- Joined
- 25 February 2011
- Posts
- 5,688
- Reactions
- 1,231
Yes, you definitely have some.
The more qualified as a scientist in the field, the more likely you come to the conclusion shown. Is that so hard to fathom?
It is like going to a doctor with heart problems, who will most likely provide the best diagnosis? the GP, the brain surgeon or the heart surgeon? Hardly a communist conspiracy
I think if he was here he would express shock that the new maximum record broken in 1990 was 113.5 degrees Farenheit! And even this year it was over 102 degrees F.
I reckon he would be wondering what his descendants were doing about it.
It is like going to a doctor with heart problems, who will most likely provide the best diagnosis? the GP, the brain surgeon or the heart surgeon? Hardly a communist conspiracy
Hardly a communist conspiracy
the only alternative ”” impossible as this may seem right now ”” is to overthrow this global economic system and all of the governments of the 1% that prop it up and replace them with a global economic democracy, a radical bottom-up political democracy, an eco-socialist civilization.
You're equating cardiology to climate "science"?
That is a false analogy as cardiology is a field where empirical science rules, climate science isn't.
Rubbish, merely a matter of time line.
That was a very interesting paper. What the authors noted was that the HadCRUT4 data had almost no measurements in the Arctic , Antarctic and a number of spots in Africa.
It has been clear for the last 15 years that the Arctic is warming at a considerably faster rate than the rest of the earth so incorporating temperature figures from the Arctic makes sense.
The delicious irony of the paper ? The source of the infill Acrtic temperatures was the satellite measurements supplied by the University of Alabama from Christy and Spencer who have repeatedly attempted to use the satellite temperature figures to refute global warming.
Nice video abstract of the paper on you tube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhJR3ywIijo
Substantiate please.
Hi overhang,http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-12-03/federal-funding-bid-for-king-island-wind-farm/5132738
"It has been revealed Hydro Tasmania wants the Federal Government to help fund its $2 billion King Island wind farm project.
The state-owned hydro electricity generator is conducting a feasibility study into its plan to build 200 wind turbines on the Bass Strait island.
The proposal for Australia's largest wind farm includes the construction of an underwater cable from King Island to Victoria."
My bolds, I'm not sure if Smurf resides in this thread but I'd like to hear is opinion on this. It's seems a bit nonsensical to run a cable across the Bass Strait when Victoria already have plenty of available. land suitable for wind farms.
Hi overhang,
Reading your post it would seem obvious that:
a.) King Island is windy.
b.) Hydro Tasmania can profit from a wind farm in Bass Strait.
c.) Nothing is stopping Victoria from getting a piece of the action.
Hi Burglar,
The thing is we actually have wind in Victoria too, I'm less than an hour drive to three separate wind farms. My concern would be at what rate would Tasmania supply power to our grid in Victoria.
In very rough terms one sixth of SA electricity comes from the coal-fired plants at Port Augusta, about half comes from gas-fired plants in the Adelaide metro area and the rest is from wind and solar.South Australia gets power from Victoria even though we have a coal fuelled power station.
Also co-gen and gas fired stations.
Its all about base-load power and a mix of Green solutions that don't yet deliver base load power
In very rough terms one sixth of SA electricity comes from the coal-fired plants at Port Augusta, about half comes from gas-fired plants in the Adelaide metro area and the rest is from wind and solar.
SA used to be heavily reliant on power from Vic, at one point it was supplying close to a third of the average load, but these days there's far less net transfer between Vic and SA.
... There's going to be an interesting energy debate in Victoria at some point.
Hi Smurf,
I often look for your posts!
I'd like to echo the appreciation from other posters in regard to your knowledge of the topic and your very readable style.
(apologies about my posts, I was called away before I could polish them!)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?