammerys' indeed!

With thanks to the Tim Blair Blog (my bolds):
http://blogs.news.com.au/dailyteleg...aph/comments/chief_commissioner/#commentsmore
"...Careful Tim. With a picture like that, some might decide that swapping the Windsors for the FlimFlammerys is the constitutional change they crave. A Gaia-given right to rule the lower classes, plus outrageous clobber for our new bunyip aristocrats like Baron Garnaut, Duchess Deveney, Sir Andrew Pitman and Lady Marieke Hardy (inherited title from gramps) will swing a lot of lefties. Needless to say, when king Timbo ordains Cardinal Brown to head the new state religion he will exhibit the mercy of Samual Marsden to non-believers, while looking rather fetching in red.
But what of our jobs, the proles will cry.... “let them serve Lattes” came down from on high.
MiltonG of Brisbane (Reply)
Thu 10 Feb 11 (01:53pm)
Flannery’s PhD is in Paleontology.
His thesis was on macropod evolution.
..."
 
It would be nice if they chose one of the climate scientists from the Bureau of Meterology, or Nasa etc. Maybe the government thinks they haven't got the right skill set.

One thing Tim does have is a scientific background. He can read graphs showing the world is warming, the artic ice cap is melting, etc.

The critiscism seems to be that believing climate change is like being in a religion presumably being that it is based on faith and there are no facts.

In fact it is the opposite, the climate deniers are ignoring the evidence and believing the prophets of the Murdoch press mainpulating public opinion and sponsored priests. all have been exposed as frauds or corrupt one by one. Instead of attacking us all the time, read the graphs (published on this page) and tell us why we are wrong!!!!!

Is it too much to argue facts?
 
...Is it too much to argue facts?

So why do the climate change fanatics claim climate change has been the cause of the recent natural disasters?

How do they explain the even worse disasters in the last hundred years? It doesn't make sense.

I clearly remember when my kids were young and we were holidaying at the beach. It was pouring with rain and the weather news continually stated a clear, sunny day. The frequent comments from the kids were: "If the weather people would just put their heads outside they might learn something".

Obviously the weather bureau's "charts" were up the creek...

I think that logic still applies today and even more so when there's a tax involved...
 
Is it too much to argue facts?

FACT -

Thus far in Feb alone we have recorded 235mm in our backyard rain guage at Wodonga. More rain is falling as I type - another 20mm or so by tonight.

Long term records show Hume Dam weather station has only ever recorded one Feb total above 200mm - being 201.2mm in 1939. The long term mean rainfall for Hume Dam in Feb is 41.3!

That means so far after only 11 days, we here have experienced well over [size=+1]5 x[/size] the annual Feb average rainfall & smashed the previous Feb record in 1939, going back to when records began in 1922!

The local House Creek has flooded badly 3 times - today being the latest.

Arguably, my opinion would be useless & pointless.

Splash on....

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...