Value Collector
Have courage, and be kind.
- Joined
- 13 January 2014
- Posts
- 12,237
- Reactions
- 8,483
Thats the biggest factor for me.Fossil fuels won't last forever and as they run out we will be increasingly dependent on overseas sources for liquid fuels.
Electricity we can produce ourselves, sure there are downsides to everything but EV's will dominate the market inside 20 years, like it or not.
EVs not so sure..Fossil fuels won't last forever and as they run out we will be increasingly dependent on overseas sources for liquid fuels.
Electricity we can produce ourselves, sure there are downsides to everything but EV's will dominate the market inside 20 years, like it or not.
1. that used to be cars in general1. EVs are a fantasy indulgence of rich elites in the city.
2. Me, I'm holding on to my petrol Corolla. Enabling me to boil the planet, and cause massive species extinction.
In my Corolla, tootling up to the shops.
firstly evs don’t consume more oil than ice.EVs not so sure..
That is the issue, non oil burning, maybe but why decide the winner and mandate it?
Let's Tesla and byd compete, sure on raw egg oi and economics but government should not decide that a lithium battery and not for example an H2 fuel cell is the answer.
In less than 4 years during WWII, in occupied France, oil was unavailable at all, and the whole trucks and delivery car etc was transformed to use wood gas.
When oil will become too dear, change will come, but we should not decide winner especially when the decision is political and made by people who have a loonnnng history to be both corrupt and always wrong and incompetent.
If an EVs consumes more oil/coal per km in its lifetime than an ICE, do you agree it is not a solution to oil limited availabilty?
I would assume any non brain dead would agree?
So then let's prove within doubt that this is not the case before giving tax incentive and mandates.
Facts, numbers,sciences and technology before ideology and financial lobbies ...
Turns out he loves America but Hates Ev’s, I pointed out that Teslas are All American,
Indeed, I actually thought all Tesla sold here now were China sourced?Apart from the ones built in China that is.
Maybe CF H2, I just say government should not choose the winner.firstly evs don’t consume more oil than ice.
The government isn’t picking the winning Tech, They are saying we should move to emissions free vehicles not a particular Tech.
If some one designs a H2 vehicle that can compete thats fine, but you said you were worried able supply chains and charging etc, it’s going to be much harder to install H2 fuelling and distribution.
Also, you said you were worried about the 5-10% energy loss on charging a battery, the energy loss on making and using H2 is huge in comparison .
Correct as far as I can find out.Indeed, I actually thought all Tesla sold here now were China sourced?
Well yeah, but all the ones sold in the USA are American made, and even the ones made in China are still creating profits for the USAApart from the ones built in China that is.
They aren’t1. Maybe CF H2, I just say government should not choose the winner.
"firstly evs don’t consume more oil than ice."
Prove it, per km,including obviously from manufacturing to let's say death of vehicle and recycling, and where the power to charge it come from..even your solar panels before they give you your "free" green power need a huge amount of coal, gas and oil to be ready on your roof.
I understand you do not put fuel in your Tesla..but if Australia can not even produce green power which is producing less CO2..so fossil fuels..than a fossil fuel equivalent plant in 2024, who can?
We actually produce huge amounts of renewable energy here wind, solar and hydro make up a big chunk of our energy supply and they are growing.Ohh yes Iceland or Quebec..or nuclear power but another story.
but we are neither
Then there is the manufacturing of fhe battery, transport of (heavier) vehicles etc
Anyway , so far, an Australian average 20k km a year EVs is not saving any fossil fuel on its lifetime.
Anyway another subject..part of the shabby EVs save the world BS..
Perhaps as the prices of fuel escalates the use of sweat machines in the inner city burbs may make a bigger come back. Back in the day when I was an apprentice, I use to ride the bike to work every day. Constantly beat the buses and didn't have any parking worries.Fossil fuels won't last forever and as they run out we will be increasingly dependent on overseas sources for liquid fuels.
Electricity we can produce ourselves, sure there are downsides to everything but EV's will dominate the market inside 20 years, like it or not.
And they can be electric but if successful, you will soon need a licence, a rego, pay a parking fee, a helmet and be fined if speeding ..last2 already implementedPerhaps as the prices of fuel escalates the use of sweat machines in the inner city burbs may make a bigger come back. Back in the day when I was an apprentice, I use to ride the bike to work every day. Constantly beat the buses and didn't have any parking worries.
Mate, don't even go there about changing my mind.Well then yeah in your extreme case maybe stick to petrol cars for the next few years.
charging times aren’t as big a deal as you think, you charge at home at night, and for most people never have to charge away from the house.
if you do end up doing 400 kms+ in day, you stop for 10mins just to add enough to get home and do a full charge at home, you don’t have to sit at a charger waiting for it to go to 100%, you just need enough to get home.
its the same on a road trip, you need to stop to pee, so you plug in charge for a few minutes and keep driving, you don’t wait for 100%.
I do Sydney - Brisbane route a couple of times a year, it takes me no longer than the petrol car used to. Instead of having to fuel up at the start like I would with the petrol car, I start with a full battery about 3 hours into the drive we stop for a pee break and 15 mins charging, then drive for another 3 hours by then it’s lunch time the so plug in grab lunch, keep driving then one more 20 min stop some where gets us to north of Sydney Where the family is. most people need to make at least 2 fuel stops to do that trip eg one at start and one somewhere near the end to fuel up again, it to mention food and drink.
i really think that once you see an EV in the hands of a real user and not a cyclical talking head on the internet you will change your mind about a lot of the things.
Understood.Yep they were all tossed out.
States are not allowed to charge the Tax. The fuel excise they say they want to replace is a federal tax, The states were just trying to cash grab.
The States charge for vehicle registration, which EV’s already pay, they really have no right to try and charge additional amounts.
There are four main ways roads are funded
1. Local government rates - EV owners pay already.
2. Vehicle Rego - Ev owners pay that already
3. Tolls - Ev owners pay that already
4. Fuel excise - Ev’s don’t pay this but they do pay GST on electricity they purchase. Fuel excise is a federal tax and up to the federal government to decide not states, for the moment they are choosing not to tax EV’s because of the other benefits worth incentivising eg. Lower air pollution, less green house gases, etc etc
With Australia and Russia the only developed nations left without fuel-efficiency rules, the nation is in a race to catch up. That has car makers watching closely to see the government does not go "too hard, too fast".
Mate, don't even go there about changing my mind.
If the bush aka remote and regional Australia had the same benefits, e.g. services, infrastructure, funding, privileges as you east coasters, our EV discussion wouldn't even be entered into.
Sure, no worries cobber, it's called the Baaka!mate, cry me a river
Sure, no worries cobber, it's called the Baaka!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?