This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Resisting Climate Hysteria


This is a very divisive comment. We are all in agreeance that there is such a thing as global warming or climate change is it's new user friendly handle. The disagreeance is on the HYSTERIA that is generated by such statements as the ones below:-



March 29, 2001, CNN: “In ten year’s time, most of the low-lying atolls surrounding Tuvalu’s nine islands in the South Pacific Ocean will be submerged under water as global warming rises sea levels.”


http://www.smithsonianmag.com/trave...eneath-the-sea-180940704/#uD5e7g7BJEvMy8Fe.99

And now for some level headedness to prevail ...


Resist the HYSTERIA !!
 

This is the rest of the article.

Professor Bigg said the ecological impacts of the blooms would be mostly positive. “More phytoplankton would exist within a few hundred kilometres of an iceberg, giving an increased food source for species higher up the (food chain).” Scientists have long recognised that icebergs support plankton blooms, but the new paper suggests their scale has not been recognised.

Previous estimates were based on smaller icebergs restrained by sea ice off the Antarctic Peninsula, and measurements near icebergs in the ocean open.

The new study found the plankton blooms were more intense around larger icebergs, with the impacts peaking between 50km and 200km away. The plume is mostly nourished by meltwaters from the base of the icebergs which “takes a little time to rise to the surface”, the paper says.

The study was based on 175 satellite images of the open ocean around 17 giant icebergs ”” those at least 18km long ”” between 2003 and 2013. It judged plankton concentrations by tracking changes in the ocean’s colour as each iceberg passed. Chlorophyll in plankton’s cells can make the ocean appear greener.

 
Thanks Noco. I was just wondering what the whole Australian story said.

The Guardian also carried the story. Again they quoted much/most of the article as The Australian. What was interesting was how they finished off the story putting in the context of the other research on why there are now huge icebergs coming off the Antarctic.


http://www.theguardian.com/environm...s-are-slowing-climate-change-research-reveals

It's interesting how The Australian chose not to contextualise the research paper in terms of the wider analysis of what is happening in the Antarctic. I wonder how it goes to quote and agree with one scientists work but then rubbish other scientists who explain why we have so many huge icebergs calving and where that will take us..
 
Really Rumpy ? 2015 was the hottest year world wide since detailed records have been kept ?
And it totally trashed 2014 as well which was pretty well the hottest year on record.?

Should we start to take notice of what climate scientists have been saying for 30 years plus ?


http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/n...d-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015
 
With the el Nino it was always going to be a hot year. The hottest? I want to see some sober analysis first.
 
With the el Nino it was always going to be a hot year. The hottest? I want to see some sober analysis first.

The "el Nino" is the pattern with the warmer waters, but is not the cause of the warmer waters and there by the higher temperatures.

No one wants to address why the earth is not continuing to cool as it is supposed to. And for you noco the sun is continuing to cool down and the odd firestorms have never had much impact over the last half billion years or so. And I learnt that at school.
 
Vale Prof Bob Carter, a true scientist. A Royal Commission would be a good idea.

 
Vale Prof Bob Carter, a true scientist. A Royal Commission would be a good idea.

Indeed.

And for an epitome of the poisonous alarmist mentality: http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2016/01/19/science-advances-one-funeral-at-a-time/


Nice guy
 
Very sad that someone, anyone indeed should speak ill of the dead even the venerable Professor Rob Carter.

However it is worth pointing out just how mendacious Professor Carter was in his various (paid) presentations attempting to undermine the reality of global warming. It's worth exploring to the end to see just how badly Bob could torture graphs to come up with the "right" result.




And on it goes. There is some fancy footwork in the later graphs. Worth a look.

....Of course four and half years later with successive record breaking world temperature records almost everyone has seen the light ?

(NFW...)

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/bob-carter-does-his-business/
 
Torturing graphs? paid? LMAO I don't know how you can say that with a straight face.

Funny guy.
 
Fair enough Wayne. Clearly you didn't quite pick up exactly how Bob Carter tortured graphs in his presentations to dispute the realities of global warming.

Lets have a look.


There are a number of other examples in Tamino post which demonstrate just how dishonest Professor Carter was in his presentations. But if you want to believe something badly enough you can always squint.

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/bob-carter-does-his-business/
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...