This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Islam: Is it inherently Evil?


I seem to be the only respondent who has taken basilio's comments as general, rather than specifically relating to criticism of Islam. My post was as a result of that assumption and did not imply any criticism of anyone finding fault with behaviour of Islamists. Probably I should have considered more the thread title and basilio should have been more clear about whether he was focusing on criticism of Islam or general behaviour on the internet.
 
Just for interest I googled "Is Islam inherantly evil".

What a surprise...Pages and pages of discussions on just that topic. Seems that every (non-muslim...) and his dog wants to start a discussion with this premise.

I don't want to try and discuss each comment in detail. As I said I believe quite strongly that the portrayal of Islam as inherently evil by quotation of the Quran is just a series of simplistic or willfully ignorant actions.

It is dead simple to trash a religion by picking words and phrases out of context both linguistically and historically. For anyone who cares to read just what the Quran says and what was meant I'll post the reference.

I agree there are some ugly Islamic states which treat women particularly badly. Saudi Arabia springs to mind. There are others as well. In these cases it is a fundamentalist approach to Islam that is the issue. Fundamentalist Jews, Christians whatever will have similar rigid belief systems that they want to impose on the rest of the community. And it will cause grief.

I found a particularly good site that explains what Islam is about. Perhaps it's worth checking out if people are going to discuss this topic with any respect ?

http://spiritualperception.org/top-five-misquotations-of-the-quran/



http://spiritualperception.org/islam-and-non-muslims/
 
From "The Australian" today:
Why is it that the Muslim community is demanding taxpayer funded government programs to prevent the bad behaviour of their young people?

How is the government supposed to prevent these people from accepting the urgings to them from mosques or the internet which supposedly prompt them to want to fight for ISIS et al?

Isn't it reasonable to expect Muslim leaders, those so called moderate people, to take some responsibility for managing their own community?
 

Perhaps you should have another look at boggo's illustration.



It is an undeniable truth. Perhaps,with you obsession, you would feel more comfortable if you were a part of the Muslim minority here. We have no laws against apostasy.
 

Attachments

  • attachment.jpg
    3 KB · Views: 24

A read of the article in the link below puts the European problem in perspective.

Extract ".... in Denmark Muslims constitute only 5% of the population, yet consume 40% of the welfare budget."

http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/cost-of-muslim-immigration.html
 
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (his adopted religious identity) makes some very valid points in this article. He is of course correct when he points out that money, bragging-rights in a power struggle and deceived, programmed drones are all part of the tapestry of what is going on in radical Islam. However, to assert that terrorist acts committed by "self-proclaimed" radical Muslims should be divorced from any genuine religious motivation is both disingenuous and a naive delusion.

Kareem's views on Islam must be viewed through a prism of discernment, he is an extremely biased commentator on the subject. The KKK analogy is a particularly poor argument, the hate and prejudice enshrined by this racist organization and the acts they carry out, are done in the name of white supremacy not Jesus.

Kareem's desperate plea that acts of Islamist terrorism be dismissed as a misunderstanding of true Islam by criminals should be discarded as nonsensical. To suggest that a violent Muslim fundamentalist does not properly understand Islam (and Islam is not the problem) when he flies a plane into a building shouting Allahu Akbar begs the question of who is more deceived, the person committing the act or the person who denies Islam is the problem and prime motivation.

It takes the basic tenets of a religion like Islam to create the violent drones he rails against. When acts of jihad are a ticket to an eternity in paradise, life on earth is only a proving ground for demonstrating one's worthiness to get the ticket. The sooner one can get to paradise the better, it's not a death cult but rather an eternal life in paradise cult. Islam certainly inspires evil and is a grand deception that, like its cousin Christianity, is a combination of myth, legend and fiction masquerading as absolute truth.
 

Apparently there are not only virgins in paradise, but young boys too, to cater for males with different tastes..



http://www.albatrus.org/english/religions/islam/72virgins_and_boys.htm
 
FxTrader

Agree with your over all sentiment FX however isnt the KKK using Christianity for cover or twisting words out of the Christian faith to suit their view of the world in the same or similar manner the radical Jihad mob are.

I do understand that Islam has in the main only ever been spread by the sword.

The KKK analogy is a particularly poor argument, the hate and prejudice enshrined by this racist organization and the acts they carry out, are done in the name of white supremacy not Jesus.


I am sure you have a better understanding of the Islamic verses than I, couldn't anyone cherry pick how you apply similar to the above example of the KKK?

The Bali bombers had no sympathy from the general population in Indonesia when they were shot only the radicals thought it was an act of faith.

Most of the lunatics committing murder against western targets have been complete losers by any measure ex druggies, drug dealers, pips, lost souls with no purpose and a bent for breaking rules hardly intellectuals of a religious faith rather drones as you put it under the influence of men wanting to exercise power.


The immediate issue for the west is that large populations of Muslims live among us, as expressed by a security expert on ABC the other day the west must mobilise the moderates against the radicals failure to do so will just produce more radicals.


 
Open-minded IFocus asks the question;

however isnt the KKK using Christianity for cover or twisting words out of the Christian faith to suit their view of the world in the same or similar manner the radical Jihad mob are.

So what? The estimated Klan membership of 3000 to 5000 in America is miniscule. There are 1.5 billion Muslims.The Klan's potential for evil is negligable, Islam's potential for evil is massive and is being demonstrated every day.
 

How do you say stuff like that and not see how wrong that is? Both intellectually and just... common sensibly?

So the KKK members, despite also being White and Christian, are on the whole only dangerous because they're members of the KKK. So when it comes to the KKK, they're nasty because of their membership card - one that reads "KKK" - any White or any Christian that's not a KKK member, they're innocent.

But with the terrorists, being Arab and Muslim (predominantly) as well as member of one Jihadist group or another... why these terrorists are the same as all the rest of them Muslims - all 1.5 billions of them.

Wow!


Well at least you see all men (of the same race and religion) are brothers - except when they're White, Christian and also nasty - in which case they're just nasty and their claim to the same faith as yours are false, their same skin colour... that's just because they don't go out too often.
 
FxTrader
Isn’t the KKK using Christianity for cover or twisting words out of the Christian faith to suit their view of the world in the same or similar manner the radical Jihad mob are.

KKK were racist criminals. Jihadists are religious warriors.
KKK operations were limited to within the USA. Jihadists operate globally.
KKK were not following a mission to conquer the world. Jihadists are pursuing a goal of forcing the entire world to completely submit to Islam and Sharia law.
KKK were officially denounced by virtually every Christian denomination in existence. How many Islamic organisations have officially denounced the Jihadists?

FxTrader
I do understand that Islam has in the main only ever been spread by the sword.
Doesn’t that tell you enough?


There are very few moderates who have the courage to speak out let alone mobilise against the radicals (whatever ‘mobilise against’ actually means ??) Those muslims who stood up after the Paris shootings and declared on CNN that Islam is a religion of peace are either woefully ignorant of their own Islamic doctrine or were being deliberately deceptive. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt and assume they are just woefully ignorant and also very well meaning. Unfortunately though, their naïve statements are impotent.

There are however, some ex-muslim scholars who at very great personal risk have in recent years published their detailed scholarly research to try and educate both the West and other muslims about the real nature of Islam and the truth about the life of its sole creator – Muhammad.

I believe the best way to counter the muslim radicals is for the work of these scholars to be spread far and wide under the protection of Western freedom of speech (for as long as we still have it). I am certain there are muslims who will flee from the control of Islam once they understand how they themselves have been deceived. The ex-muslim Islamic scholars themselves are prime examples and we should be extremely grateful to them. Their published works are potentially our best bulwark.
 

I have often encountered those sites that try to explain away the inherent violence and hatred promoted by the Quran. While there are many Islamophobes that deliberately misquote the Quran, Hadith and other "sacred" texts, there are many serious scholars of Islam that do not misquote and show precisely the violence that Islam advocates. I know there are also parts of the Quran that promote tolerance and peace, but that does not excuse the inherently evil parts. In regards to the latter, when you go to those apologist sites, you will see complete obfuscation and deceit in their attempts to deny the obvious meaning of what is written. You will see them say "kill" doesn't actually mean kill, "Jews" doesn't apply to all Jews or to present day Jews but just a particular group of Jews that they were at war with at a particular time. "War" doesn't mean war, but passive resistance of some sort. It is they that are falling over backwards to linguistically twist what was written so that it appears not to mean what it patently obviously says. When I have time to do it justice, I will give some examples.

Looking at another aspect of the "scared" texts, their explanation of physical phenomena such as the age of the earth, of man, formation of planets and stars etc. Since the Quran is the written word of Allah to all that accept Islam, then true Islamists must accept what is written in those texts as correct. But we know, with an additional 1400 years of scientific knowledge to draw from, that the "sacred" texts are wrong in the explanation they give to the physical world. These same apologist websites also address these incompatibilities in exactly the same way as for the violence aspect, by obfuscation and deceit. Words are twisted to mean something else so that they can fit in with modern day scientific knowledge (though they mostly haven't accepted evolution yet). In fact I recently read several articles on Islamic websites that said a multiverse universe is consistent with the Quran. These were in response to a growing number of scientists backing the possibility of a multiverse rather than a single universe.

Here is an example and look at the nonsense they put up to support that argument.

Multiverse in the Quran?

http://www.islamophilic.com/#!Multiverse-in-the-Quran/c1p08/E06194D6-184B-4365-B9F3-D3F16F6D479C

It should be obvious to anyone with a modicum of intelligence that this is just a bulldust explanation so that they can continue to claim that the Quran is the written word of God and is beyond criticism. Why is it so difficult to not see that their "explanations" for the violence and hatred in the Quran is just the same bulldust so that they can claim Islam to be a religion of peace and distance themselves from the violence that is endemic in the muslim world.

One of the reasons moderate muslims find it impossible to control the extremists in their midsts is that the extremists rely on the words that the Quran and Hadith actually say in support of their actions and the moderate leaders have nothing to counter them other than perhaps drawing on those parts of the Quran that promote peace. But even those parts, when you read them in context, only support peace and tolerance to infidels when they succumb to the will of Allah.
 
Of Course - Islam Has Nothing to Do with Islam

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of Course - Islam Has Nothing to Do with Islam

Of course President Obama believes that terrorism "has nothing to do with Islam" It's hard not to believe that he is a closet Islamist

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of course President Obama believes that terrorism "has nothing to do with Islam" It's hard not to believe that he is a closet Islamist

Maybe Obama and all others like him are just trying to avoid being added to the Islamic terrorist hit lists. Speak out and speak the truth and that's where you end up, like ex-muslim (i.e. apostate) Ayaan Hirsi Ali who says that terrorism has everything to do with Islam.

http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2015/s4160195.htm
 
Speak out and speak the truth and that's where you end up, like ex-muslim (i.e. apostate) Ayaan Hirsi Ali who says that terrorism has everything to do with Islam.
I admire her conviction and courage. It is in strong contrast to Australian Muslim 'moderate leaders' who were reported recently as being too afraid to confront radicalised members of their family or community.

Surely the obvious thing to do would be to report them to the police or other appropriate agency.
 

Wouldn't you agree that the smart thing to do for a "moderate" Muslim is to not draw attention and possible reprisal to yourself by publicly confronting radicals, but privately "dob them in" to police ?
 
Wouldn't you agree that the smart thing to do for a "moderate" Muslim is to not draw attention and possible reprisal to yourself by publicly confronting radicals, but privately "dob them in" to police ?
I have no idea. Depends on their family and community relationships, I suppose. I'd have thought that if your son or daughter was showing signs of untoward activity you'd have a responsibility to make an effort to deal with it intra-family as first resort.

I already suggested there existed the option of contacting police, rather than just doing nothing which is what was implied in the article.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...