JohnDe
La dolce vita
- Joined
- 11 March 2020
- Posts
- 3,967
- Reactions
- 5,849
1,000 km range for us would in reality equate to about7 50 to 800 km range, because most of our driving is at freeway speeds.At a recent Shanghai auto expo, the world's largest battery maker unveiled a battery it claimed could power electric aircraft or propel electric vehicles (EVs) beyond 1,000 kilometres on a single charge.
Chinese Amperex Technology Limited (CATL), which makes one-third of the world's EV batteries, shared few details about the technology but said it would start mass production later this year.
It was the latest in a series of big announcements for the industry, which is booming with the global shift to electrification.
Battery design has been likened to a gold rush, as researchers push the boundaries of materials chemistry and develop lighter, longer-lasting, safer, cheaper batteries that charge more quickly.
Better batteries mean more affordable cars, cheaper electricity for the home, and ways of travelling overseas without emitting tonnes of CO2.
"If you think about our electrified lives, if you took away batteries, none of this is possible," said Adam Best, a principal research scientist at CSIRO.
"But people don't think about batteries."
So, here's how battery technology has improved over the past decade, and where it's going in the future.
Since being developed about 50 years ago, the amount of energy these batteries store per kilogram, known as their specific energy, has incrementally improved.
Most EV batteries have a specific energy of under 300Wh/kg.
CATL says its new battery almost doubles that figure, with a specific energy of 500Wh/kg.
Unfortunately, the company has not released many other details, including what this battery would cost, how many times it can be recharged, or how much power it can produce (how fast the stored energy can be used).
CATL says the new design will go into mass production later this year and be used in civil aviation and road transport.
If the battery is as good as it claims, it will mean EVs can drive from Sydney to Melbourne on a single charge.
We bought the Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid S.
Lovely car, great tech. Looking forward to getting it November.
Battery sits in the boot so you don't get a spare tire. Instead you get the pump glue thing popular in Europe.
Don't think so. That's the sports car that they share.I've been told that the body structure and design is Toyota; is that true?
Interesting dose of reality ???
Interesting dose of reality ???
Interesting dose of reality ???
If we're smart about how it's done, there's no reason why the existing network, mostly unimproved, can't deliver energy to charge EV's. The very nature of EV's as a storage device that spends large amounts of time parked means there's no fundamental reason why they need to be charged during the peak demand period.Electricity and the grid. really are we still going on about that? there is not going to be an overnight or even a year when there will be a flood of EVs that will kill the system. EVs are increasing slowly and gradually, the electrical system can cope while we increase power and improve the grid.
Interesting dose of reality ???
Yes,a solar plant and H2O and you can get syn fuel.now and in a 1000y if needed..I had a couple of beers today with my recently retired mate, he bought a new Hyundai i20N at the same time I bought the Hyundai Kona EV.
We are both rev heads so the discussion got to the cars, he has had his 6 months longer than me but has done 2,000km less.
So he asked is the EV better than the ICE car, I said probably not at this point in time, but they will get better and infrastructure will improve, to which he said they will never be better than the current ICE cars due to the limitations of EV's and the flexibility and convenience of ICE cars.
The real issues IMO is, EV's have to work, like it or not oil is finite.
Whether we love it or hate it doesn't matter, whether it is causing global warming or not isnt the issue, we have been using ICE technology for just over 100 years at ever increasing rates, oil aint going to last.
So whether ICE vehicles are better or not is a moot point IMO, they are done, like it or not IMO, something has to replace them and ATM EV's are centre stage.
Exactly the issue.Whether we love it or hate it doesn't matter, whether it is causing global warming or not isnt the issue, we have been using ICE technology for just over 100 years at ever increasing rates, oil aint going to last.
The current technology is a stop gap, the T model Ford is nothing like the the latest V8 Mustang, as you say the current battery technology wont be here in 30 years, same as the current battery operated tools are nothing like those from 10 years ago, times move on.Yes,a solar plant and H2O and you can get syn fuel.now and in a 1000y if needed..
Fair a cell powered by H2 is better but there is no real issue yet unless legally engineered in finding a way to fill your ice tank.and I would dare to say that the current battery technology based on lithium will see shortage well before the lack of any diesel, or synfuel.
EV in 30y sure and an improvement but not as they are with the current battery technology.
YOUI say a model Y will cost you between $1500 to $2600 a year to insure. Not that bad. I thought it would be more.There's no doubt that there are issues arising or not being generally addressed and Cadogan can support the comments in the video above.
I am not a fan of his but let's leave shooting the messenger out of the equation and openly discuss the positives and negatives.
A friend of mine is an insurance assessor in a large insurance company and it seems that what Cadogan says is pretty much spot on according to her.
They are not alone...
Electric Vehicles Present New Insurance Challenges in 2023
As the electric vehicle market expands, the demand for proper insurance coverage for all parties grows.www.thehortongroup.com
I think many who discuss energy (in general, not specifically on ASF) forget that oil is the original problem needing to be solved.The real issues IMO is, EV's have to work, like it or not oil is finite.
Whether we love it or hate it doesn't matter, whether it is causing global warming or not isnt the issue, we have been using ICE technology for just over 100 years at ever increasing rates, oil aint going to last.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.