- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,638
- Reactions
- 24,526
People just have no comprehension of how much they rely on electricity, as you say if it fails it will be spectacular and people will be awestruck.Put it all together and it's only a matter of time until it all goes wrong. The details are anyone's guess, that's the nature of power systems, but you can't keep gambling and not expect to lose at some point.
I don't know about them reversing climate change, but from watching the video's they may know something about land degradation, which Australia has been doing for years.
Just fly over our farmlands and see the salt pans.
It's just a figure of speech. I'm sure in his early struggle to convince the scientific world he is onto something right or him culling of 40,000 elephants, he would have been called one at some stage.
I've watched many of Allan's videos and he did mention in one of his videos that his 20 minute presentation on Ted talk has created worldwide attention than he could have done on his own over his lifetime.
I'm am definitely sure that Allan is onto something right mimicking nature.
Are you running a chicken farm like Joel Salatin does?
I think you are spot on Ann.Joel Salatin is far, far more than a chicken farmer on his Polyface Farm. He is a power for change in the agricultural and farming populations. You would need to watch some of his two hour videos to fully grasp the reach of this man. He runs bunched herds of cattle as outlined by Allan Savory. He rotates his grazing cattle and follows that with flocks of turkeys and chickens housed in chicken tractors to turn over the grazed soil. His son is developing grazing rabbits free from any hand feeding. He runs pigs which act as a compost turning machine and also has them turn over some of his woodlands. He also has a sustainable lumber business on his property.
Am I running a chicken farm? No, but I seriously contemplated it at one stage along with running free range meat and milk goats on a similar bunched herd, rotational basis.
Currently we have the Environmentalists believing CO2 is the cause to climate change so lets destroy all the coal burning power stations. This will have an even worse outcome as our world becomes crippled and we become third world populations.
LMAO
Shonky graphs indeed.
Anyway, I have a client who is working on an interesting "battery" storage solution... Kind of a cross between solar and nucleat technology.
There are other projects working on the storage conundrum too. That's the missing link if we want to replace coal and fossil fuels.
(and I have no problem with that as a goal to work towards)
No Ann. NOT ACCURATE at all.
Climate scientists are overwhelmingly certain that human created green house gases (CO2 is one of those) are creating a rapidly warming earth.
One of factors in the excess CO2 in the atmosphere is coal fired power stations so one of the solutions to the problem is replacing them as rapidly as possible with alternative non CO2 producing energy sources.
Solar, Wind, Hyro, Wave, Geo Thermal, Solar Thermal, Maybe even small scale nuclear. But no one is talking about arbitarily closing them down without immediately developing an alternative. I'm afraid your comment is just another one of the misleading "talking points" created by the same people who produced that shonky doco you quoted.
And I would still be interested in your response to the 8 particular lies/misrepresentations picked up in the Great Global Warming Swindle. It's all very well to promote robust scientific debate. But using shonky graphs, misleading and out of date comments and misrepresenting scientists isn't cool Ann.
______________________________________________________
PS Quite impressed with the Joel Salatin agriculture model. Good find.
Ann I capped my "Not Accurate" comment after some thought. In my mind it was least inflammatory way of responding to your suggestion that environmentalists wanted to destroy all coal fired power stations (immediately ?) and send us into the dark ages. As I said, it seems to be one of the grossly exaggerated "talking points" used by CC deniers to misinfirm people.
With regard to the lies /misrepresentations on The Great Swindle. The issues I pointed out were recognised within days of the doco being broadcast. They were already understood. That is why some of the most dishonest statements were withdrawn or adjusted. The point about these lies is their reflection on the people who made the doco and the sources they used to try and say GW " wasn't happening, or wasn't serious and in any case it's The Sun".
Ann it was you who introduced the doco as a great example of true sceptical science. I wonder if you have reconsidered your views after considering the misrepresentions made in the doco ?
Science moving ahead ? Absolutely since 2007 world temperatures have increased by about .3C . That is HUGE in terms of its effect on cities, eco systems, Greenland/Antartica. I wonder climate change denial sources have to say about these events?
Do you want colder winters (in the Northern Hemispehere) Ann ? Well CC could certainly bring that about - while still cooking the rest of the globe. But that is one of the potential consequences of abrupt climate change.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/
Climate change is slowing Atlantic currents that help keep Europe warm
https://theconversation.com/climate...tic-currents-that-help-keep-europe-warm-94930
April 12, 2018 11.13pm AEST
Climate Change: Global Temperature
Author:
Rebecca Lindsey and LuAnn Dahlman
August 1, 2018
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature
I don’t think anyone would dispute that CO2 is an insulator, the science is well understood on that one.
What effect the actual change in atmospheric concentration being made will have is the unanswered question.
Inadequate fuel supplies being maintained at certain facilities is a problem.
Well we seem to have plenty of gas to sell overseas.
I don't see why a national gas reservation policy seems to be on the nose with both parties.
Gas stations seem ideal for baseload, easier to start or ramp up or down than coal.
Sure, gas won't last forever but as an intermediate step untill sufficient renewable energy is developed it should be the focus of new baseload generation for a while at least ?
We shouldn't have to burn anything IMO. Solar and hydro will give us baseload power once they've solved the technicals of transmitting it reliably. Just comes down to funding. And that comes from exporting coal and gas rather than burning it. Co2 aside... the economics of coal has a use-by date based on a dwindling need or want. Flog it off before that date eventuatesWell we seem to have plenty of gas to sell overseas.
I don't see why a national gas reservation policy seems to be on the nose with both parties.
Gas stations seem ideal for baseload, easier to start or ramp up or down than coal.
Sure, gas won't last forever but as an intermediate step untill sufficient renewable energy is developed it should be the focus of new baseload generation for a while at least ?
We shouldn't have to burn anything IMO. Solar and hydro will give us baseload power once they've solved the technicals of transmitting it reliably.
It could've been done by now had it not been for the unwieldy flip floppery of 2¾ Govts.Sure, but how long will it take to solve the technical problems ?
Links have been quoted in the "Future of electricity generation and storage" thread about the problems of intermittency and its effect on grid stability.
I would be quite happy if we got 100% from renewables but I don't see that happening for decades and backup is needed in the meantime.
I hadn't seen the movie, so can't comment, but all graphs, excpt the ones I agree with, are shonkyBy the way those graphs I cited in The Great Swindle are as a shonky as $3 notes Wayne. But you do realise that...don't you ?
From the paper linked:In fact no that is not the case Smurf as it turns out.
Crucially, Reilly, Arasteh and Rubin ensured they tested for the coupled effects of conduction and radiation (not convection because climate science isn’t concerned with convection).
carbon dioxide only serves as a coolant in industry applications
the wider the gap in the double-glazed panes the more the CO2 gas filler showed U-value energy loss
Sanyo developed that country’s first commercially-viable CO2 refrigerant which they say (ironically) could “greatly contribute to the prevention of global warming.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?