- Joined
- 13 February 2006
- Posts
- 5,286
- Reactions
- 12,186
The same issues magnified, will exist when in drawdown. Until the trader is taken out of the process entirely, ie. the mechanical system is given to a third party merely to execute the signals (or some AI bot) then the system remains 'discretionary'.
I can not imagine how worry I would be to have such a phone exchange.
As we all know, there is no such thing as a linear win curve or a guaranteed win on any system.any period but on a term deposit
Having someone be it family, friend reacting like that would ring alarm bells right and left.
It never ceases to amaze me how often I have witnessed the truth of this!!...
Never underestimate the ability of a trader to f*** up a good system.
Never underestimate the ability of a trader to f*** up a good system.
It seems some people just cannot contain their enthusiam for adding their own personal refinements, to, what would, otherwise be, a perfectly good recipe, thereby causing an emergency evacuation of the kitchen.
Reading between the lines of your writings Skate, I don't think you would be one of these traders.Gee, I hope that isn't a couple of cryptic messages directed in my direction.
Mine was more in reference to the way other people tend to behave upon being handed the reigns, and a map to Eldorado.Gee, I hope that isn't a couple of cryptic messages directed in my direction.
Skate.
Reading between the lines of your writings Skate, I don't think you would be one of these traders.
Mine was more in reference to the way other people tend to behave upon being handed the reigns and a map to Eldorado.
@Skate I think that your excitement may have been generated by your previous experience with this type of system and the techniques it employs. So now you are live testing it but it's not the same as someone building a complete new system, if you have a problem it will be related to some detail about the way you have combined you previously tried and tested techniques. Stay emotionally balanced and clear headed as you live test your system and as each trade is made you will uncover any weak spots or verify there are none. You know what to do and how to do it so because of your previous experience, if there is something that has been overlooked it should be corrected early and the overall impact on the results of the system should be minimal.It can be tempting to feel overconfident when developing a trading strategy and I must admit that I am guilty of that, especially when leveraging off my previous experience. In addition, my excitement about the potential results clouded my judgment and led to hasty decisions, such as trading the SAP Strategy without thoroughly testing it.
@Skate I think that your excitement may have been generated by your previous experience with this type of system and the techniques it employs. So now you are live testing it but it's not the same as someone building a complete new system, if you have a problem it will be related to some detail about the way you have combined you previously tried and tested techniques. Stay emotionally balanced and clear headed as you live test your system and as each trade is made you will uncover any weak spots or verify there are none. You know what to do and how to do it so because of your previous experience, if there is something that has been overlooked it should be corrected early and the overall impact on the results of the system should be minimal.
@Skate Cheer up mate. IMO all your trend trading systems are very similar, so your experience justifies your present confidence. Don't let it waver due to short term market volatility or concerns of your "investors". You're there to do a job on their behalf that they're unable to do for themselves atm.
I trust that any future modifications would be minor. Like, including a close above the prior weeks high to be included with the 50% up requirement. However I would suggest that even this minor mod should be back tested to see if it does improve the system.
I was concerned by the systems first three entries (BOT, HAW, IPD) as I didn't think any of them were included in the All Ordinaries. IPD was included for a little while in 2022 and was recently removed from the All Ords in the March 23 rebalance. Keeping up to date with the constituents of the S&P indices is time consuming. I would eliminate the requirement to be in an index and filter by market cap or the weekly value traded to ensure enough liquidity. IMO, HAW didn't have enough liquidity for your system's position sizes.
Skate, as you correct these errors create 'check lists', it is unprofessional not to use them.I appreciate the importance of thorough testing and will strive to be more diligent in the future to ensure that my strategies are error-free and optimized for success.
Skate, as you correct these errors create 'check lists', it is unprofessional not to use them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?