- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,357
- Reactions
- 7,232
From the paper linked:
Overall I won't claim any scientific expertise on the climate change subject but I can certainly spot the inclusion of irrelevant data and information in their report. As with anything, once a few lies are spotted it casts serious doubt over the rest.
Ditto.. The analysis of the "The Great Global warming Swindle" opened up (at least) 8 separate issues where graphs were doctored, completely false information used to support the hypothesis, scientists words taken totally out of context, and date used that at the time was known to be wrong because of readjustments made to temperatures measured by global satellites.
Why would one ever accept anything else proposed in such a program when you can see such overt deceptions ? They have trashed their credibility. It just doesn't make sense.
By the way CO2 is not the only culprit in global warming. There are other Greenhouse Gases which trap heat.
The atmospheric concentrations of some greenhouse gases are being affected directly by human activities namely carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) (cow farts !!), nitrous oxide (N2O), ozone (O3), and synthetic gases, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).
https://www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au/en/climate-campus/climate-system/greenhouse-gases/
PS Principa Scientific is a climate denier website intended to provide a fig leaf of "Science" to presentations that attempt to deny the cause and reality of current global warming.