- Joined
- 25 February 2011
- Posts
- 5,688
- Reactions
- 1,231
Unfortunately, there seems to be an ever increasing amount of evidence suggesting that they do indeed merit such accusations.
...Your accusing the whole climate science and related studies community of being corrupt and crazy.
Unfortunately, there seems to be an ever increasing amount of evidence suggesting that they do indeed merit such accusations.
B]Past 150,000 Years of Sea Level History Suggests High Rates of Future Sea Level Rise
Posted on 7 December 2012 by Rob Painting[/B]
Key points
An accurately dated, near-continuous, history of sea level variations for the last 150,000 years has been compiled.
Comparison with ice core data reveals that major global ice volume loss, as implied by sea level rise, has followed relatively quickly after polar warming. The Greenland ice sheet responding virtually straight away (0-100 years lag time), and a 400-700 lag for the Antarctic ice sheet.
These response times are much faster than was previously commonly suspected, and implies that once sufficient polar warming is underway, future ice sheet collapse may be unavoidable.
During all episodes of major global ice loss, sea level rise has reached rates of at least 1.2 metres per century (equivalent to 12 mm per year). This is 4 times the current rate of sea level rise.
.....
Connecting Dots ”” The News in Perspective
Why the New Sea Level Alarm Can't Be Ignored
The physics of ice predicts that sea level will rise twice as much by the end of the century as previously estimated
PUBLISHED April 1, 2016
There are days when even a born optimist starts to waver in his conviction. The release of a new study projecting that sea level could rise between five and six feet by 2100””when many children born today will still be alive and have been forced to move inland””made Thursday one of those days
Thankyou basilio for so amply demonstrating the veracity of my previous post.And what does the most recent analysis of the Antarctic Ice sheets tell us about the risk of rapidly rising sea levels ?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...change-sea-level-antarctica-ice-melt-physics/
BS...
Not impressed Wayne... Keep yourself nice..:frown:
I'll accept that you have strong environmental concerns. But that puzzles me even further because that suggest you read widely and are well capable of understanding complex ideas. And of course that you care.
And then we come to global warming and climate change... Somehow you manage to resolutely ignore every piece of evidence that shows the temperature around the globe is rising at an unparalleled rate to levels not seen for hundreds of thousands of years
You resolutely ignore the work of glaciologists that shows the effects such temperature increase had on ice caps when temperatures were at those levels. Ocean levels were many metres higher than today.
And finally you appear to reject any significant connection between rapidly increasing green house gases and the increase in temperatures. (Of course if you say temperatures aren't actually at record levels you can keep a fig leaf of logic can't you. Shame about the facts though..)
And in the end what do you do ? You arn't just insulting me Wayne by saying I need to go to a psychiatrist. I am just relating the work of the overwhelming body of science on the subject. Your accusing the whole climate science and related studies community of being corrupt and crazy.
During all episodes of major global ice loss, sea level rise has reached rates of at least 1.2 metres per century (equivalent to 12 mm per year). This is 4 times the current rate of sea level rise.
It also appears that, whatever acceptance you have of global warming, it does not acknowledge the extreme measure of growth in the past 100 years in comparison to the the previous relatively stable period.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/sea-level-rise-predictions.htmA draft version of the next report from the IPCC (AR5), due for publication in 2014, was recently leaked. Although the information is subject to change, the draft report says sea levels are likely to rise by between 29 and 82 centimeters by the end of the century, (compared to 18-59 centimeters in the 2007 report).
I'm puzzled at your comments TS. Are you saying that a rise in sea levels of 1.2 metres in 100 years (12mm a year ) is inconsequential ? For some sort of comparison consider the forecast of the current IPCC
https://www.skepticalscience.com/sea-level-rise-predictions.htm
What would be the consequences of a 1.2 m increase in sea levels within 100 years ? Basically many coastal cities would be overwhelmed and effectively unlivable. Is that an acceptable scenario ?
"DERP" and "DOLT" sort of like swearing when you can't get you own way or trying to convince youself teee ssss.
Five billion years ago this earth was a gaseous fireball. Gradually it is cooling down but still some fire inside. This information is not from any other source but my head, what one learns from school and over life.
So we should be in increasingly colder conditions and more prolonged ice ages. But this is not happenning, against all this, as well as increased cloud due to warmer air (which should also cooling) it is getting hotter. This is man made climate change and a major part of this from the burning of fossil fuels. The other of course is the loss of forrests.
None of this alters the fact that the north pole last winter was up to 40c warmer than normal WHEN THE EARTH IS SUPPOSED TO BE COOLING ole derp.I have much better words for you explod as you are in the same category as basilio with your inability to comprehend the written word.
Try this on for size then shall we ... Although it is often asserted that the Moon "controls" the tides, this is really an oversimplification of the tidal system. In fact there are many factors which determine the tides, including the moon, the sun, the rotation of the earth, the geomorphology of the ocean basin, and the location of the particular spot where you're measuring the tide along that basin. All of these factors interact in a complex way to determine the specifics of the tide's characteristics at each location on Earth.
So if the Moon is moving away from Earth what do you think will happen to the tides? Don't forget that the "ocean is rising" theory has been measured by TIDAL GAUGES for the last hundred years or so
Derp:- Used as a substitute for speech regarded as meaningless or stupid, or to comment on a foolish or stupid action
None of this alters the fact that the north pole last winter was up to 40c warmer than normal WHEN THE EARTH IS SUPPOSED TO BE COOLING ole derp.
The moon, sun and all the other naural effects are counted by science in the total sum.
And the lobbyists for oil, coal etc., can be shown to have effected official science output. The Murdock and Reauters press are the front of big business. And google is so stacked with crapola that facts are becomingvery difficult to duscern. That is why I follow my own instincts, knowledge and experience directly from community interaction.
Class dismissed :bonk:
Hey plod, did you hear the latest news on all those good rains in Queensland.....Must be the CO2 factor coming into play.
Townsville had it's lowest maximum of 15 c last Thursday.....I think the Sun is going blind or is it the CO2 factor also affecting the Sun.
They call it CLIMATE CHANGE.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/qld/a/32073334/rain-to-clear-across-central-qld/#page1
Yep, displacement from the poles which is co2 global warming.
Explained it to you many times so you should have it by now.
Hey plod, did you hear the latest news on all those good rains in Queensland.....Must be the CO2 factor coming into play.
Townsville had it's lowest maximum of 15 c last Thursday.....I think the Sun is going blind or is it the CO2 factor also affecting the Sun.
They call it CLIMATE CHANGE.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/qld/a/32073334/rain-to-clear-across-central-qld/#page1
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?