- Joined
- 28 March 2006
- Posts
- 3,566
- Reactions
- 1,309
I have quickly grasped an example to chart below, there are better and many similiar examples but this is a recent one.
There are probably better examples being covered over the last few weeks on the XAO and PEN threads.Boggo great to see some live charts.
(Must say though, a book published x number of years ago is hardly live application. I could do that with any system in retrospect)
On ELM Chart 2, it looks interesting but your W3 and 4 look pretty shaky to my untrained eye.
Won't we only know that they are 3 and 4 after its broken 3? And even then, the 4 is not lower than the Feb 25 low. Does that still fit the EW rules?
Kennas.
Your doing a good job controlling your skepticism.
Boggo has come close in his labelling.(Hope you dont mind Boggo)
A GET's is a little closer I think.
I have always thought that Kennas was a closet EW purveyor anyway
Eh?...those who cant work with fluid motion.
Eh?
Last time I looked, price action is the same whether or not an EW count is applied, ergo we all work with "fluid motion" in one way or another (with varying degrees of success).
ANY method is about your oft quoted and oft bolded APPLICATION. I'll bet even Gann can be applied successfully.... even indicators.
Speaking of Gann, your post here was rather Gannesque in its "you don't undersatnd", when all Kennas was asking was a demonstration of application in real time rather than a hundred calls, one of which will look prophetic in hindsight.
Hi tech,
I have a couple of questions in regards to the way that EW is applied. Whilst I can fully appreciate that counts evolve over time, the actual application of this side of things has me a little lost.
A couple of examples to illustrate my issues with it:
From July 2009:
On the 10th July:
This opinion you've expressed above ties in with the chart you posted in the XAO analysis thread(post 6565), which was labelling that current correction as the start of a wave 5 down to new lows in the context of the 07-08 bearmarket.
And then at the end of that month you highlighted that the 14th of July was the end of an ABC correction:
So based on what you've said in those posts, the count has obviously changed in those 2 trading days, but what I can't wrap my head around completely is where a count can change so drastically, from a new leg down in a once in a generation bear market to a small ABC correction in an ongoing rally.
What are the triggers that can change a count so drastically, and how would it be applied in real time?
Yet to see one mainstream EW practitioner get a decent handle on market , all this predictive rubbish has scam written allover it.
A lot of those EW practioners are using it only to forcast rather than intergrate it into a practical trading system.
Example: If your software shows a wave 4 retracement then you should trade when it shows the trend has turned back up. Don't just buy the first time the program flashes "WAVE 4". IMO EW works best when you have a mechanical entry after the price moves up from the specified retracement level.
Bump...
Sorry Prof
I forgot about this question
Im out to dinner tonight but should get sometime to refresh my analysis and explain.
no worries tech
If that is the case, then why bother with EW at all? Just wait for a higher low to form and then start buying the minor breakouts of the dips
I find it useful to use the EW structure to see the markets position. If it was in the process of a wave 4 retracement, i'd be waiting for a signal to go long and would not take short trades. That way i'm am trading with the main trend. One the other hand if the EW was indicating another move down i wouldn't be looking to buy on the dips.
I find the EW ties in well with Gann's 'sections of the market'. Gann said that bull markets generally have 3 to 4 up sections. I can easily see the sections on my software using EW tool.
If it was in the process of a wave 4 retracement, i'd be waiting for a signal to go long and would not take short trades.
I can easily see the sections on my software using EW tool.
My point was that by the time the market gets to the point where it would be labelled a wave 4, it's blindingly obvious that the market is in an uptrend and that in order for you to continue trading with the trend the next one you take should be long.
EW used in this context is a fairly pointless exercise.
So would you have gone long on IGO based on that theory just because its in an uptrend ?
Not disagreeing with you, just wondering how you determine that the correction is complete and a new uptrend has resumed and where you might enter.
Quite often you see the W.4 and then everyone jumping in on the breakout with the resumption of the (soon to correct itself) trend.
Look at IGO on the XAO Banter thread, there was 49c in W.5 if you nailed it perfectly without slippage or fees.
I WILL actually be able to deliver that sometime tonight.
It should help many--not only with Elliott but with ALL analysis.
IGO used as an example in previous post above.
I'm gathering you are talking about a stock code hereThe one above is PRR?
If you are talking about an individual company I wouldn't have a clue, I mainly trade indices.
Feel free to point out an index and I'll throw an opinion out there for it.
EDIT: sorry Boggo, I just saw the edit you made on the post. Will go and have a look
So would you have gone long on IGO based on that theory just because its in an uptrend ?
Not disagreeing with you, just wondering how you determine that the correction is complete and a new uptrend has resumed and where you might enter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?