.....This government and AGW supporters are taking us as fools.
They will be surprised at what good memories voters have when the next election eventually rolls around....
That's interesting OWG. Could you consider posting your Notices here so we can all benefit?Sails, speaking of fools, if you recall, we briefly discussed a specific method to NOTICE some of those fools that push the corrupt carbon tax - since I will refuse to pay any carbon tax - I will therefore need some rationale to backup my claims.
Several of my Notices are with key government officials as we speak with one more to go to my local member. Happy to share if you like, PM me if needed.
:sleeping:
We've been through this already 874,987,9876,642,094,252,857,474,126,85u times already.
Lord Monckton is in NZ at the moment and spent 2 hours on Newtalk ZB putting forth the sceptics case and interestingly, a history of AGW alarmism and retroactive editing of the 'science'; freely answering questions from callers, many of whom parroted the alarmist's line.
He made mincemeat of them.
His points:
There is no question that extra co2 = warming, sans other vectors. The question(s) are:
How much warming does it cause?
How much warming since the little ice age has it caused? Has it increased the already naturally warming trend?
What are the extraneous feedbacks... are they positive or negative in toto?
It additional co2 a negative for the planet, or a positive?
Should we try to negate any such effects, if any (whatever they happen to be, at this point indeterminate), or should we mitigate?
Are there other agendas being served by AGW alarmism?
++++++++
Warmists like to attack Monckton with ad hominem slur, but as he challenged today on the radio, please point out where he is wrong and allow right of reply.
That's interesting OWG. Could you consider posting your Notices here so we can all benefit?
I'm at the Australian in Palmer St, GG. Come down for a beer.It is 22C in Townsville at present, a glorious day, some high cloud.
Would anyone be concerned if I burnt some gas at home? Or oil? Or even coal?Well this guy is thinking outside the square anyway. His instincts were correct in working towards a low carbon future, but this wasn't the appropriate methodology. Follow the police directives please sir.
Climate scientist Georgina Griffiths of the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research said yesterday was the coldest day ever recorded in Auckland.
The temperature got up to only 8.2C - compared with the previous lowest high of 8.7C, on July 4, 1996.
The last time snow settled on the ground in the city was 1939. It fell to ground level at the airport in 1976.
I've got a new theory.
Christchurch has done something to annoy the gods.
"The cold snap also wreaked havoc further south including the quake-devastated eastern suburbs of Christchurch. Power was cut to hundreds of homes, mail postponed, schools were shut for the day and heavy snow made it too dangerous to drive on."
No wonder why climate warming alarmists quickly changed their mission name to:
CLIMATE CHANGE
From the "Weather Isn't Climate" file:
Thank you for the link to the snow in Christchurch Wayne. I've never, ever seen snow like that in Christchurch before. I remember the very occasional snowfall, but it was in calm conditions when the snow wafted prettily down and barely settled, in contrast to what seems like a wild storm on this occasion.I've got a new theory.
Christchurch has done something to annoy the gods.
"The cold snap also wreaked havoc further south including the quake-devastated eastern suburbs of Christchurch. Power was cut to hundreds of homes, mail postponed, schools were shut for the day and heavy snow made it too dangerous to drive on."
Some of the most eyeopening points
1) Seeing in physical terms the amount of carbon used by the average American family each year.
http://player.sbs.com.au/programs#/.../latestepisodes/playlist/Power-Surge-Full-Ep/
Basilio, what do you mean by "the amount of carbon used" ?
(My bolds)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?