- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 19,662
- Reactions
- 11,963
the IPCC even admit its a hoax and nothing to do with the environment!
Any documentation for that statement ?
the IPCC even admit its a hoax and nothing to do with the environment!
While the rate of methane leakage was higher while the stoves were in use, the amount of time spent not in use meant the overall volume of methane leaked was greatest during this time."Our biggest surprise was that most of the methane we measured leaked to the air while the stoves were off."
It was provided in the link!Any documentation for that statement ?
That was a fabrication (in simple terms you posted a lie) - find the original German version and I will translate it for you.It was provided in the link!
Indeed it is. For over two hundred years the first world overload our planet with CO2 but you now want to blame the most populous nation that still has half the per capita carbon footprint that you have.it’s rather self evident and explanatory!
you only claim it’s a lie as it doesn’t suit your narrative! It’s a well documented quote and interviews!That was a fabrication (in simple terms you posted a lie) - find the original German version and I will translate it for you.
Lol!Indeed it is. For over two hundred years the first world overload our planet with CO2 but you now want to blame the most populous nation that still has half the per capita carbon footprint that you have.
It's a proven fabrication - as my earlier link showed - so the lie sits with you.you only claim it’s a lie as it doesn’t suit your narrative! It’s a well documented quote and interviews!
Sorry... that's not true either. Their emissions have increased due mostly to western nations offshoring production, and there is no counter to this fact.There total omission rates are skyrocketing
Just to reiterate how little you know, in 2020 China led the world in renewable capacity added, accounting for nearly half of all installations. China added nearly 117 GW, bringing online more renewable capacity in 2020 than the entire world did in 2013 and almost doubling its additions from 2019.if there was any truth if it was to save the planet and renewables actually were some what useful China would not be building coal power stations for staters it would be bulldog renewables!
Most people believe the opposite is true.any muppet that peddles renewables thinking that work has the iq or a house plant
It's a proven fabrication - as my earlier link showed - so the lie sits with you.
why are they building all those new coal fired power stations! there omissions are already nearly 1/3 rd of the worlds totalSorry... that's not true either. Their emissions have increased due mostly to western nations offshoring production, and there is no counter to this fact.
Just to reiterate how little you know, in 2020 China led the world in renewable capacity added, accounting for nearly half of all installations. China added nearly 117 GW, bringing online more renewable capacity in 2020 than the entire world did in 2013 and almost doubling its additions from 2019.
Most people believe the opposite is true.
"I guess an analogy to that is you can think of like COVID cases."Because we've got such a clear trend in temperatures across the whole of Australia, including in Western Australia, it's just quite easy to break records these days," he said.
An interesting thing about WA is that the decline hasn't occurred in manner that correlates to anything obvious but rather, has occurred as distinct "steps" downward in runoff.Rainfall has declined significantly in the last 50 years over WA's south-west.
Going off at a bit of a tangent to the discussion here, but related... We are about to buy a property here in WA. First order of priority is contingency planning should the power go down or is insufficient.An interesting thing about WA is that the decline hasn't occurred in manner that correlates to anything obvious but rather, has occurred as distinct "steps" downward in runoff.
It's as though someone simply flicked a switch and said that's it, we're going to level 1 climate change as of midnight tonight and that's it, done. Then came back later and turned it up to level 2.
Far less extreme but the same "sudden step" pattern exists in Tasmania also. Get a bar chart of runoff records and it's very clear that there was no gradual decline, it's a sudden step change.
Politics around climate change and solutions to reducing emissions etc aside, there's some interesting science there in terms of what's going on to cause that response since there isn't a direct correlation with something obvious. Not sure about WA but Tas has done quite a bit of research at the state level looking for an explanation.
You have missed the real point about the difference between weather and climate.As you have told us repeatedly, one off events or even one season events are weather, not climate change.
Weather sites forecast La Nina and it arrived, so all good so far.
Why are we having floods, because over the past few decades many more houses have been built on flood plains.
Why higher then previously, often times, it is because the overflow areas up river that used to hold the water for a week or more no longer exist, they have been filled and have houses on them.
Just in my area, along the banks of the Hunter river, which is a dangerous river for flooding, there are dozens of houses which have been built right next to the river.
The Councils have allowed people to build flood island for their houses, they have created mounds up to 10m high and 100m long and there can be 6 or 8 in a row.
These have become a virtual levee bank preventing the water from spilling out over the farmlands as it has done so for centuries.
By changing the flow of the river and directing all of the water back into the river it will result in higher floods in Raymond Terrace.
When it does, someone will cry climate change, old hands will say "We told you so"
Macca you overlook the fact that the volume and intensity of rainfall has trashed all records. But on a practical basis flood insurance is almost impossible in many areas. On top of that the insurance costs of natural disasters (even when companies have not insured whole areas) is raising insurance premiums around the country.
This isn't going away.
You are writing from the perspective of a person who confuses the past with the future.No one is suggesting that it is going away, as so often happens, activists have it back to front.
People who suggest that it has all happened are in fact saying, we need to learn to live with it and stop being like chicken little every time an unusual weather event happens.
I find it intriguing as to why CC lovers have this blind belief that ALL weather extremes have conveniently happened within the past 200 years so that we have had the opportunity to write them all down.
Anything outside of that is seen as catastrophic, yet, the Elders of the Sydney tribes have said before, that when Macquarie was shown around Windsor after the big flood, he was warned that a much bigger flood happened when they were young.
They indicated that the flood was up to 5 metres above the present debris in the trees.
Everyone needs to accept the fact that weather events are unpredictable, another example for you.
Brisbane Will get hit by a cyclone, when it does everyone will scream climate change, but in reality it did happen a few times before the white fellas got there.
I live quite a "green life" (not the Fake greens Party) but close to nature, it bugs me when I see all the litter that people toss into our parks and waterways.
It bugs me when people won't reuse, a lot of people recycle but that actually uses power to make the change, I mean reuse, as in a second hand item, so many useful things are thrown out in the Council clean ups.
So I am doing my bit locally in the hope that it helps but then I see photos of all the junk flowing out of Asian countries as they happily pump out pollution and everyone gives them a free ride.
Maybe we should be targeting the pollution we can see coming out of rivers and fouling the air, no one can argue about that so "there it is, clean it up".
Not just western countries but every country, with penalties if they don't do it
As with most things, the truth is somewhere in the middle.I find it intriguing as to why CC lovers have this blind belief that ALL weather extremes have conveniently happened within the past 200 years so that we have had the opportunity to write them all down
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.