- Joined
- 19 February 2016
- Posts
- 953
- Reactions
- 1,544
Worked perfectly to Trumps advantage by making him appear well-mannered.
Worked perfectly to Trumps advantage by making him appear well-mannered.Trump couldn't cut in because they turned the microphone off during the other candidates speaking term (Democrat rule along with no audience).
I never thought of that. They must be tearing their hair out.Worked perfectly to Trumps advantage by making him appear well-mannered.
The betting market doesn't think so, but I do think from the democratic perspective she would probably be a better bet than Newsome, on the face of it.I wonder if Michelle Obama will have a crack.
I'm thinking dems might throw another black candidate in.
Current Dem nominee market on BetfairI wonder if Michelle Obama will have a crack.
I'm thinking dems might throw another black candidate in.
Im just not convinced on Newsom. Dems would go with a DEI hire to clinch it.The betting market doesn't think so, but I do think from the democratic perspective she would probably be a better bet than Newsome, on the face of it.
Newsome is the better debater however and still my back for the nominee... Might even have a bet on that roughly 10/1 odds on Betfair.
Also just want to reiterate that I got $4.20 on Trump... Into $1.70 last time I looked.
I think there is one or two tasty lays in the field to0.
I was think she would love a crack. She would fight dirty as wellAkshually, I might go in large on a lay on Hillary Clinton.
I would not be surprised hence why I would certainly not go the lay on Big Mike.Im just not convinced on Newsom. Dems would go with a DEI hire to clinch it.
I guess the real problem is, a lot of Biden supporters thought the clips of him fumbling over the last couple of years, were fake.
That surprise me because she is so disliked. Just layed on an amount that would seriously hurt if she got the nomination.Hillary might be thrown in as a redemption arc/girl boss. Yanks love that sht.
Safe bet would be MObama imo.
But then again, dems could always just cheat.
I suspect that's the other half of why they have someone so preposterous front and centre. If they know they can cheat to a win, like they knew in the 4 years leading to 2020 with the mail in ballots, biased media and the smearing, then why does it matter who their front piece is? The first half of why they have him there is that he is now feeble minded and fully manipulable from behind the scenes. He has served as a pushover dupe for Obama imoBut then again, dems could always just cheat.
That is the only reasonable explanation.They would not let Biden debate unless they wanted him gone. This whole thing was a setup.
That makes sense, but why do it in such a publicly humiliating way, they could have just tapped him on the shoulder and said "mate you need to announce your retirement, for health and family reasons".They would not let Biden debate unless they wanted him gone. This whole thing was a setup.
You are a weird dude, why would anybody want to lay Hillary Clinton?Akshually, I might go in large on a lay on Hillary Clinton.
HahaYou are a weird dude, why would anybody want to lay Hillary Clinton?
Mick
Because democrats believed the narrative that "Joe is mentally sharp". There were members on here that believed it. That's the problem with "group think". I think some were saying Trump wasn't mentally all there, I'd attribute that more to massive stress rather than any cognitive issues.That makes sense, but why do it in such a publicly humiliating way, they could have just tapped him on the shoulder and said "mate you need to announce your retirement, for health and family reasons".
That's usually how it goes.
To let him go on T.V like that, a lot of voters will say, why wont they just roll out another Joe to replace that one.
They've lost a lot of credibility IMO.
Imagine what all the heads of State of different Countries must have thought, when meeting him, they probably went WTF is going on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?