Interesting charts Edwood. Is the Pesavento type analysis you are using??
I am mulling over Gold at present. There has been so much hype and bullishness surrounding this advance that I can't help feeling that it may not rocket as much as most expect, as such I am gonna sit this one out.
Cheers
Not 100% confident.. or any where near it.. but I am watching from the sidelines looking for a retrace...
Cheers
.........Kauri
The year 2007 is the slowest production of gold since the year 1922.
Hopefully someone will read it again. Supply/Demand. It is quite simple really or am I missing the plot.
Should I post a chart?
The year 2007 is the slowest production of gold since the year 1922.
Hopefully someone will read it again. Supply/Demand. It is quite simple really or am I missing the plot.
Should I post a chart?
Once again, the bullish COT set up was accurate in predicting the impressive recent $70 gold rally. Less impressive has been the rally in silver, which appears to being dragged upward by gold. If one were to analyze strictly on short-term price behavior, the price action in silver could not be considered constructive. Then again, short-term price behavior is not the way to properly analyze a market.
While gold has performed admirably price-wise, the COTs suggest it may now be time for caution. The gold COTs, for the week ended September 4, deteriorated by more than 25,000 contracts net, due to tech fund buying and dealer selling. More importantly, extrapolation from the cut-off date indicates significant further gold COT deterioration, perhaps by 30 to 40,000 contracts or more. The sharp rally in gold took us from a very bullish COT market structure to a bearish structure. Tops are much more difficult to call than bottoms, and we still may have a ways to go in price, but from a COT perspective, there are caution flags flying in gold.
In addition, there has been impressive buying in the GLD gold ETF, to the tune of around 1.5 million ounces. On top of that, the Australian gold miner Newcrest announced it had pre-purchased 2.3 million ounces of gold in the last week, to close out its gold hedge book.
All told, from just the COMEX, the GLD and Newcrest (allowing for overlap), some 10 million gold ounces or more were purchased recently (paper and metal), with a total value of near $7 billion. That’s a lot of money and a lot of gold. In some ways, considering these amounts, the price rally in gold is somewhat subdued. (I shudder when I think of the potential price impact on silver if a fraction of that money found its way to silver). Of course, this same amount of gold was sold, with most of those sales being of the short-sale variety.
so I can't mention mention what it was and if it happens or what may happen.
Yep, needs to hold above long term support at US$700 (which actually goes beack to 1980/81) with consilidation, and yes up like a rocket from there. But could be a further shake out yet as alluded to by Bean, but not that low however.
Fundamentally, US dollar is at an all time low and continuing to weaken. Interesting the press seem to be avoiding this event. Not lost on the gold bugs however.
Insight into what might happen? Is this the part about gold crashing at the end of last week bean? Going back to $540. No you've amended that. To? Or, is this the bit about gold either breaking up, or down, and that we will know when it happens?I have since subsribed to a site to see if what I had spotted may have been correct. so I can't mention mention what it was and if it happens or what may happen. Some things of what I mentioned on my last few posts maybe show an insight of what may happen..False hope?
Insight into what might happen? Is this the part about gold crashing at the end of last week bean? Going back to $540. No you've amended that. To? Or, is this the bit about gold either breaking up, or down, and that we will know when it happens?You crack me up bean.
question
The round numbers are important in gold technicals but I can't see that the $700 level has acted as any particularly significant technical support or resistance over the years. [end quote]
About February 80 the US$700 acted as support then several times in August the same year it became resistance, a head and shoulders to a period of support in November where it then fell away.
On closer inspection, (I was just looking at a rough round number and in retrospect should not have done that) I was a bit high. The area of support is more at $660 and I think others on the forum may have indicated that.
Should have looked closer and apologies for that.
"I was looking for something (a pattern) in US markets today did not happen
But spotted something else that did"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?