- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,667
- Reactions
- 7,518
Peter Ridd is a scientist, Ian plimer is a scientist, Bjorn Lomberg is a scientist , Roy Spencer is a scientist,patrick Michaels is a scientist, Fred Singer is a scientist, Judith Curry is a scientist, as are the father and son Pielke duo.Twiggy Forrest is a scientist. A real one actually with a Phd . So he understands and respects scientific understanding.
Extremely Hot, Humid Weather Could Kill a Person Far More Easily Than We Thought
Health07 March 2022
By Carly Cassella
View attachment 161686 (Aliraza Khatri's Photography/Getty Images)
The human body might not cope with nearly as much heat and humidity as theory predicts.
One of the first studies to directly assess humid heat stress among young people has found that when humidity is at an absolute max, the upper limit of human adaptability is just 31°C (87 °F).
That's four degrees less than theoretical estimates, and for older people, the threshold is probably even lower.
Because humans cool themselves through evaporative cooling (as in, the sweat on your skin helps to cool you down), it's important to understand 'wet-bulb temperature', which incorporates both heat and humidity – the more humidity in the air relative to heat, the harder it is for evaporation to work.
Compared to hot and dry climates, the human body cannot withstand hot and humid climates nearly as well. That's because at 100 percent humidity, our sweat cannot dissipate as easily to cool our bodies down.
In an absolutely dry environment, the human threshold for survival is probably around 50 °C. But for a completely humid environment, the new results suggest temperatures need only reach 31 °C before our bodies go into heat stroke.
With prolonged exposure to such conditions, death is inevitable.
Extremely Hot, Humid Weather Could Kill a Person Far More Easily Than We Thought
The human body might not cope with nearly as much heat and humidity as theory predicts.www.sciencealert.com
Having lived in the the trop[ics for a few years, the humidity can be quite sapping.
But then again, vast swathes of the population in the tropics have been living in high humidity for a long time, its not like its a new phenomenon.
Lucky all those spare bits I have inserted into my limbs are all titanium and not ferrous based, i would rust away.
Mick
It's amazing how people have lived in Darwin for 65,000 years and there's no records of them combusting due to the heat and lethal humidity. Must say, I lived there for three years and I did not enjoy the build up to the wet season and playing footy in the middle of the day. Took quite a lot of hydrating. I can't recall anyone exploding.
I spent pretty much all of 2015 in Iraq and the wet bulb temp was regularly over 50 degrees. It peaked at 61.2 degrees one day. Bloody hell it was hot, but I didn't melt into the sand.
How many more people die due to cold compared to heat? It's 20 x or something isn't it? We're going to be in lots of trouble when we slide into the next ice age. I wonder what humanity's solution is going to be when the entire northern hemisphere is covered in ice.
It was 29° here yesterday and only 22° today... It must be working!
It was 29° here yesterday and only 22° today... It must be working!
I call BS on this one.This is going to change the Earth's temperature.
Same as the "Just Stop Oil" morons blocking roads. Arrest them all. Also those inciting them with BS alarmism.I call BS on this one.
The action itself that is not your comment.
Deliberately immobilising vehicles has potentially serious consequences. It's only a matter of time until the targeted vehicle just happens to be the one used by someone who's on-call from home for emergency work be it medical, trades, SES, volunteer firefighters or whatever.
They can't get to work because the vehicle was tampered with and the end result is someone's harmed or there's community disruption, environmental damage or whatever sufficient that government deems it a police matter to find and prosecute those responsible. Either that or there's a woman gone into labour or someone's pet's injured and needs to be rushed to the vet or whatever.
This isn't going to get the public on side with the issue, quite the opposite, and I suspect whoever's really behind it is well aware of that. This isn't legitimate concern for the environment, it's simply outright vandalism intended to sway public sentiment.
These clowns need the book thrown at them big time.
This topic has been opened and discussed in other threads. Yes the Re-insurance industry was one of the first major commercial entities to recognise the impact climate change would have risk management of their business.This discussion has been running for so long now that is interesting to go back to prior comments:
This is from Julia (R.I.P) from 2009
"An example was the headlines today that coastal inundation is going to affect hundreds of thousands of households and businesses.
Only at the end of the report of the study (which of course once again just is based on computer modelling) is it pointed out that this - even if it happens - will be at least 100 years away.
I wonder if an opposing scientific view (and there will be plenty) will ever make it to print and/or broadcast?"
I am surprised that people are not discussing the elephant in the room, which will surely cause changes.
The insurance industry and the cost to reinsure, coastal zones, flood zones, fire zones, etc.
They are not basing their data on hearsay.
In no particular order it basically comes down to:The UK have done pretty well in reducing their emissions. I'm surprised to see they're lower than ours by about 50M tonnes. Not sure how they've managed that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?