This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Religion IS crazy!

This cult should be banned in Australia. However, just just set-up shop in Chatswood, Sydney ($35m)...




Also, BBC Doco on Scientology. Wow. What a bunch of idiots. Their God is called Zenu....LOLOLOLOLOL.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Feng Shui is also pretty crazy.

Try designing a Feng Shui approved house... you'll go crazy if you're not rich enough, and in the end, probably go broke if you're somewhat rich enough... and will end up with the weirdest, most impractical house any sane person could own.

I saw this massive house that's quite alright except for the paintjob. On the outside they got red, green and purple (all on the one side, each facing certain direction - to be in harmony with the owners' colours I think) and the rest of the house is some "normal" colour; Inside there's yellow, pink, white... and that's just in one room.

But it makes believer feels safe and prosperous, so I guess that's not so crazy.
 
Scientology in Germany


 
Check out this idiot!

Masturbating men ‘will find their hands pregnant in the afterlife,’ says Muslim televangelist​




 
Religion is no different to any other group with a common need, a belief is formed it requires heads to espouse the belief, then corruption, greed and self ordained oracles grow.

If there is one group, who have taken from the poor, and given to god knows who.

Religion has to take the cake,
 

I have not read through the whole thread yet, just want to comment on the original post.

Religion is all in our heads, human beings are what that's messed up. Religion does not do good or bad, people do good or bad under the influence of other people.

Just my opinion. For lack of a better word, I am an atheist, but not because I don't believe there is a God, but because the evidence thus far isn't convincing.
 
Religion is all in our heads, human beings are what that's messed up. Religion does not do good or bad, people do good or bad under the influence of other people.

.

People that have been indoctrinated to believe that a certain religious text is the word of god, can be lead by this belief to carry out very bad actions based on that text. In this situation the cause of the bad thing is the original religious text.



Just my opinion. For lack of a better word, I am an atheist, but not because I don't believe there is a God, but because the evidence thus far isn't convincing

An atheist is a person who doesn't currently believe in any gods. So if you don't believe in a god, then atheist is the best term to describe your position.

Being an Atheist doesn't mean you are claiming to Know 100% that no gods exist, It just means you don't believe in any.

the most common position among atheists is the position of being a "Agnostic Atheist", which I think you might be.

An Agnostic Atheist is one that doesn't currently believe in any gods, But doesn't claim to know that no god exists.
 
I just have so many questions after reading:

 

I'm just wondering at the need to package people's behaviours into neatly packaged word based sect.

I can just see the conversation down the pub: "Do you believe in God?"......"Not necessarily I am actually an 'agnostic atheist' " ............ " Oh right, I think I just saw someone I have to catch up with over there in the far side of the room!"
 

I was clarifying the definition of a word.

First he said he was an atheist, but then he said "but not because I don't believe there is a God", I was pointing out, that not believing in a god is the only thing that makes you an atheist.

If some one says do you believe in a god and you answer "No", then you're an atheist, simple as that, there is no other word that better describes your position.

So at your hypothetical pub, If some said to me "Do you believe in a god" I would say "No, I am an atheist", That's the most clear answer to their question.

The term Agnostic would only be added to clarify my position if they wanted to extend the conversation by saying something like "So can you prove no god exists", I would say "No, I don't claim to Know that no gods exists, I am an agnostic atheist, which means I am happy to say I don't know if any gods exist, but I currently don't believe any do, and I will change my mind if presented with evidence for a god"

So by describing myself as an agnostic atheist, it makes my point clear that I don't believe any of the religious non sense, while also making it clear that I am not making a positive claim that no god exists and the burden of proof is on the party that believes to prove their claim, it's not up to me to debunk all the 1000's of gods.

People often think agnostic and atheist are exclusive terms, they are not, Agnostic describes your position on what you claim to know, Atheist describes your position on what you believe.
 
I guess people are questioning religion. Show me evidence of God. Just because my mum/dad/priest said it, it must be true.


http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0121454
 
Should any on ASF wish to make a motza out of Religion and Gullibility, I will shortly be launching the "Church of Gumnut"

This will be a tax advantaged vehicle for believers in transcendence, god and spirituality

It will con vulnerable people with medium to high disposable income.

Please PM me, if you wish to become

Cardinal $500,000
Bishop $100,000
Pastor $ 50,000
Muppet $10,000

Praise be.

gg
 

If someone wants to have that kind of discussion with me in a Pub, I'm quite happy for them to find "someone over there" and leave me to enjoy my beer - and maybe a pub conversation about Footy or the global economy. And if he can't find "someone over there", I'm quite likely to point him in the direction where "I think someone tries to catch your attention over there" - which could be less hurtful to his feelings than telling him straight where to take his superstition.
 
Wow....


Jewish sect's ban on women drivers is 'completely unacceptable in modern Britain', says Nicky Morgan​



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/nicky-morgan-claims-ultraorthodox-jewish-communitys-decision-to-ban-female-drivers-is-completely-unacceptable-10286577.html
 
the whole idea of prosperity religon - faith in God will make you rich - has always disgusted me.

But I think Crflo Dollar Ministries have brought the televangelist crowd to a new time low

https://youtu.be/UIobdRNLNek

After much public outcry, the campaign was eventually halted, though that didn’t stop the church from making all kinds of excuses. They explained that the church needed the Gulfstream G650 so it could carry a dozen people plus 100,000 pounds of food. Clearly they didn’t do any research on the plane, because the Gulfstream G650 has virtually no cargo capacity.

Now it's the devil doesn't want Crflo Dollar to get that swanky new G650. The bolded sentences at the end of the statement sum it up nicely.

I never thought I'd asky myself the question, but what would Jesus do in this situation. Would he being flying aroud the world in one of the most luxurious private jets, or would he be travelling around in 10 abreast coach on the 777 rubbing shoulders with the unwashed masses?

$65M USD buys a whole lot of commercial flights, along with aid for those they're supposedly helping.

https://youtu.be/HcT7cKr3hCw

In a bit of a PR blitz CDM released the below statement

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...