wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,807
- Reactions
- 13,022
Which ever assets their own research and opinions tell them will perform the best.
I think that 'Spending less than you earn" and 'Investing the difference" is more important than trying to time and second guess the market.
For instance if you bought toll shares 10 years and about 3 stock spilts ago it doesn't really matter if you timed the market and bought at $1.90 or you over paid and bought in at $2.90 a share you would be sitting pretty right now,... even though there has been some ups and downs you still would be worth over $40 per share by now.
If your saving $100 a week every week and investing it throughout gloom and boom in a range of asset classes I don't think you can go wrong. I don't really believe in trying to time markets I don't trade the bulk of my portfolio.
I probably only trade less than 10% of my holdings, the rest are buy and hold.
If my stocks go down in this slump It doesn't really phase me I am purchasing about $1000 a month every month, so I will pick the stock out of my portfolio that is the best value and increase my holdings,
OK I'm confused now. Tech and yourself are advocating property and creating opportunities in it, and when questioned about the $20 per hour guy suggest the stockmarket... something I would suggest. Huh?
What do you property guys suggest a $20 an hour guy do, in "creating value" as tech put it, in the property market?