- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,439
That's not the point!The PM is limited because it is a Federation and he doesn't have absolute say over the States.
I made statements about what what could work, given they have been proven to work elsewhere in the world - hardly my opinion!As for your self opinionated thread, on how to run things, how many replies did it get?
No, I wrote policy for whoever was in government at the time. The fundamental difference in my almost 20 years experience was that Labor was always proactive while the Coalition tended to be more reactive.On that subject, didn't you say you had something to do with writing policy for the Labor Party ....
Keep your personal comments to yourself and address the issues.Maybe you will still be blaming Morrison, when Andrews calls stage 129.
It must have been the Liberals who sacked you.
Maybe you should change your moniker to Sir Humfries, he was an expert at never admitting when he was wrong and also never said in two words what could be said in 100.
It's you to a tee.
Even the SMH is starting to look at Andrews strangely, which doesn't bode well for him.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/...death-toll-stands-at-247-20200806-p55izo.html
Well every other state seems to have got the consistent message, you really do need to open your mind, rather than trying to make the situation suit the answer you want.
I guess it is a constitution thing, I believe McGowan is pushing to have it re scheduled in the Supreme Court, as it should.The federal governments backing Palmer on opening WA boarders was an ideological position at best given the obvious risks to mining in the state which currently is the engine room for the economy that's before you get to the pros and cons of such a move regarding the health of the WA population.
Note that Palmer hasn't ever applied at any time to enter WA yet still the Coalition backed him......why?
Whats the policy agenda for this?
As Morrison wont open parliament up we don't know.
it beggars belief that the government wants everyone to go to work yet our federal politicians cannot seem to be able to do the same.
At what point will you address issues rather than incorrectly attribute poster ideology?And yet, our leftists here look for someone else to blame... Anyone other than members of their own pathetic tribe.
yes, i'm thinking similar thoughts as well. mean time, we continue to ride through to the next phase, whatever that is.Where I can see a problem is if multiple states do eradicate it but one or more doesn't.
Individually those other states might be a bit of a pushover politically, the smaller population ones in particular, but collectively they're somewhat more significant. Even if it's just Qld, NT, WA, SA, Tas well they've still got a lot of clout between them.
I'm foreseeing a risk of some sort of conflict between the states and the federal government basically. I don't mean conflict as in military sort of conflict but perhaps the biggest conflict we've seen between states in a very long time. Any state which has actually eradicated it sure isn't going to be at all keen on having people come in from somewhere that it's rampant.
The idea that NSW and Vic, or even just Vic, is isolated from everywhere else for an extended period would be "interesting" to say the least.
At what point will you address issues rather than incorrectly attribute poster ideology?
It would cop a lot more outrage, if it could be put down to Trump or Morrison.Victoria reports 911 healthcare workers have Covid-19, after daily rise of 101
There are now 911 healthcare workers with active infections of Covid-19 in Victoria, a rise of 101 since Thursday. Hospitals are already under pressure as nurses are diverted to tackle the crisis in aged care homes and 607 people in the state’s hospitals with the virus.
https://www.theguardian.com/austral...workers-have-covid-19-after-daily-rise-of-101
Like many of your posts, it is factually flawed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?