wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 26,006
- Reactions
- 13,334
Scientific evidence Wayne.
Other people have tried but it hasn't got through, so I won't try, but all the best to you and your misses and I hope you manage to avoid any repercussions from your position.
[/QUote yesOkay.Scientific evidence Wayne.
Other people have tried but it hasn't got through, so I won't try, but all the best to you and your misses and I hope you manage to avoid any repercussions from your position.
Can you please present the scientific evidence as to my risks from the current iteration of coronavirus.
Can you also please present the scientific evidence of my short and long-term risks from the mRNA injections.
Can you please quantify my risk vs benefit analysis.
Can you please quantify, advised hospitalized and/or have died from the virus, the general good health or otherwise and also the incidence and number of comorbidities of those so affected.
Can you quantify my ri individual with 0 comorbidities of good health and of good health add to my risk of dying from COVID.
I may have other questions for you but if you could answer these I would be appreciative.
No idea what happened there but click to expand
Waiting for your sCiEnCe, Horace.Some reading of prior posts in this thread will help you I hope.
Wouldn't surprise me if a journalist madeup that facebook page just to report on it.Here's a first. Maybe.
News Ltd debunking fabricated COVID stories being circulated on Facebook.
In fact it is a very convincing story. Lot's of detail. I'm certain it has had it's effect and equally sure that the believers will not back down.
Truth about 7-year-old boy who ‘died after receiving Covid-19 vaccine’
A Sydney father has shared how his son died in an ambulance days after being vaccinated against Covid-19 — but authorities say it’s not what it seems.
View attachment 136489Natalie Brown
@natalieisbrown
3 min read
January 24, 2022 - 6:51PM
View attachment 136490
A Sydney father’s declaration that his “beautiful” seven-year-old son died in the back of an ambulance of a “massive heart attack” days after receiving his Covid-19 vaccine has been labelled a hoax by authorities.
More from social
https://www.news.com.au/technology/...r/news-story/1e76c33b25dedbd1f35e9a33b1078c96
A Sydney father’s declaration that his “beautiful” seven-year-old son died in the back of an ambulance of a “massive heart attack” days after receiving his Covid-19 vaccine has been labelled a hoax by authorities.
In a lengthy Facebook comment that swiftly drummed up thousands of likes, comments and shares, “Steve Leary” claimed he lost his son “Lachlan” last Wednesday “to the vaccine”.
Truth about 7yo who ‘died after vax’
A Sydney father’s declaration that his “beautiful” seven-year-old son died in the back of an ambulance of a “massive heart attack” days after receiving his Covid-19 vaccine has been labelled a hoax by authorities.www.news.com.au
Ah 3 cornered one, that even out cynicises me!Wouldn't surprise me if a journalist madeup that facebook page just to report on it.
"Free" news websites survive on clickbait not genuine journalism.
What difference would it make if they let them through while doing their testing.Australia’s health regulator is holding up the delivery of at least 20 million rapid antigen tests after it launched a review to see if the products are effective against detecting Omicron and other Covid-19 variants.
As Australia battles a shortage of rapid tests, the Therapeutic Goods Administration has begun a “post market review” of RATs, which also includes previously approved products. It is a move that has frustrated rapid antigen test suppliers, with the TGA perceived to be slowing down the distribution of rapid tests in Australia.
But the TGA says each new Covid-19 strain emerges – such as the highly infectious but less severe Omicron variant – rapid test manufacturers must ensure that their products remain effective. It is a process that requires rigorous analysis and comes as the World Health Organisation warns Omicron will not be the last Covid mutation.
“Variants of the virus due to mutations in the protein target of the genome may alter the structure of a viral protein. As a result, tests kits may no longer be able to detect the virus, leading to false negative results,” the TGA said.
The accuracy of rapid tests — which have a narrower window of detection than more expensive and government-funded pathology-based testing — is vital given they are increasingly becoming a tool used across businesses, the freight sector and schools and hospitals to segregate those infected with Covid-19.
But for ASX-listed diagnostics company, Atomo, the TGA’s review means it can’t exercise an option to import 20 million rapid tests from US manufacturer Access Bio until it can show that the tests can detect Omicron and other Covid-19 variants.
Its not definitive, but it does mean that there should be some further research without the hysterical denunciations about "horse Medicne".Abstract
Background: Ivermectin has demonstrated different mechanisms of action that potentially protect from both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and COVID-19-related comorbidities. Based on the studies suggesting efficacy in prophylaxis combined with the known safety profile of ivermectin, a citywide prevention program using ivermectin for COVID-19 was implemented in Itajaí, a southern city in Brazil in the state of Santa Catarina. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of regular ivermectin use on subsequent COVID-19 infection and mortality rates.
Materials and methods: We analyzed data from a prospective, observational study of the citywide COVID-19 prevention with ivermectin program, which was conducted between July 2020 and December 2020 in Itajaí, Brazil. Study design, institutional review board approval, and analysis of registry data occurred after completion of the program. The program consisted of inviting the entire population of Itajaí to a medical visit to enroll in the program and to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as an optional treatment to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day. In cases where a participating citizen of Itajaí became ill with COVID-19, they were recommended not to use ivermectin or any other medication in early outpatient treatment. Clinical outcomes of infection, hospitalization, and death were automatically reported and entered into the registry in real time. Study analysis consisted of comparing ivermectin users with non-users using cohorts of infected patients propensity score-matched by age, sex, and comorbidities. COVID-19 infection and mortality rates were analyzed with and without the use of propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects were included in the analysis: 113,845 (71.3%) regular ivermectin users and 45,716 (23.3%) non-users. Of these, 4,311 ivermectin users were infected, among which 4,197 were from the city of Itajaí (3.7% infection rate), and 3,034 non-users (from Itajaí) were infected (6.6% infection rate), with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.53-0.58; p < 0.0001). Using PSM, two cohorts of 3,034 subjects suffering from COVID-19 infection were compared. The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (25 [0.8%] versus 79 [2.6%] among ivermectin non-users; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49; p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46; p < 0.0001). There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (44 versus 99 hospitalizations among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63; p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 023-0.66; p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.
Its not definitive, but it does mean that there should be some further research without the hysterical denunciations about "horse Medicine".
In cell cultures for FS in concentrations that will kill you if it was in your body in a LAB. Jeez. In real life, not very effective. This was published May 2020, old news, numerous studies have occured since then! Anyone know experiments in a dish don't always work in real life as any biotech investor will tell you.
Also there are now better more highly effective treatments now. Anyone taking this needs his head read.
It was pulled from medical science journals but gets regurgitated here yet again.Its not definitive, but it does mean that there should be some further research without the hysterical denunciations about "horse Medicne".
Anti-vaxxers hold emergency meeting to prepare new excuses, after provisional approval of Novavax
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?