Resisting Climate Hysteria

[Logique]

This is disgraceful bullying and misogyny against a female climatologist.

Leave Valentina alone, you warmist misogynists!

Physicist who foresees global cooling says other scientists tried to ‘silence’ her
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/10/physicist-who-foresees-global-cooling-says-other-s/

A physicist who foresees a 30-year period of global cooling says other climatologists have tried to “silence” her latest research on solar cycles.

Valentina Zharkova, a professor at Northumbria University at Newcastle in the United Kingdom, said the Royal Astronomical Society received requests to withdraw a press release on her team’s latest research pointing to a significant drop in solar activity by mid-century...

 

[basilio]

Now all we need are some court rulings to save our immortal souls from eternal damnation in the lake of burning sulphur!

Now, now! We all know that many harbour doubts about the existence of Lucifer, but nobody can prove his non existence, and the consequences of being mistaken in this case could be sufficiently severe (eternal damnation) to render inaction unwise.

So we had better petition the courts to start ruling for enforcement of regular repentance by the entire populace, just in case!

Off to the confessionals everyone!

Creative Cynic. Very creative.

Of course in this case the judges investigated the evidence around CC and decided that in fact, on the evidence, it was very real and largely caused by human actions.

And then they decided that governments had a duty of care to their citizens to protect them from severe but avoidable harm and were thus under obligation to address the problem.

Just not quite the same as Lucifer as it ?

The Dutch Climate Case: Beginning of a New Era of Climate Litigation?

In a worldwide first, the Hague District Court has ordered the Dutch government to cut its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) by at least 25% compared to 1990 levels by the end of 2020. The decision, an English translation of which can be found here, has been widely reported and discussed (including in an interview on CBC Radio’s The Current with Dianne). It has rekindled hopes around the world that courts can spur governments into taking serious steps to deal with climate change.

https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnew...nning-of-a-new-era-of-climate-litigation.aspx

 

[cynic]

Creative Cynic. Very creative.

Of course in this case the judges investigated the evidence around CC and decided that in fact, on the evidence, it was very real and largely caused by human actions.

And then they decided that governments had a duty of care to their citizens to protect them from severe but avoidable harm and were thus under obligation to address the problem.

Just not quite the same as Lucifer as it ?


https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnew...nning-of-a-new-era-of-climate-litigation.aspx

You are correct! The case for the existence of Lucifer has greater merit!

As has been said before, the judges' expertise and training is predominantly legal, not scientific! Their determinations usually depend very heavily on the honesty of those presenting their respective cases.

Before presenting one's case at court, which particular tome is one required to place one's hand over and swear an oath to telling the truth?

And amongst other things, which particular beings does aforementioned tome attest to the existence of?

 

[trainspotter]

Many a person is in jail for a crime they did not commit basilio ...

“It’s frightening how easy it is to convict an innocent person in this country,” Ms. Saifee said. “And it’s overwhelmingly difficult to release an innocent person.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/11/n...after-25-years-in-prison-for-murder.html?_r=0

I liken it to more of the tail wagging the dog syndrome.

 

[basilio]

Malcolm Roberts newly elected One nation Senator was on Q & A last night. Not surprisingly he opened up with a flat denunciation of current climate science because "they don't have the empirical evidence".

But the real conspiracy was arguing that all the meteorologist organisation around the world were deliberately corrupting their data to create a totally false picture of world temperatures.

And this guy is in our Parliament

Malcolm Roberts leaves NASA 'flummoxed' with Q&A climate claims
Peter Hannam


It probably takes a lot to faze Gavin Schmidt, the head of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies, but the outlandish views of Malcolm Roberts, the newly elected One Nation senator, can do it from half a world away.

On Monday night's Q&A program on the ABC, Roberts was venting his now well-worn view that there was no empirical evidence of climate change.

......Anyway, when Cox pulled out some charts on Q&A from US space agency NASA showing a clear upward trend in global temperatures, Roberts readily dismissed the data as "corrupted" and "manipulated".

Roberts' argument, apparently, is that the world was hotter in the 1930s but NASA had altered the figures to make the current era look warmer. (According to one take the issue is whether continental US was warmer in 1934 than in the hot years of 1998 or 2006 - but 2012 then blew all previous records away.)

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/envi...15-gqt9a4.html

(Excellent video on the link)

 

[basilio]

Another take on Malcolm Roberts inglorious efforts to deny the bleeding obvious.

Malcolm Roberts' embarrassing clash with physicist Brian Cox

Neil McMahon

179 reading now

In searching for a moral from the story of Monday's Q&A - and the debut of a One Nation senator earning rave reviews for his revival of Queensland's finest vaudevillian traditions - let's tap the history books: the lesson of the Queen and the farting corgi.

.....Which brings us to Q&A debutante Malcolm Roberts, whose bursts of intellectual wind are often of the kind that make you want to move away in a hurry while shouting loudly at the world: "It wasn't us! It was him!", to which the world will nod sympathetically and say, "Who else?"

That's the hope anyway; but what if they don't and instead start looking at us like we're all barmy?

The question arose repeatedly on Q&A as Roberts delivered us the national embarrassment of rock star physicist Brian Cox having to put his eyes back in their sockets over and again as Roberts threw one conspiracy theory at him after another. When eyes weren't popping, they were rolling. Other panellists were aghast. Even host Tony Jones felt moved to clarify things in stark terms.

Jones: "You are hearing the interpretation of a highly qualified scientist and you're saying, "'I don't believe that' - is that right?"

It was.

http://www.watoday.com.au/entertain...with-physicist-brian-cox-20160815-gqt941.html

 

[trainspotter]

Trainspotted a while ago basilio ....

 

[explod]

Another take on Malcolm Roberts inglorious efforts to deny the bleeding obvious.
]

He's a joke and the exposure will help us get to the real task of trying to combat the causes of climate change full on.

 

[noco]

He's a joke and the exposure will help us get to the real task of trying to combat the causes of climate change full on.

How many times do you have to be told......It is the SUN.....The joke was on the mad professor from England.

 

[wayneL]

He's a joke and the exposure will help us get to the real task of trying to combat the causes of climate change full on.

....and, Mr Cox has a public career to protect

 

[noco]

I know I have posted this before, but it obvious the Alarmist on this Forum have either not bothered to read or decided to completely ignore it.

CLIMATE CHANGE IS ALL ABOUT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SUN.



New post on cairnsnews.org



WA engineer destroys global warming myth
by cairnsnews



Miranda Devine
Respected journalist Miranda Devine published the article below October 4, 2015, throws engineered evidence supporting taxpayer funded environmentalist empires selling global warming/ CO2 doomsday/climate change Armageddon to instigate damage control protection of their gravy train.
Dr David Evans makes this statement in the video below that is a must view for concerned Australians - “Official climate science, which is funded and directed entirely by government, promotes a theory that is based on a guess about moist air that is now a known falsehood. Governments gleefully accept their advice, because the only way to curb emissions are to impose taxes and extend government control over all energy use. And to curb emissions on a world scale might even lead to world government ”” how exciting for the political class!”

Harry Palmer - sosnews.org

Source: Miranda Devine- Perth Now - news.com.au - October 4, 2015
A MATHEMATICAL discovery by Perth-based electrical engineer Dr David Evans may change everything about the climate debate, on the eve of the UN climate change conference in Paris next month.
A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
Dr Evans says his discovery “ought to change the world”.
“But the political obstacles are massive,” he said.
His discovery explains why none of the climate models used by the IPCC reflect the evidence of recorded temperatures. The models have failed to predict the pause in global warming which has been going on for 18 years and counting.
“The model architecture was wrong,” he says. “Carbon dioxide causes only minor warming. The climate is largely driven by factors outside our control.”
There is another problem with the original climate model, which has been around since 1896.
While climate scientists have been predicting since the 1990s that changes in temperature would follow changes in carbon dioxide, the records over the past half million years show that not to be the case.
So, the new improved climate model shows CO2 is not the culprit in recent global warming. But what is?
Dr Evans has a theory: solar activity. What he calls “albedo modulation”, the waxing and waning of reflected radiation from the Sun, is the likely cause of global warming.
He predicts global temperatures, which have plateaued, will begin to cool significantly, beginning between 2017 and 2021. The cooling will be about 0.3C in the 2020s. Some scientists have even forecast a mini ice age in the 2030s.
If Dr Evans is correct, then he has proven the theory on carbon dioxide wrong and blown a hole in climate alarmism. He will have explained why the doomsday predictions of climate scientists aren't reflected in the actual temperatures.


Dr David Evans, who says climate model architecture is wrong, with wife Jo Nova who hosts climate change skeptics blog - joannenova.com.au
Dr David Evans, who says climate model architecture is wrong, with wife Jo Nova, Picture: australianclimatemadness.com
“It took me years to figure this out, but finally there is a potential resolution between the insistence of the climate scientists that CO2 is a big problem, and the empirical evidence that it doesn’t have nearly as much effect as they say.”
Dr Evans is an expert in Fourier analysis and digital signal processing, with a PhD, and two Masters degrees from Stanford University in electrical engineering, a Bachelor of Engineering (for which he won the University medal), Bachelor of Science, and Masters in Applied Maths from the University of Sydney.
He has been summarising his results in a series of blog posts on his wife Jo Nova’s blog for climate sceptics.
He is about half way through his series, with blog post 8, “Applying the Stefan-Boltzmann Law to Earth”, published on Friday.
When it is completed his work will be published as two scientific papers. Both papers are undergoing peer review.
“It’s a new paradigm,” he says. “It has several new ideas for people to get used to.”
Editorial:
Unable to find any peer review for Dr Evans findings does not dismiss those finding. It does however keep the gate wide open for environment engineers and their loyal supporters of the gravy train environmental express.
Further, peer review factor is the current tool of the loony greens which is understandable when they develop climate change doom reports having it endorsed only by capitulating peer review.
Posted 2011 - Dr Evans four fatal pieces of evidence- http://joannenova.com.au/2011/09/dr-david-evans-four-fatal-pieces-of-evidence/
posted 2011 - Unknown climate change supporters opinion to Dr Evans - http://www.skepticalscience.com/david-evans-understanding-goes-cold.html
Harry Palmer

cairnsnews | August 1, 2016 at 11:33 am | Tags: Climate Change Skeptics, Dr David Evans, Environmental Fictional Engineering, government corruption | Categories: Agenda 2030, Climate Change, corruption, environment engineering, Global warming, mythmanagement, New World Order, People Control | URL: http://wp.me/p2dFb5-1YG
Comment
See all comments

 

[basilio]

Just pure and utter rubbish Noco. You clearly don't realise it but that doesn't change the facts.

David Evans long involved treatise has validity only in his mind and the other people subject to his delusions.

 

[cynic]

Just pure and utter rubbish Noco. You clearly don't realise it but that doesn't change the facts.

David Evans long involved treatise has validity only in his mind and the other people subject to his delusions.

Couldn't the same statement be accurately made of many of the climate alarmists?

 

[noco]

Couldn't the same statement be accurately made of many of the climate alarmists?

Oh No Cynic...You are not allowed to do that......The Alarmist are always right and everyone else speaks rubbish according to Basillio????????????????.....No matter what facts you throw up these Greenies they are so brainwashed into believing their masters from the UN that they dare not veer away from the the UN bible......I am sure if the UN told them to put their heads in a fire, they would do so....It is such a shame...I do feel sorry for these people.

 

[noco]

Just pure and utter rubbish Noco. You clearly don't realise it but that doesn't change the facts.

David Evans long involved treatise has validity only in his mind and the other people subject to his delusions.

It is very easy to say it is rubbish but you do not give a reason for saying such words.......It is well known the "FACTS" which you keep presenting are distorted and exaggerated and you cannot deny it......To harp on the idea that these so called Climate scientist have their work peer reviewed is all about the amount of money they are paid and they will keep doing it so long as their bank balance increases.

This whole Global Warming scare is a scam.

 

[trainspotter]

Just pure and utter rubbish Noco. You clearly don't realise it but that doesn't change the facts.

David Evans long involved treatise has validity only in his mind and the other people subject to his delusions.

Got any FACTS to back this up basilio? This guy is obviously a DUNCE and should be discredited IMMEDIATELY !

Dr David Evans consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to 2010, modeling Australia's carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural products.

Evans is a mathematician and engineer. The area of human endeavor with the most experience and sophistication in dealing with feedbacks and analyzing complex systems is electrical engineering, and the most crucial and disputed aspects of understanding the climate system are the feedbacks. He believes the evidence supporting the idea that CO2 emissions were the main cause of global warming reversed itself from 1998 to 2006, causing Evans to move from being a warmist to a sceptic.

http://www.abc.net.au/tv/changeyourmind/s3456871.htm

 

[orr]

Another take on Malcolm Roberts ..................

Buried in Roberts crank-mania are the seeds of his own destruction with regard his CC belligerence. I his Q&A performance for a short while he reflected on education and made the direct point to the importance of teaching children not what to think, but how to think. In this all power to his arm; The elevation of critical thinking....

Anybody with this capacity would within a moments thought, see the bazaar nature of a conspiracy theory involving so many disparate and disconnected independent sources all coming to a similar conclusion for some nefarious end that then somehow benefits an international banking cabal, those long term bent is world domination through manipulation of the United Nations. As is Roberts delusion.

Maybe WayneL can point out, privately, to Roberts how Exxon and Koch brothers studies work in these parameters, in aligning with all these other infiltrated scientific research insto's and confirms their findings .... Information your keen to keep close to your chest...
Hang on I know the answer; Obviously penetrated by moles and sleeper agents. This thing just keeps getting bigger...
My god now I see it it's all true . AAAAHhhhhhhhhhhhh.........

Recommended reading on this from 'Catch-22' 344mm Leparge Gun;
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/180427-they-began-to-invent-humourless-glum-jokes-of-their-own

 

[basilio]

Got any FACTS to back this up basilio? This guy is obviously a DUNCE and should be discredited IMMEDIATELY !

View attachment 67784



http://www.abc.net.au/tv/changeyourmind/s3456871.htm

Too many people on this thread will believe what they want to believe re the causes and reality of global warming.

For those who are interested you can check these detailed breakdowns of David Evans misinformation re CC

http://www.skepticalscience.com/david-evans-understanding-goes-cold.html
https://debunkingdenialism.com/2012...s-in-david-evans-case-against-global-warming/

 

[wayneL]

Too many people on this thread will believe what they want to believe re the causes and reality of global warming.

For those who are interested you can check these detailed breakdowns of David Evans misinformation re CC

http://www.skepticalscience.com/david-evans-understanding-goes-cold.html
https://debunkingdenialism.com/2012...s-in-david-evans-case-against-global-warming/

Neither of which have any credibility.

The irony.

 

[wayneL]

Buried in Roberts crank-mania are the seeds of his own destruction with regard his CC belligerence. I his Q&A performance for a short while he reflected on education and made the direct point to the importance of teaching children not what to think, but how to think. In this all power to his arm; The elevation of critical thinking....

Anybody with this capacity would within a moments thought, see the bazaar nature of a conspiracy theory involving so many disparate and disconnected independent sources all coming to a similar conclusion for some nefarious end that then somehow benefits an international banking cabal, those long term bent is world domination through manipulation of the United Nations. As is Roberts delusion.

Maybe WayneL can point out, privately, to Roberts how Exxon and Koch brothers studies work in these parameters, in aligning with all these other infiltrated scientific research insto's and confirms their findings .... Information your keen to keep close to your chest...
Hang on I know the answer; Obviously penetrated by moles and sleeper agents. This thing just keeps getting bigger...
My god now I see it it's all true . AAAAHhhhhhhhhhhhh.........

Recommended reading on this from 'Catch-22' 344mm Leparge Gun;
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/180427-they-began-to-invent-humourless-glum-jokes-of-their-own

It's nice to know you're thinking of me orr, but you'll have to do better than an intellectual spit wad and lacky band to be anything more than a mild annoyance. Good luck with it