- Joined
- 20 December 2021
- Posts
- 218
- Reactions
- 500
logic says the RBA will 'round ' the interest rates sooner rather than later , the canary MIGHT be house prices/sales , if the housing market cools a little , the RBA MIGHT lift off the pedal a little next month to only raise TO 1%The RBA surprised markets with their decision yet again, seems like not many were expecting the cash rate to be lifted 0.5%.
Perhaps 50bps rate hikes are becoming the new norm with major central banks, in which case both AUD and the ASX200 may potentially be in for some repricing building up to the July meeting.
I’m going with 0.25%. The RBA broke governor broke his promise of no rate rise until 2024, so he doesn’t want to go too hard.
My business partner reckons that if the RBA board has any guts they’ll get all the pain out of the way early and hit us with 0.5%. Short term pain for long term gain.
Christmas in July lol.All I want for Christmas is .... for today's 0.5% rate hike to immediately flow through to bank term deposits
KH
probably not , some would argue the RBA 'gifted' the ALP a win by raising during an election campaign , and is now giving a belated appearance of action , if getting things habitually wrong was a sin , half the civil servants would be gone ( in DOZENS of departments , not just the RBA and Treasury )Well, will Albo fire Lowe now?
He got the predictions systemically wrong since he took over.
Between the the Financial Wizards at the RBA and the Financial Wizards at treasurey, we F@#@#^ed.
Their forecasts are less than worthless.
Mick
Well if Lowe wanted to "gift" the ALP a win, he would have done a couple of rates increases well before he did.probably not , some would argue the RBA 'gifted' the ALP a win by raising during an election campaign , and is now giving a belated appearance of action , if getting things habitually wrong was a sin , half the civil servants would be gone ( in DOZENS of departments , not just the RBA and Treasury )
and sacking all those career public servants would be fatal for the ALP
the QUESTION is do this public servants know the truth , but lie to fit the government agenda , or are they all incapable of seeing the truth in their analysis ( remembering most belong to the Keynesian school of economics and some are fans of MMT aka they have been educated to think this way )
but worthless , yes , much of the time, but employing them boosts union membership and make the unemployment figures look better
maybe , but the Sco-Mo narrative was we were all fineWell if Lowe wanted to "gift" the ALP a win, he would have done a couple of rates increases well before he did.
We could have had rates with a 2 in front of them by the time the election was called if he had the cajones.
The ALP may have got 85 seats and control of the senate.
Mick
100%…whole generation of home owners out there who have never experienced high interest rates and have only experienced rate reductions. Interesting times ahead for sure.The 50 BPS interest rate rise was the first time in 20 years that the RBA has done a 50 BPS rise (they have done a few 50BPS cuts, but that is another matter).
Its also almost 20 years there was any kind of rate rise.
So there must be a lot of home buyers out there who have never had the sticker shock of a rate rise.
Will be interesting to see what happens with spending.
Mick
Most people don’t understand the reality here.
When RBA raises the interest rate on money banks borrow it is only part of the price of their capital.
Most is zero cost as in savings deposits.
But the big deception is that banks lend out multiples of their capital (deposits and borrowing) according to capital adequacy risk settings. Right now for every $15 capital they can lend out $100.
So 7 times more than what they borrow. So if the cost of borrowing goes up 0.5% for a fraction of the borrowing the cost for a $100 they lend out only goes up less than one seventh of that increase.
To put up loan rates by the full RBA rates is passing on the cost by more than seven fold. Probably a factor of 20 as RBA funding isn’t much of their borrowing and a lot of their borrowing is fixed rate or zero.
So their profits margins go up a lot.
The down side is mortgage defaults but they have very secure loans by world standards force mortgage insurance on borrowers to reduce their risk etc and can even go after borrowers for money if the value of their loan security drops below the loan value.
Very easy for banks in Australia compared to USA banks.
The idea is to make people stop spending (reduce demand) to slowdown inflation.
But banks are reaping bigger profits by increasing the profits per dollar lent by raising rates b ymore than their real cost per dollar lent increased. To learn more look up fractional loan lending.
I read the following from a commentator in the dreaded murdoch press.
Back in the olden days, when banks sourced much of their capital from overseas markets, the banks were at the mercy of off shore investors.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?