Whiskers
It's a small world
- Joined
- 21 August 2007
- Posts
- 3,266
- Reactions
- 1
My preference is for stable but regardless of global warming I don't know if that is realistic.
If you don't know if that is realistic, you make my point, that you don't comprehend even the basics of climate.
One thing is certain in nature, nothing is stable, least of all climate. Everything evolves in cycles.
You sir, are an unrealised and unrecognised genius. The quantum point..
The nano-thin facade of reasonableness turns to sarcasm, the lowest form of wit... and a poor form of argument.
Dude, we have gone through all this before; the continuous flight to extreme by refusing to acknowledge valid dissent is getting boring and increasingly untenable....
.... which accounts for the increasing volume and pitch of shrill.
Gosh, I'm flattered and thank you for the often attributed Oscar Wilde quoteHow did that one finish?
Wow, a breakthrough, I wonder if that is why I defer to climate scientists!
I am very comfortable in saying that I don't know because I don't pretend to know. What would concern me more would be if I couldn't sustain my assertions after the most basic of questions about them.
Doesn't that concern you?
Some Dude, you seem to be quite articulate, intelligent, knowledgeable and reasonably civil in your conversation... that's good.
But, some of your behavioral concepts include, Catastrophizing, Dependency, Invalidation.
Are you diagnosed with some type of personality disorder or do you just enjoy baiting, selective moments of competence and circular conversations with limited moments of clarity to try to belittle those you strongly dissagree with?
If you want me to continue to engage in conversation with you, behave like the responsible, intelligent and logical person I know you can be... otherwise you go on my ignore list.
Not how you think it finishes.... tsk tsk faulty research yet again.
In fact the phrase "as is" pre-dates Wilde and any of the other illegitimate revisions.
Yes I have but would you elaborate by citing the specific examples so that we could discuss whether we can agree on them? Context also please i.e. make sure you include the preceding comment in the conversational examples.Are you diagnosed with some type of personality disorder or do you just enjoy baiting, selective moments of competence and circular conversations with limited moments of clarity to try to belittle those you strongly dissagree with?
So that I can better understand where you are coming from, can you tell me what personality disorder you have been diagnosed with?
So that I can better understand where you are coming from, can you tell me what personality disorder you have been diagnosed with?
Is it a form of Autism like Asperger Syndrome, Attention Deficit Disorder or an Obsessive compulsive personality disorder (OCPD)?
No but you can discuss with me privately why you think it is relevant.
Are you able to elaborate by showing examples, citations, research, evidence, etc for any of the questions posed about your assertions or labels in the previous posts? If so, will you?
It is relevant for the reasons I made at post 4446 and wayneL made at 4443.
I recognise you have a genuine dissability which makes it difficult for you to relate in certain ways. I respect you for acknowledging that and hope you keep working to improve your diagnosis.
Would you elaborate by citing the specific examples so that we could discuss whether we can agree on these attributes?
Way off topic
Just answer the questions with assertions based on facts showing that climate change is not a problem.
We need to smarten up;.................
The nano-thin facade of reasonableness turns to sarcasm, the lowest form of wit... and a poor form of argument.
Dude, we have gone through all this before; the continuous flight to extreme by refusing to acknowledge valid dissent is getting boring and increasingly untenable....
.... which accounts for the increasing volume and pitch of shrill.
Not how you think it finishes.... tsk tsk faulty research yet again.
In fact the phrase "as is" pre-dates Wilde and any of the other illegitimate revisions.
When the hysterical and hypocritical climate change activists and government that not only allowed it, but endorsed it with open arms, do something pretty fast to stop all this extra methane and other undeclared chemicals leaking into the air we breathe and water we consume, then I'll start taking you seriously about climate change.
While I would agree with many of the bony legged Greens posting on Weather, that it has been an horrid Summer, it would appear in Townsville that we are returning to a normal clime.
The bush turkey chicks are growing, the grass is growing, a gentle rain has fallen for the last three days, much as one expects for early April.
Anzac Day Dawn may be cold, as it often is.
27C high today.
21C expected low tonight.
gg
So you are unable to elaborate by showing examples, citations, research, evidence, etc for any of the questions posed about your assertions or labels in the previous posts? Including your post #4446?
If all you are able to do is post assertions and avoid substantiating them, I think my "issues" will likely be the least of your problems.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?