wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,588
- Reactions
- 12,712
I'm not disputing any of that about the true anti vaxxers. What I'm concerned about is the lumping together as anti vaxxers people who have some concerns about the covid vax and hence are waiting for further information, or based on current data don't see it as a good risk reward proposition.There is a bit of nuance here Wayne. My response to DB was with regard to how the anti-vaxxer movement was started and built a very big presence from 1994-5 onwards. There were a few consequences
1) A community developed that undermined public confidence in vaccination to the point that vaccination rates for children against mumps. measles ect fell substantially. So clearly the messaging and effectiveness of this core was there.
2) When COVID came and then the relatively rapid development of vaccines there was now an active, articulate community that was determined to undermine the COVID vaccines. I suggest this has been a major factor in poisoning the well.
So the messaging against the COVID vaccines didn't start from zero. What has also occurred has been a deepening rejection of "medical authorities" as legitimate information sources and an acceptance of a range of alternatives as just as good if not better. Those alternatives have ranged from believing in God, accepting MMS treatment (Miracle Mineral solutions bleach) as cures, promoting natural immunity - no need for vaccines, undermining the risks of COVID.
And on top of that there are conspiracy theories around George Soros, 5G, Q Anon, vaccines have secret trackers. A number of these have been highlighted on ASF.
In the end they come down to a diverse chorus of people undermining vaccines as a critical part of protecting our community against a dangerous disease.
The language being used is only serving to divide our society over a medical procedure which does not have any long-term data available.
And that my friend is entirely toxic and unscientific.