Not being a smart arse here frog....but GEAR and BEAR are highly correlated. The fact they move in different directions doesn't really factor into the question of correlation. The reality is when one of those move in one direction the other will absolutely move in the opposite direction and so their movement is "joined at the hip"--highly correlated.what do you mean?lowest in price ? or lowest correlated, in that case something like GEAR VS BEAR,, should always move opposite?
as you play in the ASX
Despite the recent sideways movement my index filter has remained on. My weekly and EOD breakout have been fully invested for some time. July didn’t see too many exits or new positions so systems have been pretty steady
Interesting site. Do you have any association with the website? Only ask as I'd like to know a little more about what's "under the hood"Have a look at asxcorrelations.com.
For the ASX20, it looks like NCM and MQG have the closest correlation to zero.
But, be aware, the Aussie stock market is a funny beast mainly because of the large dividend payouts. I'm not sure if this web site back adjusts prices for past dividends.
KH
Hi.Interesting site. Do you have any association with the website? Only ask as I'd like to know a little more about what's "under the hood"
Ok, yes. But i thought the idea was opposite, not going in the same way?Not being a smart arse here frog....but GEAR and BEAR are highly correlated. The fact they move in different directions doesn't really factor into the question of correlation. The reality is when one of those move in one direction the other will absolutely move in the opposite direction and so their movement is "joined at the hip"--highly correlated.
I think that might be what is meant by inverse correlation as opposed to correlation.Not being a smart arse here frog....but GEAR and BEAR are highly correlated. The fact they move in different directions doesn't really factor into the question of correlation. The reality is when one of those move in one direction the other will absolutely move in the opposite direction and so their movement is "joined at the hip"--highly correlated.
I think that might be what is meant by inverse correlation as opposed to correlation.
Edit: Just realised the frog has already pointed this out. Please forgive my hasty intrusion.
Well done for your weekly systems especially in the 2 last weesk where mine got hammered.Couldn't help but notice the tumble weed blowing through the Dump It Here thread, so thought I might post something.
Well the first quarter of the financial year is done and dusted so just thought I'd dump this quarter's performance of my live systems, which is for 1 July thought to 30 Sept.
First up is my weekly system. The Sept quarter certainly was volatile for my weekly system. It was up and down through July and Aug and the overall unit price of my weekly just moved sideways. However, September saw my weekly really get moving upwardly. Over all my weekly system put on 10.67% for the July-Sept quarter, which I'm reasonably happy about. September delivered about half of the quarters 10.67% gain. Going into July my weekly was pretty much 100% invested, but as we hit the end of August a number of the positions were closed out so the system ended up around 60% invested at 30 September.
View attachment 130900
As for my EOD system, it certainly didn't encounter the volatility that my weekly experienced. July was a bit of a flat month, but it certainly found traction through August seeing some good gains. Unfortunately, September wasn't so good for my EOD as it wiped out some of July's gains. Overall, my EOD system delivered a gain of 3.35% for the July - September quarter. My EOD system remained fully invested through the quarter.
View attachment 130901
Finally, my swing system had a reasonable start to the quarter putting on some okay gains from July to around mid-August. Unfortunately it was all downhill from then to end of September. For the quarter my swing system delivered a gain of around 2%.
View attachment 130902
Stay classy ASF.
It did @qldfrog. It started closing out positions from around 2nd week of Sept and no new entries generatedWell done for your weekly systems especially in the 2 last weesk where mine got hammered.
I noticed you ended 60% invested so must have entered an entry freeze earlier .Good strategy
Nice to see you back Mr Skate.system trading is now a faily roller coster up down 6k a day quite often aka 2% up or down in a day. Heart attack stuffRobust trading systems
As a system trader, it's all about building a robust (as opposed to optimal) trading strategy that can withstand multiple outcomes. Since "COVID-19" trading has somewhat changed in as much that profits can “dissolve” so quickly that has to be addressed. Without adapting I'm positive "frustration" will eventually lead to faulty thinking & poor results.
There are so many metrics
There is a multitude of metrics that can evaluate the performance of any trading system just goes to prove how swamped we are with an information overload. Even though you can use these metrics to select the best trading system for you, the criteria for selecting a system tends to be arbitrary. Metrics give an indication but don’t indicate which system is the best in terms of consistency with performance. (Trading is certainly a trade-off between the two)
Skate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?