- Joined
- 17 January 2007
- Posts
- 2,986
- Reactions
- 32
I had a thought; people keep using the term 'safe haven', and with the intent of avoiding volatility.
But, is gold really that safe a haven? It's just rallied so hard in a matter of months (& years!) if it were a stock I'd say it was overbought! In the short term, is there not a risk of rather significant losses here? Not to mention all the complications from different currencies! (Especially when entering at these levels)
What bothers me, is that the rise isn't driven by a massive increase in need, but rather a want ... just seems dangerous.
In 05' gold was at 500/600-something, wasn't it? 3 years later we're sitting on nearly 1000 ... that's a fairly significant rise, for something that's supposedly stable.
Overbought? Short term trading possibly yes. Depends what you compare it too. Not overbought relative to the money supply M3. Not overbought relative to it's inflation adjusted value. Relative to any number of 'things' it is still 'cheap'?
I posted the chart below on the oil thread, but also serves as a comparison between relative commodity price appreciation over the last few years. If you compare it with the energy bull, golds advance is still rather orderly, but more to the point is still only just starting to enter the parabolic stage?
The danger with thinking that a secular bull trend has run too hard is that gold is in blue sky now. It has momentum & growing widespread, diverse support from non investment types ie the general public is aware.
There will be pullbacks, some severe. We may be in for another 'consolidation' phase if the Fed decides to digest the 75 bp cut though, to be offset by a deepening of the US recession or the contagion spreading further eg China (the saviour of the world ), or, deflation rear's it's ugly head.