- Joined
- 10 June 2007
- Posts
- 4,045
- Reactions
- 1,404
can you see the oxymoronic disposition of this editorial.....obviously, they don't !
ever pondered the difference between the employment of the words "fact" versus "evidence" ?
Maybe we have to accept large part of australia will soon be inhabitable
Not the moon yet, people have survived in saudi Arabia etc.but we need different infrastructure, different road surface etcMaybe...
What would be the implications of that for us ? Where would the people who live in those areas go ? What about the national infrastructure that goes through Australia and these regions ? Roads, power and so on.
Who takes the financial losses of all that property ?
Uncomfortable questions but realistic IMV.
A big difference between capacity, production and actual needsThat was an excellent reference Rederob. I think most posters would be particularly interested in the second URL
Germany’s energy consumption and power mix in charts
Fossil fuels Renewables
A wealth of numbers and statistics describe the energy generation and consumption of nation states. This factsheet provides a range of charts (and data links) about the status of Germany’s energy mix, as well as developments in energy and power production and usage since 1990. [Updates graphs on power generation and energy consumption to include 2018 data.]
https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/germanys-energy-consumption-and-power-mix-charts
We already have the crocs, box jellyfish at the border.
.
Croc wise, down to Mary river/fraserThe Crocs found around Brisbane have been Juveniles which has usually been reported as pets dumped once they've gotten too big. Gold Coast creeks are full of people every weekend, luckily colder Winter weather deters Croc migration here ATM. North of Gympie seems to be the start of occassionial adult Croc sitings.
The Irukandji may have started it's invasion south though.
Only a third...if we diminish indian population by half,all good and gw mitigation become reachable whereas otherwise, the remaining 2/3 are gone....One of the HUGE issues facing a much hotter world is the effect on glaciers. In particular what will be the effect on the Himalayan glaciers which feed the Indian subcontinent.
A five year study has been released which examines the loss of ice from these huge natural water storages.
A third of Himalayan ice cap doomed, finds report
Even radical climate change action won’t save glaciers, endangering 2 billion people
Damian Carrington Environment editor
@dpcarrington
Mon 4 Feb 2019 22.45 AEDT Last modified on Tue 5 Feb 2019 05.15 AEDT
Shares
10k
Melting ice on Khumbu glacier in the Everest-Khumbu region. Himalayan glaciers are a water source for 250 millions people. Photograph: Alex Treadway/ICIMOD
At least a third of the huge ice fields in Asia’s towering mountain chain are doomed to melt due to climate change, according to a landmark report, with serious consequences for almost 2 billion people.
Even if carbon emissions are dramatically and rapidly cut and succeed in limiting global warming to 1.5C, 36% of the glaciers along in the Hindu Kush and Himalaya range will have gone by 2100. If emissions are not cut, the loss soars to two-thirds, the report found.
The glaciers are a critical water store for the 250 million people who live in the Hindu Kush-Himalaya (HKH) region, and 1.65 billion people rely on the great rivers that flow from the peaks into India, Pakistan, China and other nations.
“This is the climate crisis you haven’t heard of,” said Philippus Wester of the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (Icimod), who led the report. “In the best of possible worlds, if we get really ambitious [in tackling climate change], even then we will lose one-third of the glaciers and be in trouble. That for us was the shocking finding.”
https://www.theguardian.com/environ...imalayan-ice-cap-doomed-finds-shocking-report
Only a third...if we diminish indian population by half,all good and gw mitigation become reachable whereas otherwise, the remaining 2/3 are gone....
But no, tax red meat is the answer i am sure.
Gw, tackle the real cause
Diminish..?" Isn't that a bit of a euphemism ? Do we then diminish the Chinese, rest of Asia, Africa, South America ?Only a third...if we diminish indian population by half,all good and gw mitigation become reachable whereas otherwise, the remaining 2/3 are gone..
Do not have to commit genocide but a one child policy done 50 years ago would have sorted it, and this is in no way even started in Pakistan Bangladesh egypt Indonesia nigeria..do i go on?
Genocide probably isn't too politically correct nowadays Frog, but I admire your enthusiasm.
Consumption per person x number of persons = scale of problem.So we can have 1 billion extra persons on earth and it is all good if each one is using only half or a sixth of the horrible American/Australian?
Bloody problem with auto correction changing my postsHow abd to be fair in term of religion.philippine...
It is coming from Basilio's favourite source, not that old and explain why so many liberals do not like democracy..sorry now called populism
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...pollution-initiative-1631-washington-rejected
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.