greggles
I'll be back!
- Joined
- 28 July 2004
- Posts
- 4,460
- Reactions
- 4,494
Scandals in the franchising sector just keep bubbling to the surface in recent times.
While Retail Food Group is probably the most prominent and widely reported of the franchise disasters, there are many more. Caltex are exiting the franchise model due to a wage fraud scandal and several media outlets today have reported that Red Rooster, Oporto and Chicken Treats store owners are being pushed to the brink by high costs and operating restrictions imposed upon them by Craveable Brands, the company that controls the chains.
https://www.smh.com.au/business/sma...s-on-verge-of-bankruptcy-20180503-p4zd5c.html
The idea of franchising is that the franchisee buys a well known brand outlet that enables them to operate in an exclusive territory and the franchisor helps the small business owner to grow the business by licensing its business model, intellectual property, and brand identity for ongoing fees. However, the reality appears to be far removed from the ideal, at least in recent times.
Is franchising going the way of other failed concepts like timeshare, or is the root of the problem simply corporate greed rather than the business model itself? Obviously there are more successful examples of the franchise model, McDonalds being one. Subway is another.
The recent scandals haven't done much to encourage people to buy into franchise businesses. Horror stories of financial catastrophe and bankruptcies are haunting the sector. Is more regulation the answer, or is the current situation going to result in an inevitable shakeout and a process of consolidation and improved business practices?
While Retail Food Group is probably the most prominent and widely reported of the franchise disasters, there are many more. Caltex are exiting the franchise model due to a wage fraud scandal and several media outlets today have reported that Red Rooster, Oporto and Chicken Treats store owners are being pushed to the brink by high costs and operating restrictions imposed upon them by Craveable Brands, the company that controls the chains.
https://www.smh.com.au/business/sma...s-on-verge-of-bankruptcy-20180503-p4zd5c.html
The idea of franchising is that the franchisee buys a well known brand outlet that enables them to operate in an exclusive territory and the franchisor helps the small business owner to grow the business by licensing its business model, intellectual property, and brand identity for ongoing fees. However, the reality appears to be far removed from the ideal, at least in recent times.
Is franchising going the way of other failed concepts like timeshare, or is the root of the problem simply corporate greed rather than the business model itself? Obviously there are more successful examples of the franchise model, McDonalds being one. Subway is another.
The recent scandals haven't done much to encourage people to buy into franchise businesses. Horror stories of financial catastrophe and bankruptcies are haunting the sector. Is more regulation the answer, or is the current situation going to result in an inevitable shakeout and a process of consolidation and improved business practices?