- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,820
- Reactions
- 24,827
I'm with plod in that its too late to do anything in Australia (or the world for that matter) for any meaningful effect, except for preparation and sandbagging.
I just find it sad, that there it has to be so black or white, a person is either an absolute believer and treats it as a religion, otherwise they are classed as a denier.
I guess perception management companies, find that works best?
The church has been using the same ploy for centuries, you are a believer, or you go to hell.
Again, focus on this topic which you continue to attach "religion" to rather than science.Rob I know you are passionate about it and your self belief is unshakable, but it doesn't make you 100% correct in everything you quote.
Just re read your posts in the Folau thread, to show that an absolute belief in an outcome, doesn't mean it will be so.
Again, focus on this topic which you continue to attach "religion" to rather than science.
You understand how a power plant generates electricity and would have no difficulty telling someone who was clueless. There will be a lot that goes on that you do not need to know because the simplicity of a power plant is that a source of energy is converted to a flow of electrons that can be externally distributed.
In climate there is a source of energy - namely the sun - that heats the planet and keeps it warm because an amount of that energy is retained through the blanket effect of the atmosphere. If the blanket effect retains more energy then the planet warms over time.
People can throw as many curve balls as they like but this is a matter of physics ruling the outcome, just as the energy equation for your power plant can be calculated.
When you work out that the maths or physics is wrong let us all know because you are confusing this with ideas about being passionate over something.
If you don't care then don't post your ideas that science is equal to a religion unless you understand what you are talking about and can make a credible case.I actually don't give a rats ar$e one way or the other and don't go bashing people around the ears.
I only mentioned that it is a shame that the debate has to be so black versus white, well since then my point has been well and truly proven IMO.
You're feckin joking Knobby, @rederob is the king of ad hom!
Again, nobody denies warming, it has been warming since the little Ice age.He is overtly aggressive, but that's not what I said.
Instead of arguing science it's all religion, Greta, hypocrites' ….paper tigers.
In other works the "not happening" argument has been lost and most people know it, at least subconsciously. It's happening.
Even in Antarctica, which should be years away from warming effects, looks crap.
The models have been too conservative.
View attachment 99073
Nailed it.https://babylonbee.com/news/poll-fi...ue-to-be-lectured-by-climate-change-activists
"...Over 87% of respondents selected, "Bring on the tidal wave." A few people said they'd rather take the lectures, but after hearing a few minutes of the lectures, quickly changed their minds..."
View attachment 99072
Some people recognise fake news when they see it - you have responded to a post in the wrong thread!Nailed it.
Some people recognise fake news when they see it - you have responded to a post in the wrong thread!
Nailed it.No Way!!! Are you saying that was fake news !!
What absolute rubbish..
I could point to half a dozen world Presidents and prime Ministers, a score of media owners, a thousand billionaires and many of our most prolific and erudite posters on ASF who would back the sentiments of that story to the hilt.
In fact they would twist the knife and stick it in again for good measure. There is reality for you.
The message is still pertinent, though obviously wasted.Some people recognise fake news when they see it - you have responded to a post in the wrong thread!
That also is self explanatory, you and Bas slapping each others back.Nailed it.
Yep, you just posted in it.Isn’t there a thread on conceited boomers?
Exactly where was the science?The message is still pertinent, though obviously wasted.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?