Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Donald Trump - Business and tax stories

Well at least it finally hit mainstream.
Had a few people here telling me they would trust the fbi over what I was actually presenting.

Two things can be true at once. Trump can be a shtbag. But the wider government can also be a worse swamp of sht.

We have had multiple things they don't pass the sniff test. From impeachment to covid and how it was handled. Even in Australia there's been some suspicious activities.

They all have a common theme:
A bunch of woke lefties conspiring together?
 
KOkaV2dEVVFP.jpeg
 
But don't worry, the 2020 Election was the most secure in history™

CNN said so
 
But don't worry, the 2020 Election was the most secure in history™

CNN said so
They only touched on the ballot harvesting and the "paid to collect votes" scam.
There were a lot of blue groups that were throwing a lot of cash at strategic areas.
 
Trump won 2020

The FBI and CIA both colluded to make sure that Trump was kicked out of office, no matter what and installed a pedo potato - aka, Biden


Screen Shot 2023-05-16 at 5.34.14 pm.png






.
 
Rudy Giuliani has been accused of workplace harrassment and sexual assault. Seems as if there are recordings of some of the allegations being made. Trump gets a mention in the suit as well.
The Axios story has a link to full details of the suit.

Of note: The lawsuit alleges that Giuliani asked Dunphy "if she knew anyone in need" of a presidential pardon, "telling her that he was selling pardons for $2 million, which he and [former] President Trump would split."
  • The allegation added that Giuliani told Dunphy "she could refer individuals seeking pardons to him, so long as they did not go through 'the normal channels' of the Office of the Pardon Attorney, because correspondence going to that office would be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act."
  • There's no suggestion in the suit that any pardons were sold.
 
Actually it seems almost all the allegations have been recorded with Rudy Giulianis knowledge and permission.
Rudy has written the entire case against him - himself.:speechless:
You couldn't make this up.

Truly the Darwin Awards hero of legal insanity.
 
Just to show you how badly the Dems weaponised the FBI

What is disgrace

Wray needs to go (at a minimum)

Clinton (amongst others: Obama/Biden) is also on the hook after the Durham report

 
I wonder if the subpoena will come to fruition and Senate House Committee investigating the corrupt Bidens actually looks into the CIA for their role in the real insurrection (the coup d'état overthrowing of a sitting US President - Trump)

US Intel are cowards and hide behind a classic "it's classified" wall.

It was shown clear as day at yesterday's hearing that the FBI is corrupt to the core and Director Wray will to be removed in the not to distant future. He is a CCP asset. Merrick Garland will also be duck shoved out the door. There have been CCP links to both men.




The above gets interesting around the half hour mark



Some food for thought


CIA fast-tracked letter that falsely suggested Hunter Biden laptop was Russia op

The CIA conspired with former acting director Mike Morell and the Biden campaign to produce a letter falsely claiming that emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop were Russian disinformation — and solicited signatures from at least one former intelligence official, a staff report from the House Judiciary Committee is expected to reveal Wednesday.​
Morell told the CIA’s Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) that he needed the letter approved as an unusual “rush job” that day, October 19, 2020, in an effort to provide then-candidate Joe Biden ammunition in the final presidential debate to discredit The Post’s report on the Biden emails which had been published five days earlier.​
That day, a CIA employee working for the PCRB solicited a signature for Morell’s letter from former CIA analyst David Cariens, according to a written statement by Cariens to the Subcommittees on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, and Intelligence.​
Cariens explained that he had been speaking with the PCRB about the prepublication review of his own memoir and during that phone call the CIA employee “asked” him if he would sign the draft letter.​
“When the person in charge of reviewing my book called to say it was approved with no changes, I was told about the draft letter. The person asked me if I would be willing to sign . . . I agreed to sign.”​
Cariens told his wife, Janice Cariens, also a former CIA officer, about the letter and she also agreed to sign.​
Morell directed the PCRB that “[t]his is a rush job, as it needs to get out as soon as possible.”​
Morell told fellow signatory John Brennan, former CIA director, that he wanted the letter released before Biden’s October 22, 2020, presidential debate against Donald Trump: “Trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate . . .a talking point to push back on Trump.”​
Marc Polymeropoulos, a former CIA Acting Chief of Operations for Europe and Eurasia, congratulated Morell on the afternoon of Oct. 19, 2020, for securing the PCRB’s lightning-fast approval of the letter.​
“You have some juice”, he texted.​
“With the PRB [PCRB]?” asks Morell.​
“Yes, ha,” replies Polymeropoulos.​
“Ha is right,” texted Morell. “They are probably scared I am coming back.”​



More on link below:




Reps. Jim Jordan, Mike Turner Threaten To Subpoena CIA In Hunter Biden Laptop Investigation


House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner (R-Ohio) are threatening to subpoena the CIA to force it to address claims of its involvement in an intelligence community letter to discredit reports on Hunter Biden’s laptop.​
Last week, the two Republican-controlled House committees published a report alleging the CIA’s Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) reviewed and approved an October 2020 letter by 51 former U.S. intelligence community officials, which alleged reports about the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” The Republican report also alleged a PCRB employee may have recruited signatories for the letter discrediting the negative reporting about Hunter Biden and his father, then-presidential candidate Joe Biden.​
The laptop materials, which were first reported by the New York Post, indicated Joe Biden knew about his son’s foreign business dealings despite having denied such knowledge throughout the 2020 election cycle.​
Jordan and Turner sent a letter (pdf) to CIA Director William Burns on Wednesday, requesting that the agency turn over additional documents relating to its involvement in the October 2020 intelligence community letter. The Republican chairmen threatened to use their subpoena power to compel the intelligence agency to divulge its records.​
More on link below:

 
But CNN told me that the 2020 Election was the most secure in history™


 
Donald Trump was found guilty of sexually assaulting Jean Carroll and ordered to pay $10M for repeatedly calling her a liar about what he had done.

The next day ,being the contemptible lying piece of xhit that he is, on the Town Hall meeting with CNN he just trashes her again and again and again.

The good news is that Jean Carroll is taking this piece of merde back to court to hit him for another few million dollars for the same poisonous rubbish.

All power to her arm.

E Jean Carroll files for new damages after Trump’s CNN town hall remarks

Author’s court filing comes after the ex-president demeaned her a day after being found liable for sexual abuse


...The following night, during a live town hall where Trump was interviewed on CNN in New Hampshire, Trump further and repeatedly insulted and demeaned Carroll and her experiences.

Trump said her account of a sexual assault, in the case which he is appealing, was “fake” and a “made-up story” and referred to it as “hanky-panky”. He repeated past claims that he’d never met Carroll and considered her a “whack job.”

Carroll’s new filing aims to inflict a further financial penalty against Trump for those remarks, claiming they are defamatory.

Lawyers for Carroll said that Trump had “doubled down” on derogatory remarks about her a day after the verdict.

The filing claimed Trump’s statements at the televised town hall “show the depth of his malice toward Carroll, since it is hard to imagine defamatory conduct that could possibly be more motivated by hatred, ill will or spite” and demanded “a very substantial punitive damages award in Carroll’s favor both to punish Trump, to deter him from engaging in further defamation and to deter others from doing the same.”

Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, told the New York Times on Monday evening that Trump’s remarks on CNN “makes a mockery of the jury verdict and our justice system” if the former president was allowed to get away with repeating defamatory statements.

 
Donald Trump was found guilty of sexually assaulting Jean Carroll and ordered to pay $10M for repeatedly calling her a liar about what he had done.

The next day ,being the contemptible lying piece of xhit that he is, on the Town Hall meeting with CNN he just trashes her again and again and again.

The good news is that Jean Carroll is taking this piece of merde back to court to hit him for another few million dollars for the same poisonous rubbish.

All power to her arm.

E Jean Carroll files for new damages after Trump’s CNN town hall remarks

Author’s court filing comes after the ex-president demeaned her a day after being found liable for sexual abuse


...The following night, during a live town hall where Trump was interviewed on CNN in New Hampshire, Trump further and repeatedly insulted and demeaned Carroll and her experiences.

Trump said her account of a sexual assault, in the case which he is appealing, was “fake” and a “made-up story” and referred to it as “hanky-panky”. He repeated past claims that he’d never met Carroll and considered her a “whack job.”

Carroll’s new filing aims to inflict a further financial penalty against Trump for those remarks, claiming they are defamatory.

Lawyers for Carroll said that Trump had “doubled down” on derogatory remarks about her a day after the verdict.

The filing claimed Trump’s statements at the televised town hall “show the depth of his malice toward Carroll, since it is hard to imagine defamatory conduct that could possibly be more motivated by hatred, ill will or spite” and demanded “a very substantial punitive damages award in Carroll’s favor both to punish Trump, to deter him from engaging in further defamation and to deter others from doing the same.”

Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, told the New York Times on Monday evening that Trump’s remarks on CNN “makes a mockery of the jury verdict and our justice system” if the former president was allowed to get away with repeating defamatory statements.

You fool. You cannot be found "guilty" in a civil court. Notwithstanding the judgement, there is actually zero evidence of such.... which is why this ain't over.
 
You fool. You cannot be found "guilty" in a civil court. Notwithstanding the judgement, there is actually zero evidence of such.... which is why this ain't over.
Really ? So exactly why did a jury decide that on the balance of probabilities they believed that Donald Trump had sexually assaulted Jean Carroll and then lied, and lied about the entire incident ?

Of course this wasn't a criminal trial was it ? It was a civil case to decide who was telling the truth. And in 3 hours a jury decided who was believable.

Good luck with Trump trying to overturn this verdict. Even better luck when the judgment is doubled becasue that piece opf merde decided he would slander Jean Carroll again. I'm hoping the next Judge decides that any further comments would be treated as contempt of court and acted upon accordingly.
 
All roads lead back to Hillary and Obama.

The Durham Report is exposing it all

Obama will be tried for treason. Hillary too probably

20230523_202056.jpg

Screenshot_20230523-202551.png
 
Really ? So exactly why did a jury decide that on the balance of probabilities they believed that Donald Trump had sexually assaulted Jean Carroll and then lied, and lied about the entire incident ?

Of course this wasn't a criminal trial was it ? It was a civil case to decide who was telling the truth. And in 3 hours a jury decided who was believable.

Good luck with Trump trying to overturn this verdict. Even better luck when the judgment is doubled becasue that piece opf merde decided he would slander Jean Carroll again. I'm hoping the next Judge decides that any further comments would be treated as contempt of court and acted upon accordingly.
Ah yes. Balance of probabilities.

He said, she said.
 
Top