We are going to get a bit screwed upgrading the grid but seriously this will happen and faster than you think.It's bs. If we keep immigration up then we will never hit the target. It's next to impossible. We are one of the fast growing nations in terms of immigration.
I thought we could double our way out to lower per capita. But it's based on 26% below 2005 levels. Immigration is going to make it near iimpossible to meet that target.
Building new homes and everything that comes with that means emissions are going up. It's either going to mean super high electricity prices and other strict restrictions to meet targets. We are talking in the vicinity of 50% per person over the next decade years.
Better we start to engage with Asia. Screw Europe. I don't think it's possibly unless we see tech advances.
If there was any truth to this crap fingers would be pointing at China, India etc that they are not! PeriodIt's bs. If we keep immigration up then we will never hit the target. It's next to impossible. We are one of the fast growing nations in terms of immigration.
I thought we could double our way out to lower per capita. But it's based on 26% below 2005 levels. Immigration is going to make it near iimpossible to meet that target.
Building new homes and everything that comes with that means emissions are going up. It's either going to mean super high electricity prices and other strict restrictions to meet targets. We are talking in the vicinity of 50% per person over the next decade years.
Better we start to engage with Asia. Screw Europe. I don't think it's possibly unless we see tech advances.
The reason Australia is so high in per capita emissions compared to China is because Australia was industrialised many decades ago, while China remains a developing nation. I realise this is not an idea you can come to grips with.building new replacing old so still keeping coal as a main source of power yet Australia can’t!
Only a muppet can’t work out the hypocrisy of it all and how usless and a scam the green
As I have often said, the west has sent its manufacturing to China which equates to significant CO2 being offshored. Interestingly, however, is the fact that Chinese manufacturing is now state of the art and actually uses much less energy now to make the same products.Showing no signs of slowing down! Nearly 1/3 of the worlds total and keep climbing yet the west needy to stop eating beef as the cows farting is the problem!
I guarantee you have never read Das Kapital, and have no idea what Leninism involved, which makes you the perfect useful idiot in trying to deride those ideologies.Learn some history of communism and Lenin he referred to you lot as “useful idiots” educated idiots who think they are intelligent it’s the simple of the most stupid!
Perhaps your only credible post to date in a sort of backhand way.I guarantee you have never read Das Kapital,
The Southern Ocean circulates warming waters from around the world, pushing them deep towards Antarctica where they lap against the colder ice."One of the issues for Antarctic glaciers at the moment is them being eaten away from underneath by warming waters coming down from the north."
But but but if we don’t act now the world will end says mr Schwab!The reason Australia is so high in per capita emissions compared to China is because Australia was industrialised many decades ago, while China remains a developing nation. I realise this is not an idea you can come to grips with.
As I have often said, the west has sent its manufacturing to China which equates to significant CO2 being offshored. Interestingly, however, is the fact that Chinese manufacturing is now state of the art and actually uses much less energy now to make the same products.
I guarantee you have never read Das Kapital, and have no idea what Leninism involved, which makes you the perfect useful idiot in trying to deride those ideologies.
Most of the world's populations belong to developing or undeveloped nations and their shares of CO2 are all rising as they attempt to modernise. You conveniently neglect the fact that most G20 nations have offshored significant production to China and that this production is now much less carbon intensive than from where it originated.so you think that Mother Nature or climate change or (insert new name) cares if China is still an emerging economy?
Lenin had no interest in propaganda.yes I have read enough on Lenin and communism and know allabout how propaganda works! You clearly don’t!
The narrative has not changed for 4 decades so what are you talking about?I mean how many times do they want to change the narrative and shift the goal posts and the useful idiots keep believing it
It's an excellent story. I have to say the headline is misleading. All the way through the article the opportunities for using green energy as the source for aluminium smelting is spelt out. And finally the solar energy industry itself is a small part of the aluminium industry.Interesting article
From the article:Catch 2050: Demand for solar panels presents 'global warming risk' through raw material production
The global community will need almost 60 times more solar power to reach net zero emissions by 2050, but the emissions-intensive aluminium required to do so presents an environmental risk, a new study has found.www.abc.net.au
"Australia is actually the largest producer of bauxite, and one of the largest producers of alumina — so there's a real opportunity for Australia to play a big role in this growth of renewable energy."
The study revealed that for the global community to reach net zero by 2050, about 60 terawatts of solar power along with 480 megatons of aluminium would be required.
Currently, there is 0.8 terawatts, or 800 gigawatts of solar available globally.
what like building hundard's of new coal fired power stations that will have some 50/60 year life span?Most of the world's populations belong to developing or undeveloped nations and their shares of CO2 are all rising as they attempt to modernise. You conveniently neglect the fact that most G20 nations have offshored significant production to China and that this production is now much less carbon intensive than from where it originated.
FFS! Lenin was Mr Propaganda. LMAO!Lenin had no interest in propaganda.
remember the green house effect, ozone layers, global warming, global cooling, climate change etcThe narrative has not changed for 4 decades so what are you talking about?
Australia's emissions are about twice China's per capita and still you claim the high ground!so chinas omissions sky rocket but Australia who's omossions are dropping must act to save the world while the major omitters are ignored!
LMAO
The evidence on climate change is available to everyone so what are you claiming?the scaremongering is nothing more than a way to control government, industry globalization & control of the worlds wealth.
basicaly they want to be rich and you poor! do they care about you no
No! You keep missing the point and attempting to take the higher ground and going around in circles!Australia's emissions are about twice China's per capita and still you claim the high ground!
The evidence on climate change is available to everyone so what are you claiming?
Your posts are mostly nonsensical and there is nothing you have said in this thread that suggests you know anything about the topic.
If you knew anything about this topic you would know that China building more new nuclear plants than any other country.there was any truth to the climate change China would not be doing this. They would be using nuclear or going and pay more attention to nicola teslas idea of kinetic energy from magnets
You are in General Chat and you have shown no ability to make a valid point on climate.No they aren’t they are digging endless more toxic materials from the ground polluting and destroying the land with these usless windmills and solar panels. Your on a stock market forum and clearly have nfi how any of the monotony flows works or about any politics
well you clearly dont!If you knew anything about this topic you would know that China building more new nuclear plants than any other country.
You are in General Chat and you have shown no ability to make a valid point on climate.
Do you also belong with the idiot conspiracy theorists who also believe the moon landing was fake?IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer, speaking in November 2010, advised that: “…one has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. Instead, climate change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth...”
In Their Own Words: Climate Alarmists Debunk Their 'Science'
It is way past time to realize that none of this is really about protecting the planet from man-made climate change. It never was.www.forbes.com
Thank you for not addressing the post like usual!Do you also belong with the idiot conspiracy theorists who also believe the moon landing was fake?
You will find your quote was debunked in an earlier post of mine to the forum years ago.
Is there anything you do know about climate?
Read the thread title and you might work out why your off topic remarks don't get answered.Thank you for not addressing the post like usual!
How’s it a conspiracy when it’s coming straight from the mouth of the IPCC.
lolRead the thread title and you might work out why your off topic remarks don't get answered.
As for your quote, it was a fabrication, but you don't seem to know anything about climate so I guess you were unable to work it out.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?