Knobby22
Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast
- Joined
- 13 October 2004
- Posts
- 9,948
- Reactions
- 7,040
I suggest that if you do get very sick that you head to the hospital and don't rely on remedies but its your decision.M8, not wanting to appear to be playing the man because I do respect your opinion as I said
But this Covid debacle is, (and has been) a terribly polarizing situation.
You actually said (paraphrasing), that if you took Ivermectin, you would need to "have your head read"??
That is a definitive statement suggesting that Ivermectin is of ZERO advantage?
I accept there are other treatments for Covid which have/are showing good success
But to state that taking Ivermectin (based on the studies to date), is akin to "lunacy"
Seems a little (perhaps a lot) unfair(based on my research and humble opinion)
Cheers
ps Just read your last post regarding you have finished saying what you want to say. (I understand)
I had already posted my post so not trying to "badger" I assure.
Cheers (X2)
The "booster" most likely gives people an added short term "protection" against infection etc etc (accepted )
I wont personally comment on this. But here is his profile and he remains in the land of the living.
I wont personally comment on this. But here is his profile and he remains in the land of the living.
Quotes claiming to be from Attali's book Verbatim have been spread around the internet by covid conspiracy theorists. The quotes are a fabrication. [1]
Perhaps your antipathy to all things even remotely related to Rupert Murdoch may be slightly misplaced.Here's a first. Maybe.
News Ltd debunking fabricated COVID stories being circulated on Facebook.
In fact it is a very convincing story. Lot's of detail. I'm certain it has had it's effect and equally sure that the believers will not back down.
Perhaps your antipathy to all things even remotely related to Rupert Murdoch may be slightly misplaced.
Mick
There are those who would say something similar about the Guardian, or the Age, or The Conversation, but from a different political perspective, or anything written by Peter Fitzimmons.I totally despise the guy for the way he uses his media empire on a number of fronts.
But that doesn't mean every story or every writer for News Ltd is wrong. I just look for corroborating evidence or enough evidence in the story to warrant accepting it as reasonably accurate.
On the other hand if Andrew Bolt has his name at the top - all bets off.
In fact it is a very convincing story. Lot's of detail. I'm certain it has had it's effect and equally sure that the believers will not back down.
Firstly, a disclaimer: I did get sucked in by that image I posted above... mea culpa.That's the way it is with the worst of the anti-vaxxers. Just put it out there and damn the consequences. The feeble minded believers will just keep spreading it. It will be enough to deter some people contemplating vaccination for themselves or their children to hold back after reading the article.
So it seems to me that we probably have a greater risk from the injections than the virus, especially the current iteration.
Add in the still the unknown long term effects of these injections and we both still remain resolutely hesitant... *hesitant, not anti.
Additionally, we have satisfied ourselves that we pose no risk to the wider community by remaining unjabbed, any greater than the jabbed.
Tell some people what, Horace?You just can't tell some people...
Scientific evidence Wayne.Tell some people what, Horace?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?