tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,400
- Reactions
- 6,317
Its been great to sit on the sidelines and watch this un fold.
Seen it many many times.
Elliott Analysis evokes a great deal of passion from hard-line exponents.
Truth is that very few people in the general populace even remotely understand the method and are quick to judge and more often than not pointing out how hopeless it is as an analysis tool because the wave count changes.
WHEN IN FACT I see this as the greatest strength of the analysis.
Ive spent many months over the last 20 yrs studying and implementing Elliott.
In fact it was Elliot Wave Analysis that warned me to halt my portfolio trading within my method "Tech Trader"
Months before the GFC. There are lots of posts at the time on my decision and the analysis both here and on "The Chartist"
Saved me a great deal of $$s.
Rimtas has obviously chosen Elliott as his specialty.
Porper who I have known for years is no slouch when it comes to Elliott.
My view is that if the wave counts aren't as clear as day then I ignore them and us other analysis.
I don't force a count and am aware that the three of us could all have a very different count.
Its been my experience that it doesn't matter.
But its also been my experience that die hard analysts tend to just analyse and have very little expertise in implementing Elliott as a trading method.
If you cant apply the analysis --- what's the point
Personally I'm glad I spent the time to understand the analysis and wouldn't make a longer term decision without applying it.
Keep up the discussion guys---I agree with both of you on a lot of the discussion.
Like Elliott Analysis you/we will agree and disagree.
Seen it many many times.
Elliott Analysis evokes a great deal of passion from hard-line exponents.
Truth is that very few people in the general populace even remotely understand the method and are quick to judge and more often than not pointing out how hopeless it is as an analysis tool because the wave count changes.
WHEN IN FACT I see this as the greatest strength of the analysis.
Ive spent many months over the last 20 yrs studying and implementing Elliott.
In fact it was Elliot Wave Analysis that warned me to halt my portfolio trading within my method "Tech Trader"
Months before the GFC. There are lots of posts at the time on my decision and the analysis both here and on "The Chartist"
Saved me a great deal of $$s.
Rimtas has obviously chosen Elliott as his specialty.
Porper who I have known for years is no slouch when it comes to Elliott.
My view is that if the wave counts aren't as clear as day then I ignore them and us other analysis.
I don't force a count and am aware that the three of us could all have a very different count.
Its been my experience that it doesn't matter.
But its also been my experience that die hard analysts tend to just analyse and have very little expertise in implementing Elliott as a trading method.
If you cant apply the analysis --- what's the point
Personally I'm glad I spent the time to understand the analysis and wouldn't make a longer term decision without applying it.
Keep up the discussion guys---I agree with both of you on a lot of the discussion.
Like Elliott Analysis you/we will agree and disagree.