- Joined
- 16 June 2005
- Posts
- 4,281
- Reactions
- 6
Been some trades today on the puts Gazelle was looking at CBAKM7 - first time they have traded for quite a while. If Gazelle has bought them - perhaps he would be kind enough to explain the analysis?
This thread sucks
Waste of time reading
QUESTION: "Gann, honestly, is it a good basis for trading?"
ANSWER: No! Because no body seems to bloody trade it!
I don't even see how its practical
Average joe is about to buy some shares.. oh frick i'll have to wait until saturn lines up with jupiter before i buy these
Cheers
Brad
Hi Sails , I didnt end up taking the trade , the 23rd bought in a marginal secondary high but I just didnt feel confident in the way it was setting up so I passed this one up . that doesnt matter there will always be something else .
Beamstas : Were you standing behind the door when the brains were handed out or were you issued with a half serve . Simpletons like you are a constant form of amuesment around here . Why dont you totter off and play with your little ipod .
.
Beamstas : Were you standing behind the door when the brains were handed out or were you issued with a half serve.
actually the constant emotio0nal outbursts in your replies leads to me believe that you actually dont posess the qualities needed to be a succesful trader regardless of how much gobbledygook you spew on these pages
still no proof of trades
no nothing except childish insults at ANYONE that trys to detract from gann spruikers
have a nice day darl and please control your emotions
...Sails . 45 90 days and 10 years into that date . these were some of the reasons I was looking at the possibility of a top into this date . when dealing with long term fixed cycles you have to make considerations for leap years . once long term and intermediate time cycles move into proportionate alignment you can look for evidence of a change in trend . This must be confirmed by other factors and always set your stops and predetermine profit targets before initiating a trade .
Trader Paul, lets say someone asks you out of genuine interest the following:
ASF Member : "Trader Paul, if there is a stong probability, based on your analysis, of x happenning on a particular date (ie. a very positive cycle for August), how do you trade it TP?
Can someone just post a nice chart with analysis. Damn, this thread is beginning to sound like a broken record.
Warmest Regards
ST
Hi ST (and anybody else, who can hold an intelligent conversation),
Maybe you should just go over to the other Gann thread, where we
discussed some of Gann's astroanalysis on COH ... over the past couple
of weeks ..... and just updated it this morning .....
..... some very simple stuff, that everybody can understand,
complete with the chart that you requested as well, ST ...
have a great day
paul
=====
Yep. fair enough. I have no proof of my VERY high suspicion that you don't trade. My info is in part from a PM I received from a fellow ASFer.So you admit, that your attacks on me were based on gossip then, th ... ???
OK, straight to the point. A CHALLENGE. LETS see if there is real value in GANN, and lets make believers of the NON believers. This will be fun!!!!
Starting January 1st 2009 thru December 31st 2009 let us all make a record of our chosen trading account, with starting balance and closing balance. At the end of the year those that choose to continue to argue about the merits of this approach will be given a chance to show if they are real traders. We will get an independent auditor and accountant to review the trading statements. Posting these on a public forum is understandably an issue. Anyone considered the taxation implications!!!!!
Those that are skeptical of GANN, choose your representative to represent you as your champion VERSUS ME. I will represent GANN. At the end of the year if my trading account shows a greater return, then I pay nothing for the costs in getting this challenge independently audited. Further to that lets put up a dollar wager of 10,000 USD to the winner!! The loser pays the winner 10,000 USD plus all costs associated with this challenge. We will get a solicitor to arrange setting up the contract, all legal and above board.
I think this will silence the critics once and for all. Warning any shallow and mindless responses to this will be obvious.
There is NO doubt that a highly focused and successful day trader can generate returns at a much faster rate than a position trader
but the volume figures would be a reason why these trades couldn't be done with real money?..... and there's no reason, why this cannot be done in real-time,
with real money ... !~!
From your post these are only paper trades,
but these volumes could not have been transacted in reality, right?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.