explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,197
I'll be interested to hear. I mean if you believe scientists have altered their stance for grants then surely you would be equally open to scientists change in position due to big oil etc payments.
Easy, warmer at the two poles is causing displacement (in our case from the south) and therefore the increasingly unstable, unpredictable weather. Get used to it as its going to get worse.Queensland, Australia, 22nd of November 2017. Just walked outside house and quickly returned inside due to cool natural air temperatures. Cool air temperatures that have continued throughout this November 2017 and are not expected this time of year. Meanwhile inTassie which is 1600 klm closer to Antarctica ....
"The weather bureau's Tim Bolden said it was shaping up to be the first time Hobart has recorded six consecutive days on or above 25 degrees Celsius in November in nearly 130 years."
Work that one out.
Tassie does get hot on occasion, the all time record for Hobart is 41.8, but what we're getting at the moment is abnormal that's for sure."The weather bureau's Tim Bolden said it was shaping up to be the first time Hobart has recorded six consecutive days on or above 25 degrees Celsius in November in nearly 130 years."
Work that one out.
Easy, warmer at the two poles is causing displacement (in our case from the south) and therefore the increasingly unstable, unpredictable weather. Get used to it as its going to get worse.
Winning: UA ordered to surrender emails to skeptics of human-caused climate change
By: Anthony Watts, 8 December 2017
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/12...s-to-skeptics-of-human-caused-climate-change/
PHOENIX — The University of Arizona has been ordered to surrender emails by two UA scientists that a group claims will help prove that theories about human-caused climate change are false and part of a conspiracy.
Pima County Superior Court Judge James Marner rejected arguments by the Board of Regents that disclosure of the documents would be “contrary to the best interests of the state.” ...
I think that joke does the climate scientist a serious injustice. Every climate scientist knows that the answer can only be the one that supports, and confirms, the AGW theory. Furthermore, those producing a disagreeable answer, are clearly not qualified to practice mathematics.An Engineer, a Mathematician and a “Climate scientist” are each asked “what is 2 + 2?
The Engineer says “somewhere between 3.9 and 4.1”, the Mathematician says “4” and the “Climate scientist” says “what would you like it to be?”
This is the problem we have today. “Climate change” can be anything you want if you are a “follower” ...
Quoted from:
David Bidstrup: What is 2 + 2? An old joke re-told.
http://catallaxyfiles.com/2017/12/15/david-bidstrup-what-is-2-2-an-old-joke-re-told/
They should also be arrested, or blown up or something.I think that joke does the climate scientist a serious injustice. Every climate scientist knows that the answer can only be the one that supports, and confirms, the AGW theory. Furthermore, those producing a disagreeable answer, are clearly not qualified to practice mathematics.
They should also be arrested, or blown up or something.
It is wonderful to see you finally voicing some support for the sceptic camp.And so it has descended to this; Don't like the message shoot the messenger ....
Getting a bit hard to bang your square facts into your round holes boys?
Mathematics ??? Great to see the immediately above posters are at least up to speed with an early primary level understanding of the subject... credit where credit due. Are you all getting those coloured(square) rods back in the box Ok? or do you all have personalised round boxes? and that's where to trouble started?
did you misunderstand the context underlying wayne's response to my post?
You voiced criticism of the messenger shooting practice, and yet you somehow fail to recognise that, on this occasion , wayne's comment was in relation to the plight of the heretical sceptics (not the alarmists).I'm not the sharpest pencil in the box, I must have and I'll admit I still do. So get me up to speed.
...
Arctic global warming so rapid that computer measuring it rejected the results
Algorithm meant to be triggered if there is a fault in Alaskan recording equipment stops temperature recording because measurements were too high.
http://www.independent.co.uk/enviro...-rapid-computer-rejected-alaska-a8110941.html
So everything is having a problem with it hey. Maybe we'd do better by accepting the facts and all doing something about it.
So, do you need me to assist you further with your rod?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?