This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Islam: Is it inherently Evil?

I love getting these emails

 
When I heard Trump on the news talk about ISIS drowning people in cages, I stupidly googled it.

It's the most horrifying and sad thing I've ever seen. I feel really upset about it. What the hell is the world coming to?

The use of torture has no place anywhere in the world under any circumstances.
 

For a country that pats itself on the back for waging guerilla warfare against the mother country's troops back in the day, I find it amusing they sprout playing by the rules as if they have a pedigree to protect .


 
How did you get on these lists McGraw? Is there like an old white people list or something, haha...

Very old relatives who have discovered the internet and the boundless opportunities to lament the passing of Empire and the good 'ol white Australia days.
 
Very old relatives who have discovered the internet and the boundless opportunities to lament the passing of Empire and the good 'ol white Australia days.

Isn't there an Senior filter or something? haha... wont be so funny when I get there.

oh yea, apologies to other old farts who aren't, ahem...
 


Wow. Trump has all the makings of a Bush Jr. presidency. Though Obama kinda got ahead of the torture and waterboarding and Guantanamo image problem - he just blow them up instead of capturing and torturing them.
 
This is what happens to "moderates"

Muslim newsagent's killer 'travelled 200 miles to knife him'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Easter-m-Christians.html#ixzz44B4vegQl

That's why they don't say boo.

No meaningful deterrent for the scum. It doesn't have to be a clever solution either ...like the three strike rule in the USA that made it a lot more enjoyable for people like me in places like New York, surely someone with the power can do something meaningful, rather than selling the current civilised generation of westerners down to allow generational change to take effect amongst the savages who are stuck in the 6th century saharan hell hole.
 

A high price other people have to pay for your enjoyment there McGill.
 
A high price other people have to pay for your enjoyment there McGill.


Don't do the crime unless you can do the time.

It's not an Arab's fault he is born Arabic, but the least he can do is try to make up for it by rejecting primitive instructions from a time even (possibly) more primitive than the middle east is today. If the religious instruction was from some amoeba two million years ago I reckon there would be following in the the old countries, just because that was a time of enlightenment that we somehow lost because of evolution ...fricken wierd how people with an adult sized brain can still constrain it to that of a embecile.
 
A high price other people have to pay for your enjoyment there McGill.

So in your opinion people should not have to pay a price for common law transgressions?

Effectively, you are saying law abiding citizens should happily tolerate their victimhood at the hands of criminals.

That's just putrid boyo.
 
So in your opinion people should not have to pay a price for common law transgressions?

Effectively, you are saying law abiding citizens should happily tolerate their victimhood at the hands of criminals.

That's just putrid boyo.

I take offence from my good colleague luutzu being called a boy.
 
So in your opinion people should not have to pay a price for common law transgressions?

Effectively, you are saying law abiding citizens should happily tolerate their victimhood at the hands of criminals.

That's just putrid boyo.

I didn't say not pay for crimes. I said high price they've paid.

The three strikes rules and mandatory sentencing locked up a lot of youths, for many years at a time; and in most cases, for minor non-violent crimes like drug dealing or theft/burglary or got caught with certain grams of weed.

You put stupid kids who made mistakes or just minors with not much to do beside joining gangs... you lock them up for a few years no matter what the nature of their crime is - as long as it's considered a crime... well you destroy lives.

First you destroy their lives because criminal tend not to be able to get any job or go any place; then you destroy other people's lives because even criminals need to eat and have shelter and those costs money. Can't find a job, where do they turn? More crimes, worst crimes. Society pays.

Then society pay for prisons to lock them up; for guards to guard them; for private for-profit prison shareholders' demand for growth and margins and returns.

That's why Bill Clinton was so welcomed by the private prison industry in the US. He nationalised the three-strike rules, almost doubled the US prison population over his eight years. And ka-chinks ka chinks for some; life time of poverty and prison round-about for millions of once stupid weed smoking, gansta wannabe kids.

----

But with regard to my comment to Tisme... it wasn't critical of him. I think I know his sense of "humour"; that and the bi-polar condition
 

Crims make a choice. Just like raising kids you give them the benefit of the doubt first time, apply some gravitas punishment the second time and third time WWIII erupts.

It's all well and good proposing we all take a equal share hit from the deliberate criminal behaviour of the few, but why should we stall our civilised pleasures because of the few ... that is what middle eastern, african and oriental peoples do and they are tragic examples of go nowhere cultures with the constant sword of Damocles hanging over their heads.

How many people need to be mugged, raped, permanently damaged and scarred before we are supposed to say that the tribe can no longer function and the poison must be removed? Of course you don't ask a social worker, that would require risking loss of job as the need dried up.
 
Exactly Tisyou. Could not agree more.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...