Logique
Investor
- Joined
- 18 April 2007
- Posts
- 4,290
- Reactions
- 768
Richard Glover in the balanced Fairfax press (SMH) says 'bone-headed' deniers should be forcibly tattooed. Hint: don't expect too much scientific analysis in this article.
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/socie...ers-of-boneheaded-beliefs-20110602-1fijg.html
The dangers of bone-headed beliefs June 6, 2011 by Richard Glover
"...Surely it's time for climate-change deniers to have their opinions forcibly tattooed on their bodies....On second thoughts, maybe the tattooing along the arm is a bit Nazi-creepy..."
A bit Nazi-creepy Richard? What will be next - saying 'meouw' to the beastly 'deniers'?
Richard Glover in the balanced Fairfax press (SMH) says 'bone-headed' deniers should be forcibly tattooed.
"...Surely it's time for climate-change deniers to have their opinions forcibly tattooed on their bodies....On second thoughts, maybe the tattooing along the arm is a bit Nazi-creepy..."
What an infantile piece of writing. Rudeness, arrogance and personal attacks are always the last refuge of the ignorant.
I find this statement rude.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...frosty-reception/story-fn59niix-1226069752818PARLIAMENTARIANS from Julia Gillard down appear ready to give the cold shoulder to Czech President Vaclav Klaus, an outspoken climate change sceptic, when he visits Australia next month.
WikipediaKlaus is a vocal critic of the notion that any global warming is anthropogenic: "Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so." and if it is, that globally coordinated government action is necessary. He has also criticized the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as a group of politicized scientists with one-sided opinions and one-sided assignments. He has said that other top-level politicians do not expose their doubts about global warming because "a whip of political correctness strangles their voices."
In addition he says, "Environmentalism should belong in the social sciences" along with other "isms" such as communism, feminism, and liberalism. Klaus said that "environmentalism is a religion" and, in an answer to the questions of the U.S. Congressmen, a "modern counterpart of communism" that seeks to change peoples' habits and economic systems.
Australian Summary: An intense low is generating very strong, cold winds, showers, small hail and low level snow in TAS, VIC and southern NSW. A front is bringing the odd sleety shower to the NSW central ranges. A trough is generating patchy rain over the northern and western interior.
Richard Glover in the balanced Fairfax press (SMH) says 'bone-headed' deniers should be forcibly tattooed. Hint: don't expect too much scientific analysis in this article.
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/socie...ers-of-boneheaded-beliefs-20110602-1fijg.html
The dangers of bone-headed beliefs June 6, 2011 by Richard Glover
"...Surely it's time for climate-change deniers to have their opinions forcibly tattooed on their bodies....On second thoughts, maybe the tattooing along the arm is a bit Nazi-creepy..."
A bit Nazi-creepy Richard? What will be next - saying 'meouw' to the beastly 'deniers'?
It seems the science isn't settled in the view of (independent of govt) climate expert PhD (Cambridge) Dr Gray. He joins a growing stampede of experienced and respected academics.The hoax continues to unfold....insight into the IPCC corrupt processes, Government policy makers influencing themselves to ensure climate taxes are forced upon the world....
Alan Jones speaks to Dr Vincent Gray about climate change
Are any of the Alarmists here still willing to claim that there's no corruption in the climate establishment? Or has the green ideology brainwashed them to disbelieve the obvious deceit to drive taxation to benefit the elite with zero impact to climate?
The hoax continues to unfold....insight into the IPCC corrupt processes, Government policy makers influencing themselves to ensure climate taxes are forced upon the world....
Alan Jones speaks to Dr Vincent Gray about climate change
Are any of the Alarmists here still willing to claim that there's no corruption in the climate establishment? Or has the green ideology brainwashed them to disbelieve the obvious deceit to drive taxation to benefit the elite with zero impact to climate?
It seems the science isn't settled in the view of (independent of govt) climate expert PhD (Cambridge) Dr Gray. He joins a growing stampede of experienced and respected academics.
He has a good understanding of the fact that the IPCC is dominated by governments. Follow the govt line or be sacked. Follow the govt line or you're not published in the scientific journals. That's how it goes.
The alarmists are panicking. They are making ever more ludicrous statements and shooting more torpedos into their sinking ship (as Bob Carter would say.)
Knobby, the hypothesis that "human CO2 emissions are causing dangerous gobal warming" has not been proven to be correct. Those who believe it to be so have the onus of proof on them. It is not the other way round. The scientific method requires that a hypothesis be tested until observational data proves it to be either true or false.
So far the observational data does not match the theory. The IPCC cannot produce evidence which proves empirically that the hypothesis is true. All it has to do is produce this evidence and the debate will be silenced.
Actually Ruby and others there is quite clear evidence that "human CO2 emissions are causing dangerous global warming" not withstanding bullies like Alan Jones comments.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Empirical-evidence-that-humans-are-causing-global-warming.html
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?